Skip to content
Cam Barfield

#0Cam Barfield

Cam Barfield is a Pass-Catching Back for Hawai'i. Cam's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 114 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Cam Barfield's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
371 Rush yards4 Rush TD80 Carries4.6 Yards/carry
Receiving
27 Receptions257 Rec yards3 Rec TD9.5 Yards/rec
Returns
11 Kick returns316 KR yards1 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume36
  • Explosiveness32
  • Consistency22
  • Receiving92
Player type
Pass-Catching Back

Third-down weapon out of the backfield. Routes, hands, and separation in coverage define this role as much as rushing.

3rd-down backReceiving threatPass protection
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency22th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Peak game: 0.96 EPA/play in Wk 8 vs Colorado State (SP+ -16).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.9600.96Wk 1 vs Arizona: -0.33 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Sam Houston: +0.07 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Portland State: +0.52 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Fresno State: -0.09 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Air Force: +0.48 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Utah State: -0.11 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Colorado State: +0.96 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs San José State: -0.08 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs San Diego State: +0.17 EPA/play11Wk 13 vs UNLV: -0.15 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Wyoming: +0.08 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
0vsStanfordW23-20-11.86457.501100
1@ArizonaL6-4012.0461.50170-0.33
2vsSam HoustonW37-20-27.87294.101500.07
3vsPortland StateW23-3492.3045020.52
4vsFresno StateL21-231.85204.003150-0.09
5@Air ForceW44-35-3.25224.4136400.48
7vsUtah StateW44-26-3.1231.503170-0.11
8@Colorado StateW31-19-15.655611.2112100.96
10@San José StateL38-45-14.36152.512100-0.08
11vsSan Diego StateW38-66.711696.301800.17
13@UNLVL10-384.35102.003200-0.15
14vsWyomingW27-7-11.315775.1131710.08
20vsCaliforniaW35-31-3.25102.001130

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
12.6%
Passing plays
6.4%
Rushing plays
23.0%
Standard downs
14.8%
Passing downs
8.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.12
Passing downs
0.13
Pass / Rush EPA
0.33 / 0.03

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.