Skip to content

Hawai'i Rainbow Warriors

Mountain West·1-2·
Elo
1426#82
SP+
-7.0#91
FPI
-6.9
AP
NR
Next@ Wyoming · Wk 4Win prob 83%Model -15.8
Talent #115 (556.8)Recruiting class #12465% production returning

Roster · 109 players

FR 30SO 27JR 22SR 30
#PlayerPosClHtWt
10Bjorn JurgensenQBFR6'3"200
12Micah AlejadoQBSO5'10"180
14Isaac Jaramilla-PheQBSR6'1"200
16Hazyn BotelhoQBFR6'0"170
0Cam BarfieldRBSR5'7"190
1DeVon RiceRBSO5'9"180
26Sitani MikaeleRBSO5'11"230
28TJ Fo'ilefutuRBFR6'0"240
30James Steffany-FiameRBFR5'8"175
31Noah BartleyRBSR5'9"220
2Audric HarrisWRJR6'1"190
3Carson BrownWRSR6'2"200
4Jarvis HeimuliWRSO6'3"200
5Pofele AshlockWRSR6'2"180
6Kainoa CarvalhoWRFR5'6"165
7Tre' GriffithsWRSO6'3"205
8Tama UiliataWRSO5'11"195
11Devin AlvesWRSR6'3"195
13Koa EldredgeWRSR6'0"190
17Nick DelgadilloWRJR6'0"190
18Blaze KamokuWRSR5'6"185
19Diezel KamokuWRSO5'9"185
22Titan LacadenWRFR5'6"175
80Robert Haynes IVWRFR6'2"175
83Josiah FetuiWRSO6'3"185
84Dillon BoothWRFR5'9"180
86Brandon GaeaWRFR6'0"190
9Devon TauaefaTESR6'5"230
45Micah Kaonohi-KaihenuiTESR5'11"255
46Matthew BailiffTEJR6'1"235
74Andrew PriceTEFR6'5"235
81Frank AbreuTEFR6'4"235
85Oakie Salave'aTESR6'2"240
88Anthony HickmanTESO6'3"235
50Tu'i MutiOLSO6'1"300
51Eric McFallOLSO6'4"305
52Dean BriskiOLSR6'5"305
53Kawika HallumsOLFR6'2"295
54Jordan KernaghanOLFR6'3"285
55Jay Tauala-HarrisOLSO6'3"290
56Boogie HendersonOLSO6'4"310
57Ethan SpencerOLSR6'2"300
58Denaris DeRosa Jr.OLSR6'3"285
60Ezekiel SalanoaOLFR5'11"290
62Lautaimi ManumaOLSO6'3"300
65Vake HeheaOLJR6'4"300
66Cooper TroyOLFR6'5"310
72Josh TavuiOLFR6'2"300
73Lipe MoalaOLJR6'6"345
74Vainuupo FanuaeaOLFR6'4"275
75Khalil WalkerOLJR6'5"300
77Uluaki TaukiuveaOLFR6'5"300
79Judah KaioOLSR6'3"305
9Adam TomczykDLSR6'3"255
10Ka'eo AkanaDLSR6'3"245
20Noah WilyDLSO6'3"240
26Nazaiah CaravalloDLSO6'2"235
51Lesterlaisene LagafuainaDLJR6'4"245
52Luther McCoyDLSR6'5"270
55Zoram PeteloDLSO6'4"270
56Spencer ElliottDLSR6'3"255
88Elijah WilliamsDLJR6'3"300
90Ha'aheo Dela CruzDLSO6'2"260
91Josh SagapoluteleDLJR6'0"255
92Waipehe WinchesterDLSO6'2"265
95Geoffrey Speight Jr.DLSR6'1"280
96Iosefa LetuliDLSO6'5"270
97Jordan LynchDLSO6'3"290
98Tonga PaeaDLJR6'4"315
99Ozzy PollardDLSO6'4"300
7Julian SmithLBJR6'0"210
8Matteus IoaneLBSO6'2"225
11Jamih OtisLBSR5'11"220
12Wynden Ho'ohuliLBSR6'3"240
17Ben HudsonLBSR6'2"225
18Zaden MariteragiLBFR6'1"230
31Aisiah PaogofieLBFR6'1"220
35Junior FiauiLBSO6'3"215
39Zion VeaLBFR5'10"205
43Alika Cavaco-AmoyLBSO6'0"215
47Kingston CostalesLBFR5'11"210
48Kolo KaululaauLBJR6'0"215
49Tasi TadioLBJR5'11"225
0Jeremiah HughesDBJR6'0"180
2Kona MooreDBJR6'0"190
3Joenel FigueroaDBSR6'0"190
4Elijah PalmerDBSR5'8"185
5Jaylon EdmondDBSO5'10"170
6Zion AllenDBSR6'1"175
13Elijah GipsonDBSR6'0"170
14Riis WeberDBJR6'1"200
19Kela MooreDBJR6'0"185
21Makana MeyerDBJR5'9"185
22Ezekiel RodriguesDBSO6'0"195
23Kydel StoneDBFR6'1"185
24Kodi DeCambraDBJR5'11"190
25Matagi ThompsonDBSR6'2"190
27Jahren AlturaDBFR5'10"175
28Marquis RichardsonDBFR6'2"190
29Kainoa OntaiDBJR5'11"180
30Avin HoustonDBFR6'3"185
34Brayton CorreaDBFR5'10"185
36Jordan FetuDBJR5'10"175
16Hudson BorsariPKFR5'10"175
98Sean Olvera-HarlePKSR6'0"205
43Gannon MillerPFR6'0"190
47Gehrig HeilPFR6'1"195
33Jack MowreyLSJR6'3"235
45Nick PangLSSR5'10"220

Team Statistics · per game, with national FBS rank

Points / game
20.7
scoring offense
Points allowed
25.7
scoring defense
Differential
-5.0
per game
Offense
Total yards / game
308.0#121
Yards / play
4.1#131
Passing yards / game
226.0#70
Rushing yards / game
82.0#132
First downs / game
19.5#87
3rd down %
43.6%#62
4th down %
75.0%#30
Time of possession
30:36#64
Defense
Yards allowed / game
423.5#120
Yards / play allowed
6.4#121
Pass yards allowed / game
213.0#82
Rush yards allowed / game
210.5#129
3rd down % allowed
45.2%#110
Sacks
1#125
Tackles for loss
7#108
Turnovers & Discipline
Turnover margin
-2#108
Takeaways
0#126
Giveaways
2#49
Penalties / game
6.5#61
Penalty yards / game
45.0#44

Rank is national among all FBS teams (#1 = best), oriented so higher rank = better even for defensive and discipline metrics. Bars show percentile.

Scouting Report · 3 games in

heavily pass-leaning

Hawai'i throws it: Timmy Chang's offenses have been heavily pass-leaning across 4 seasons. The way in is 132nd at stuffing runs at the line, and they are 126th at running it.

On fourth down he goes for it about as often as his peers do from the same spots (+0.8%). Against what the expected-points model recommends he is −23.2% — the profession as a whole is negative on this.

Hawai'i has played 3 games against an average slate, adjusted for here. That football carries about 34% of what is below; the rest is still the preseason projection.

Soft spots

  • Defensegetting stopped at the line
    12.6%
    #132 of 138
  • Offenserunning it
    -0.05
    #126 of 138
  • Defenserunning it
    +0.24
    #112 of 138

Each bar is where this team sits in the country. Before the season has produced enough football these are PROJECTIONS — last season regressed to the mean, plus talent, returning production, recruiting and whether the staff is the same one — and the season replaces them as it is played. Head coaches only — there is no free feed for coordinators, so on a program where the head coach does not call the offense this describes the staff he hired. Play-calling identity is a style, not a grade: throwing more than the situations warrant is not better than throwing less than they warrant.

2026 Season Projection

model win prob · 9 to play
8.13.9
projected final record (now 12)
Exp. wins left
7.1
of 9 games
Bowl odds
98%
reach 6 wins
Best odds
99%
vs San José State
Toughest
44%
vs Arizona State

How the season could finish · 2026 · chance of each final win total · 9 games left

Every remaining game simulated from the model's win probability for it. Tallest bar is the single likeliest finish, not a prediction that it happens.

12345678910
final winstallest bar = 33% chance
Likeliest finish 8-4 (33%)Bowl eligible 98% · marked on the axis at 6

Player Value

EPA contribution by position group + estimated NIL market value (derived from position rates and on-field production — not actual deal figures).

Unit Value — Total EPA
WRDevin Alves, Audric Harris +9
+37.4 EPA
QBMicah Alejado, Bjorn Jurgensen
+14.4 EPA
TEDevon Tauaefa, Frank Abreu
+3.8 EPA
RBCam Barfield, Devon Rice +1
-2.8 EPA

Total EPA produced by each positional group this season. OL value is captured via the rush/pass efficiency of skill players; OL-specific EPA isn't separately reported.

Estimated NIL Market Value
ESTIMATED
EPA +16.70.110/play152 snaps
WRTama Uiliata
~$377K
EPA +20.20.840/play24 snaps
EPA +7.30.305/play24 snaps
RBDevon Rice
~$150K
EPA +2.10.035/play59 snaps
EPA -4.2-0.190/play22 snaps

Estimated from position-group market rates and on-field EPA contribution. Actual NIL valuations depend on social media following, brand fit, and market negotiations — these figures are directional only.

The Five Factors

ranked vs. FBS · bar = better
Efficiency (PPA)
Off0.048th#127
Def0.2023rd#107
Explosiveness
Off1.1628th#99
Def1.2650th#69
Field position
Off72.977th#32
Def75.222nd#108
Finishing (pts/opp)
Off3.5632nd#94
Def3.7332nd#94
Turnovers
Won 3Lost 3
Margin 0

Opponent-adjusted efficiency

EPA/play vs. schedule
Offense
Defense
Off · pass
0.059th#126
Off · rush
0.0424th#105

Pass vs. rush (PPA)

Rushing
Off-0.0513th#120
Def0.249th#125
Passing
Off0.1518th#114
Def0.1760th#56

Trenches & disruption

Line yards (off)
3.10#63
2nd-level / open-field
1.28 / 1.63
Power / stuff (off)
80.0% / 18.4%
Havoc — total (def)
14.6%#93
Havoc — front 7 / DB
7.3% / 7.3%

Standard vs. passing downs

Pro
Std downs
Off-0.00
Def0.14
Pass downs
Off0.11
Def0.40

PPA on each down type (off vs. def).

Opponent-adjusted by down

Pro
1st2nd3rd
Offense-0.27#136-0.11#1210.49#77
Defense0.29#134-0.02#410.70#113

Elo Trajectory

@StanfordFinal
Elo rating 14721435-37 over season

Team Fingerprint · 2026 · 43 opponent-adjusted metrics · percentile vs 138 FBS teams

Plot these →
worst in FBSbest

Efficiency

  • Offense EPA/play-0.0114th
  • Defense EPA/play allowed0.2423rd
  • Offense success rate34%15th
  • Defense success rate allowed41%36th

Downs

  • Offense success — standard downs37%13th
  • Offense success — passing downs31%40th
  • Defense success allowed — standard downs48%31st
  • Defense success allowed — passing downs21%69th

Explosiveness

  • Offense explosiveness1.359th
  • Defense explosiveness allowed1.332nd
  • Offense explosiveness — standard downs1.154th
  • Offense explosiveness — passing downs1.623rd

Trenches

  • Offense line yards3.366th
  • Defense line yards allowed3.411th
  • Offense highlight yards0.9049th
  • Defense highlight yards allowed1.234th
  • Offense power success0.8063rd
  • Defense power success allowed0.6761st
  • Offense stuff rate0.1366th
  • Defense stuff rate0.1316th

Third down

  • Third down conversion41%42nd
  • Third down distance faced7.525th
  • Third down conversion allowed47%26th
  • Third down distance forced5.712th

Halves

  • Net success rate — first half-0.1515th
  • Net success rate — second half-0.0234th

Drives

  • Points per drive1.024th
  • Points per drive allowed2.242nd
  • Average starting field position2419th
  • Opponent starting field position2760th
  • Available yards gained36%23rd
  • Available yards allowed52%38th
  • Scoring opportunities per drive71%32nd
  • Scoring opportunities allowed77%59th
  • Points per scoring opportunity1.930th
  • Points allowed per opportunity2.945th
  • Three-and-out rate42%20th
  • Three-and-outs forced32%64th

Roster

  • Returning usage58%69th
  • Returning EPA23588th
  • Team talent composite55717th
  • Recruiting class rank12410th
  • Recruiting class points16110th

Every metric is opponent-adjusted and ranked so that higher is always better — a defensive rate that is good when low is ranked accordingly. Sack and tackle-for-loss composition are deliberately absent: their relationship to team quality is a measured null, so they carry a style rather than a rank, and they appear in the pressure signature instead.

Intelligence Report

Offensive DNA

Pass-dominant offense — below average EPA/play nationally
EPA/play
+0.039#127 · bottom 20%
Pass EPA/play
+0.145#114
Rush EPA/play
-0.054#120
Explosiveness
1.163#99
Pts/opportunity
3.56#94
Success rate
37.4%

Pass efficiency edge: 0.199 EPA/play

🛡

Defensive Identity

Disciplined defense — allowing above-average EPA/play
EPA/play allowed
+0.202#107 · below avg
Havoc rate (total)
14.6%#93
Front-7 havoc
7.3%
DB havoc
7.3%
Big play rate allowed
1.259#69
Success rate allowed
43.4%

Disruption comes evenly from front and secondary.

📊

Season Signature

20.7 PPG offense, 25.7 allowed — -5.0 margin/game
Points per game
20.7
Points allowed/game
25.7
Scoring margin/game
-5.0
Turnover margin
+0won 3 · lost 3
Production returning
65%
Talent rank (247)
#115

1-2 record through 3 games.

Team Shape · percentile vs. FBS · dashed = 50th

OFFENSE8thEXPLOSIVENESS28thFINISHING32thFIELD POS77thDEFENSE23thHAVOC33th50th100th
Offense
8th
Explosiveness
28th
Finishing
32th
Field Pos
77th
Defense
23th
Havoc
33th

Each axis = national percentile rank. 100th = best in FBS, 0th = worst. Defense and Havoc are oriented so higher = better.

The season, week by week · 2026

A season-long average is taken over a period during which the team changed. This is the same numbers as a trajectory, so a mid-season turn is visible instead of averaged away.

Offense EPA/play 0.013 in the second half
-0.060.040.13112

Line is the season-to-date average — the number the rest of this page reports. Bars are the individual weeks that moved it.

Defense EPA allowed 0.193 in the second half
0.110.220.33112

Line is the season-to-date average — the number the rest of this page reports. Bars are the individual weeks that moved it.

Offense success rate 0.029 in the second half
0.330.380.43112

Line is the season-to-date average — the number the rest of this page reports. Bars are the individual weeks that moved it.

Defense success allowed 0.029 in the second half
0.380.420.47112

Line is the season-to-date average — the number the rest of this page reports. Bars are the individual weeks that moved it.

CORE efficiency · situation and opponent removed

Points per 100 plays above average, after the game state is regressed out of every snap and the schedule is solved out across the whole league. The version of this team’s efficiency that can be compared to a team it never played.

Overall
-16.0
#132
Offense
-12.1
#135
Defense
+3.9
#104
Full CORE ratings →

What a possession is worth · 24 drives

MeasureOffenseDefense
Points per drive1.042.23
Starting field positionown 23.6own 26.5
Available yards36.2%51.6%
Scoring opportunities70.8%77.3%
Points per opportunity1.882.88
Three-and-out rate41.7%31.8%
Every team’s drive efficiency →

Play-calling identity

Against what the league calls from the same down, distance, field position, score and clock — so this is the staff, not the game script.

Pass rate
69.2%
Expected, given the spots
54.5%
Over expected
+14.7
Fourth down vs peers
+0
Fourth down vs the model
-29
All play-calling tendencies →

National Landscape · 2026 FBS · offense vs. defense EPA/play

Each dot = one FBS team. Hawai'i is highlighted. Tap or hover a dot for details.

ELITEDEF. FORTRESSOFF. POWERHOUSEREBUILDING-0.100.00+0.10+0.20+0.30-0.050.00+0.10+0.20Offensive EPA/play← worsebetter →Defensive EPA allowed/play← worsebetter →

Similar Programs

Teams with the closest offense + defense efficiency profile to Hawai'i in 2026

by EPA/play distance
Georgia TechSP+ +1.7
Off EPA/play +0.041Def EPA/play +0.188Elo 1553
Match
99%
UNLVSP+ +2.3
Off EPA/play +0.041Def EPA/play +0.186Elo 1589
Match
99%
RiceSP+ -10.4
Off EPA/play +0.060Def EPA/play +0.229Elo 1196
Match
98%
CaliforniaSP+ -3.4
Off EPA/play +0.057Def EPA/play +0.169Elo 1349
Match
98%
WyomingSP+ -15.2
Off EPA/play +0.071Def EPA/play +0.169Elo 1300
Match
97%
Fresno StateSP+ -7.6
Off EPA/play +0.044Def EPA/play +0.257Elo 1449
Match
97%

Similarity = normalized Euclidean distance on season offensive and defensive EPA/play. Teams within ±0.02 EPA/play on both units score >90%.

Program Trajectory · CORE rating · 20152026 · points per game vs an average FBS team

2015: -26.8, #124 of 1282016: -11.7, #99 of 1282017: -22.4, #122 of 1302018: -11.2, #99 of 1302019: -3.7, #73 of 1302020: -1.0, #68 of 1242021: -1.1, #76 of 1302022: -26.5, #128 of 1312023: -18.6, #121 of 1332024: -10.4, #99 of 1342025: -6.2, #82 of 1362026: -16.0, #132 of 138
20152026
Now -16.0 · #132 of 138Best -1.0 in 2020Worst -26.8 in 2015

Program History

recent seasons
YearOverallConfWin %xWLuck
20260-20-1
0%
0.0-0.0
20259-45-3
69%
7.1+1.9
20245-73-4
42%
5.3-0.3
20235-83-5
38%
4.0+1.0
20223-102-6
23%
2.9+0.1
20216-73-5
46%
6.3-0.3
20205-44-4
56%
4.1+0.9
201910-55-4
67%
8.2+1.8
20188-65-3
57%
7.4+0.6
20173-91-7
25%
3.9-0.9

xW = expected wins from per-game dominance. Luck = actual − expected (positive = won close games).

0.1%of 50,000 simulated 2026 seasons end with them in the field

0-2 so far, projected to finish 6.4-5.7. Wins the Mountain West in 3.8%.

If they finish with…

5.8%
2 losses
0.0%
3 losses
0%
4 losses

Their chance of making it at each final loss count.

Win out and it is 5.8%. One bid goes to the best champion outside the four power leagues, so running the table only enters them into that argument.

down 3.4 points since preseasonlost 27-37 to Stanford against an expected margin of 3, so 18.5 against the number.

  • At 2 losses they are 5.8% where the average Mountain West team is 6.6%.
  • The Mountain West takes 0.23 bids in an average season.
  • One bid goes to the best champion outside the P4. They take it in 0.1% of seasons, having won their league in 100% of those.

Hawai'i’s own turning points

Points of playoff probability between winning and losing.

  • wk6at Arizona State0.3
  • wk7vs New Mexico0.2
  • wk12at Nevada0.2
  • wk4at Wyoming0.1
  • wk5vs San José State0.1
  • wk8at Northern Illinois0.1

Who to root for

Games Hawai'i is not in that move its odds most. Same units, much smaller scale.

  • wk8Middle Tennessee over Florida International0.1
  • wk13Nevada over UNLV0.1
  • wk3Purdue over UCLA0.1
  • wk6New Mexico State over Florida International0.1
  • wk7Boston College over Pittsburgh0.1
  • wk3Wake Forest over Miami0.1
The full playoff picture →

Mountain West

0-1 in league play, projected 4.4-3.65 of 10 by title odds
3.8%
Wins the Mountain West
11%
Reaches the title game

The Mountain West sends its top two by conference winning percentage, head-to-head breaking a tie. The last berth is level on percentage in 35% of simulated seasons, so a tiebreaker decides it about that often.

  • wk7New Mexico at Hawai'i9.4
  • wk12Hawai'i at Nevada7.5
  • wk5San José State at Hawai'i4.9
  • wk4Hawai'i at Wyoming4.8

Points of title probability riding on each result. The whole Mountain West race →

If not the playoff, then

70%
Bowl eligible
68%
Placed in a bowl
0.1%
In the playoff
32%
Season over in November

Hawai'i is 0-2 and needs 6 more wins from 10 games to reach the six that make a team eligible — at most one of which may come against an FCS opponent. In 2.3% of seasons they get there and still go nowhere: there are more eligible teams than seats.

  • Arizona Bowl18%
  • Famous Idaho Potato Bowl15%
  • New Mexico Bowl10%
  • Hawai'i Bowl7.8%
  • Cure Bowl5.5%
  • LA Bowl5.2%

Every bowl, and how each one picks →

Recruiting Pipelines

since 2010

Of the 170 high-school programs with a pipeline page here, 6 have sent Hawai'i a player since 2010 — 36 signees between them. Where they signed, not where they were offered, and not a complete list of Hawai'i's feeder schools: only these 170 have the outcome history to measure.

High schoolSignedDrafted
St. LouisHI130
Bishop GormanNV100
PunahouHI70
Corona CentennialCA30
San ClementeCA20
John TylerTX10
All 170 high-school pipelines →
✓/✗ = whether our pregame model picked the winner. Win % & projections from the Gridpex model. Data: CollegeFootballData.