Skip to content

Arkansas Razorbacks

SEC·1-1·
Elo
1547#55
SP+
3.3#56
FPI
2.3
AP
NR
Nextvs Georgia · Wk 3Win prob 11%Model +19.0
Talent #36 (745.5)Recruiting class #4614% production returning

Roster · 119 players

FR 22SO 25JR 31SR 41
#PlayerPosClHtWt
2AJ HillQBSO6'4"232
7KJ JacksonQBJR6'4"225
10Cade TrotterQBJR6'1"189
14Hank HendrixQBFR6'3"190
16Braeden FullerQBSR6'3"221
0Braylen RussellRBJR6'1"227
5Sutton SmithRBSR5'9"196
21Jasper ParkerRBSO6'0"209
22TJ HodgesRBFR6'0"189
23Kevin YoungRBFR5'11"218
24Mario RobinsonRBSR6'0"210
25Markeylin BattonRBSO5'10"181
27Cam SettlesRBSO5'11"209
1Courtney CrutchfieldWRJR6'2"187
3CJ BrownWRJR6'1"195
4Ismael CisseWRSR6'0"198
6Chris MarshallWRSR6'3"213
8Donovan FaupelWRSR6'1"201
9Jamari HawkinsWRSR5'10"188
11Monte HarrisonWRJR6'3"222
13Jelani WatkinsWRJR5'11"163
18Jude HallWRFR6'5"200
19Antonio JordanWRSO6'6"228
80Dequane PrevoWRFR5'10"176
81Dai'shaun ThomasWRJR5'10"174
82Ben PupploWRSR6'2"187
86Maurice Gleaton Jr.WRSO5'10"170
87Cory Henderson Jr.WRSR6'0"186
88Blair Irvin IIIWRFR6'0"195
32Matt AdcockTESR6'3"258
35Hutson HendrixTESO5'9"237
47Maddox LassiterTESR6'3"248
49Braxton ScriberTESO6'1"250
83Jaden PlattTEJR6'5"255
84Breylen GilbertTESO6'3"235
85Ty LockwoodTESR6'4"246
89Gavin GarretsonTESO6'7"256
50Kobe BranhamOLJR6'5"336
52Caden KitlerOLSR6'3"303
53Kash CourtneyOLSO6'4"301
54Adam HawkesOLJR6'6"306
55Carey ClaytonOLFR6'3"282
56Ben MubengaOLFR6'5"289
60Jonas NantzeOLJR6'5"289
61Kaden BramlageOLFR6'5"296
62Alex JohnsonOLJR6'3"308
63Hugh SmithOLFR6'5"305
64Bryant WilliamsOLSR6'7"335
65Aaron SmithOLSR6'6"288
66Payton Parks-SmithOLSR6'5"305
67Emmanuel FlorOLSO6'4"334
70Daniel GreinOLSO6'5"324
71Malachi BrelandOLSR6'5"334
72Tucker YoungOLFR6'5"310
73Brooks EdmonsonOLSR6'4"313
74Terence Roberson Jr.OLJR6'6"322
75Kavion BroussardOLJR6'6"312
78Lucas PossentiOLJR6'5"309
79Josiah ClemonsOLSO6'7"341
0Hunter OsborneDLSR6'4"313
9Charlie CollinsDLJR6'5"233
11Jamonta WallerDLJR6'0"237
28Trajen OdomDLSO6'3"297
30J'Lynn AllenDLJR6'7"226
35Steven Soles Jr.DLJR6'2"237
40Colton YarbroughDLFR6'5"262
41Brian AlstonDLSR6'2"247
43Trent SellersDLFR6'4"269
52Donovan WhittenDLSR6'3"252
55Antonio Sandel-BascombDLSR6'3"315
88Xadavien SimsDLJR6'3"308
90Caleb BellDLSO6'3"284
91Carlon JonesDLJR6'2"327
92David OkeDLSR6'2"298
93Keiundre JohnsonDLSO6'3"292
94Reginald VaughnDLSO6'2"301
95Anthony Kennedy Jr.DLFR6'3"337
97Quincy Rhodes Jr.DLSR6'6"273
99Danny Beale IIIDLFR6'5"347
7Bradley ShawLBSO6'1"229
8Phoenix JacksonLBSR6'0"221
10Wyatt SimmonsLBJR6'3"226
25Ja'Quavion SmithLBJR6'1"229
33Jakore SmithLBFR6'0"205
42Jeremy EvansLBSR6'1"229
44Ben BogleLBSR6'1"226
45Preston DavisLBJR5'11"223
48Joseph WhittLBJR6'0"210
1Christian HarrisonDBSR6'0"202
2Shelton LewisDBSR5'11"190
3Braydon LeeDBJR6'1"180
4La'khi RolandDBJR6'2"195
6Khmori HouseDBJR6'1"202
13Carter StoutmireDBSR5'10"216
14Kyeaure MagloireDBSR6'3"210
15Nsongbeh GinyuiDBSO6'2"199
16Jathan HatchDBJR6'2"196
17DJ Hairston Jr.DBSO6'2"176
18John Howse IVDBSR6'1"198
19Kyndrick WilliamsDBFR6'1"188
20Joker JohnsonDBSR6'0"195
21Tyler ScottDBSR6'1"202
22Tay LockettDBFR6'0"185
23Ian WilliamsDBSO5'10"198
24Miguel MitchellDBSR6'1"219
26Jalon CopelandDBFR6'0"197
27LaMarcus Hicks IIDBSO6'2"190
29Brandon FordDBFR5'11"193
31Blake BriskerDBSO5'10"184
36Jeremiah WilliamsDBSR5'10"175
38Bradley Ume-EzeokeDBFR5'10"170
30Max GilbertPKSR6'0"201
39Braeden McAlisterPKSR6'0"196
46Charlie Von Der MedenPKJR6'0"183
34Jesse EhrlichPSR6'2"200
37Gavin RushPSO6'3"209
41Connor SmithPFR6'3"206
51Adam JohnstonLSSR6'0"225
59Max SchmidlyLSSR6'3"217

Team Statistics · per game, with national FBS rank

Points / game
20.5
scoring offense
Points allowed
28.5
scoring defense
Differential
-8.0
per game
Offense
Total yards / game
360.0#98
Yards / play
4.5#127
Passing yards / game
255.5#51
Rushing yards / game
104.5#118
First downs / game
25.0#29
3rd down %
50.0%#34
4th down %
50.0%#71
Time of possession
36:41#4
Defense
Yards allowed / game
297.5#54
Yards / play allowed
5.6#98
Pass yards allowed / game
207.0#69
Rush yards allowed / game
90.5#42
3rd down % allowed
31.6%#48
Sacks
3#79
Tackles for loss
9#91
Turnovers & Discipline
Turnover margin
-2#108
Takeaways
2#75
Giveaways
4#105
Penalties / game
7.5#90
Penalty yards / game
65.0#100

Rank is national among all FBS teams (#1 = best), oriented so higher rank = better even for defensive and discipline metrics. Bars show percentile.

Scouting Report · 2026 projection

pass-leaning

Arkansas throws it: Ryan Silverfield's offenses have been pass-leaning across 6 seasons. The strengths are offensive, led by 10th in the push up front. The way in is 128th at shutting down the ground game, and they are 126th at closing out passing downs.

On fourth down he goes for it more often than his peers do from the same spots (+5.9%). Against what the expected-points model recommends he is −19.4% — the profession as a whole is negative on this.

Arkansas has not played an FBS opponent yet, so this is the projection: last season regressed toward the mean, plus returning production, recruiting, talent and whether the staff is the same one.

Projected strengths

  • Offensethe push the line gets
    #10
    projected
  • Offensemoving the ball on the ground
    #13
    projected
  • Offensesurviving second and twelve
    #23
    projected

Projected soft spots

  • Defensemoving the ball on the ground
    #128
    projected
  • Defensesurviving second and twelve
    #126
    projected
  • Defensethrowing it
    #117
    projected

Each bar is where this team sits in the country. Before the season has produced enough football these are PROJECTIONS — last season regressed to the mean, plus talent, returning production, recruiting and whether the staff is the same one — and the season replaces them as it is played. Head coaches only — there is no free feed for coordinators, so on a program where the head coach does not call the offense this describes the staff he hired. Play-calling identity is a style, not a grade: throwing more than the situations warrant is not better than throwing less than they warrant.

2026 Season Projection

model win prob · 10 to play
3.88.2
projected final record (now 11)
Exp. wins left
2.8
of 10 games
Bowl odds
10%
reach 6 wins
Best odds
77%
vs Tulsa
Toughest
7%
vs Texas A&M

How the season could finish · 2026 · chance of each final win total · 10 games left

Every remaining game simulated from the model's win probability for it. Tallest bar is the single likeliest finish, not a prediction that it happens.

1234567891011
final winstallest bar = 30% chance
Likeliest finish 4-8 (30%)Bowl eligible 10% · marked on the axis at 6

Player Value

EPA contribution by position group + estimated NIL market value (derived from position rates and on-field production — not actual deal figures).

Unit Value — Total EPA
QBKJ Jackson
+21.5 EPA
WRMonte Harrison, Chris Marshall +6
+14.1 EPA
TETy Lockwood, Jaden Platt +1
+6.3 EPA
RBSutton Smith, Braylen Russell +2
-1.3 EPA

Total EPA produced by each positional group this season. OL value is captured via the rush/pass efficiency of skill players; OL-specific EPA isn't separately reported.

Estimated NIL Market Value
ESTIMATED
QBKJ Jackson
~$847K
EPA +21.50.291/play74 snaps
EPA +0.80.037/play22 snaps
RBSutton Smith
~$145K
EPA -5.3-0.189/play28 snaps

Estimated from position-group market rates and on-field EPA contribution. Actual NIL valuations depend on social media following, brand fit, and market negotiations — these figures are directional only.

The Five Factors

ranked vs. FBS · bar = better
Efficiency (PPA)
Off0.1425th#104
Def0.2512th#121
Explosiveness
Off1.0712th#122
Def1.3236th#89
Field position
Off72.072nd#40
Def66.295th#8
Finishing (pts/opp)
Off3.1521st#109
Def5.096th#130
Turnovers
Won 2Lost 4
Margin -2

Opponent-adjusted efficiency

EPA/play vs. schedule
Offense
Defense
Off · pass
0.3250th#69
Off · rush
-0.0314th#119

Pass vs. rush (PPA)

Rushing
Off-0.0315th#117
Def0.2216th#116
Passing
Off0.3250th#69
Def0.3130th#97

Trenches & disruption

Line yards (off)
2.70#109
2nd-level / open-field
0.74 / 0.15
Power / stuff (off)
75.0% / 19.7%
Havoc — total (def)
15.7%#68
Havoc — front 7 / DB
11.1% / 4.6%

Standard vs. passing downs

Pro
Std downs
Off-0.04
Def0.28
Pass downs
Off0.48
Def0.19

PPA on each down type (off vs. def).

Opponent-adjusted by down

Pro
1st2nd3rd
Offense-0.11#1190.07#990.74#41
Defense0.09#1040.58#1290.09#22

Elo Trajectory

North AlabamaFinal
Elo rating 15471479-68 over season

Team Fingerprint · 2026 · 31 opponent-adjusted metrics · percentile vs 138 FBS teams

Plot these →
worst in FBSbest

Efficiency

  • Offense EPA/play0.1842nd
  • Defense EPA/play allowed-0.0777th
  • Offense success rate52%72nd
  • Defense success rate allowed27%84th

Downs

  • Offense success — standard downs56%72nd
  • Offense success — passing downs44%75th
  • Defense success allowed — standard downs41%57th
  • Defense success allowed — passing downs6%97th

Explosiveness

  • Offense explosiveness0.949th
  • Defense explosiveness allowed1.177th
  • Offense explosiveness — standard downs0.654th
  • Offense explosiveness — passing downs1.838th

Trenches

  • Offense line yards2.623rd
  • Defense line yards allowed1.882nd
  • Offense highlight yards0.1313th
  • Defense highlight yards allowed0.1677th
  • Offense power success0.7853rd
  • Defense power success allowed0.0099th
  • Offense stuff rate0.2224th
  • Defense stuff rate0.2677th

Third down

  • Third down conversion63%88th
  • Third down distance faced5.583rd
  • Third down conversion allowed10%96th
  • Third down distance forced10.398th

Halves

  • Net success rate — first half0.2775th
  • Net success rate — second half0.2682nd

Roster

  • Returning usage20%21st
  • Returning EPA65.734th
  • Team talent composite74574th
  • Recruiting class rank46.067th
  • Recruiting class points21367th

Every metric is opponent-adjusted and ranked so that higher is always better — a defensive rate that is good when low is ranked accordingly. Sack and tackle-for-loss composition are deliberately absent: their relationship to team quality is a measured null, so they carry a style rather than a rank, and they appear in the pressure signature instead.

Intelligence Report

Offensive DNA

Pass-dominant offense — below average EPA/play nationally
EPA/play
+0.138#104 · below avg
Pass EPA/play
+0.324#69
Rush EPA/play
-0.033#117
Explosiveness
1.073#122
Pts/opportunity
3.15#109
Success rate
44.9%

Pass efficiency edge: 0.357 EPA/play

🛡

Defensive Identity

Disruptive defense — allowing above-average EPA/play
EPA/play allowed
+0.253#121 · bottom 20%
Havoc rate (total)
15.7%#68
Front-7 havoc
11.1%
DB havoc
4.6%
Big play rate allowed
1.316#89
Success rate allowed
42.0%

Disruption comes primarily from the front seven.

📊

Season Signature

20.5 PPG offense, 28.5 allowed — -8.0 margin/game
Points per game
20.5
Points allowed/game
28.5
Scoring margin/game
-8.0
Turnover margin
-2won 2 · lost 4
Production returning
14%
Talent rank (247)
#36

1-1 record through 2 games.

Team Shape · percentile vs. FBS · dashed = 50th

OFFENSE25thEXPLOSIVENESS12thFINISHING21thFIELD POS72thDEFENSE12thHAVOC51th50th100th
Offense
25th
Explosiveness
12th
Finishing
21th
Field Pos
72th
Defense
12th
Havoc
51th

Each axis = national percentile rank. 100th = best in FBS, 0th = worst. Defense and Havoc are oriented so higher = better.

CORE efficiency · situation and opponent removed

Points per 100 plays above average, after the game state is regressed out of every snap and the schedule is solved out across the whole league. The version of this team’s efficiency that can be compared to a team it never played.

Overall
+6.0
#49
Offense
+7.8
#26
Defense
+1.7
#90
Full CORE ratings →

National Landscape · 2026 FBS · offense vs. defense EPA/play

Each dot = one FBS team. Arkansas is highlighted. Tap or hover a dot for details.

ELITEDEF. FORTRESSOFF. POWERHOUSEREBUILDING-0.100.00+0.10+0.20+0.30-0.050.00+0.10+0.20Offensive EPA/play← worsebetter →Defensive EPA allowed/play← worsebetter →

Similar Programs

Teams with the closest offense + defense efficiency profile to Arkansas in 2026

by EPA/play distance
RutgersSP+ -3.6
Off EPA/play +0.124Def EPA/play +0.234Elo 1372
Match
99%
WisconsinSP+ -1.5
Off EPA/play +0.114Def EPA/play +0.235Elo 1475
Match
98%
East CarolinaSP+ -8.1
Off EPA/play +0.174Def EPA/play +0.257Elo 1477
Match
98%
Michigan StateSP+ +1.0
Off EPA/play +0.141Def EPA/play +0.192Elo 1468
Match
97%
MinnesotaSP+ +9.6
Off EPA/play +0.130Def EPA/play +0.191Elo 1510
Match
96%
AkronSP+ -21.4
Off EPA/play +0.190Def EPA/play +0.228Elo 929
Match
96%

Similarity = normalized Euclidean distance on season offensive and defensive EPA/play. Teams within ±0.02 EPA/play on both units score >90%.

Program Trajectory · CORE rating · 20152026 · points per game vs an average FBS team

2015: +18.4, #13 of 1282016: +5.5, #44 of 1282017: -3.9, #74 of 1302018: -2.5, #79 of 1302019: -16.4, #112 of 1302020: +4.3, #47 of 1242021: +19.4, #8 of 1302022: +3.8, #54 of 1312023: +0.2, #61 of 1332024: +17.0, #15 of 1342025: +10.7, #37 of 1362026: +6.0, #49 of 138
20152026
Now +6.0 · #49 of 138Best +19.4 in 2021Worst -16.4 in 2019

Program History

recent seasons
YearOverallConfWin %xWLuck
20261-00-0
100%
1.0+0.0
20252-100-8
17%
5.2-3.2
20247-63-5
54%
7.9-0.9
20234-81-7
33%
5.5-1.5
20227-63-5
54%
8.5-1.5
20219-44-4
69%
9.2-0.2
20203-73-7
30%
5.9-2.9
20192-100-8
17%
2.3-0.3
20182-100-8
17%
3.2-1.2
20174-81-7
33%
4.8-0.8

xW = expected wins from per-game dominance. Luck = actual − expected (positive = won close games).

2.2%of 50,000 simulated 2026 seasons end with them in the field

0-0 so far, projected to finish 4.2-7.8.

If they finish with…

99%
2 losses
61%
3 losses
2.0%
4 losses

Their chance of making it at each final loss count. Better than even up to 3.

up 0.1 points since preseason.

  • At 3 losses they are 61% where the average SEC team is 41%.
  • The SEC takes 3.83 bids in an average season, and four or more in 65%.

Arkansas’s own turning points

Points of playoff probability between winning and losing.

  • wk12at Texas12.3
  • wk13vs LSU9.4
  • wk5at Texas A&M8.7
  • wk3vs Georgia8.1
  • wk6vs Tennessee5.4
  • wk11vs South Carolina5.3

Who to root for

Games Arkansas is not in that move its odds most. Same units, much smaller scale.

  • wk3Cincinnati over Miami (OH)0.7
  • wk11Middle Tennessee over Liberty0.7
  • wk7Florida State over Miami0.7
  • wk7Mississippi State over LSU0.6
  • wk4Delaware over Virginia0.6
  • wk10Toledo over Sacramento State0.6
The full playoff picture →

SEC

0-0 in league play, projected 2.2-6.816 of 16 by title odds
0.1%
Wins the SEC
0.5%
Reaches the title game

The SEC sends its top two by conference winning percentage, head-to-head breaking a tie. The last berth is level on percentage in 48% of simulated seasons, so a tiebreaker decides it about that often.

  • wk12Arkansas at Texas1.2

Points of title probability riding on each result. The whole SEC race →

If not the playoff, then

25%
Bowl eligible
25%
Placed in a bowl
2.2%
In the playoff
73%
Season over in November

Arkansas is 1-0 and needs 5 more wins from 11 games to reach the six that make a team eligible — at most one of which may come against an FCS opponent. In 1.9% they go with five wins, as a 5-7 fill-in — which in reality is decided by academic progress rate, not by anything modelled here.

  • Texas Bowl3.8%
  • Music City Bowl3.5%
  • Liberty Bowl3.4%
  • Duke's Mayo Bowl2.8%
  • Birmingham Bowl2.8%
  • Gator Bowl2.2%

Every bowl, and how each one picks →

Recruiting Pipelines

since 2010

Of the 170 high-school programs with a pipeline page here, 14 have sent Arkansas a player since 2010 — 33 signees between them. Where they signed, not where they were offered, and not a complete list of Arkansas's feeder schools: only these 170 have the outcome history to measure.

High schoolSignedDrafted
Booker T. WashingtonFL60
Mansfield LegacyTX41
HebronTX31
Archbishop RummelLA30
ConwayAR30
ColumbiaFL21
Cedar GroveGA20
Evangel Christian AcademyLA20
All 170 high-school pipelines →
✓/✗ = whether our pregame model picked the winner. Win % & projections from the Gridpex model. Data: CollegeFootballData.