Skip to content
KJ Jackson

#7KJ Jackson

KJ Jackson is a Dual-Threat QB for Arkansas. KJ's 2025 season produced 26.0 total EPA across 48 plays.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So KJ Jackson's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Passing
33/54 Comp/Att441 Pass yards3 Pass TD0 INT61.1% Comp %
Rushing
52 Rush yards2 Rush TD11 Carries4.7 Yards/carry

Air yards

Where the ball goes, and how much of the gain is the throw rather than the run after it.

34
Attempts
4.1y
Avg depth
8.8y
After catch
71%
Catch rate

The ball travels 4.1 yards in the air on an average throw 3.7 yards shorter than the median. Another 8.8 comes after the catch.

Where he throws

attempts · completion rate · yards
deep
1
0% · 0y
0
0
short
15
93% · 169y
6
83% · 49y
12
42% · 49y
leftmiddleright

Depth and direction come from CFBD’s passing detail, which is backfilled after the games: this covers weeks 1–2 only. Spikes, throwaways and intentional grounding are excluded before any average.

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency95
  • Volume55
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency71
  • Clutch100
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)95th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency71th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among QBs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 1.83 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Arkansas State (SP+ -9).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.8301.83Wk 1 vs Alabama A&M: +0.54 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Arkansas State: +1.83 EPA/play2Wk 8 vs Texas A&M: -0.10 EPA/play8Wk 13 vs Texas: +0.54 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Missouri: +0.51 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsAlabama A&MW52-72/4361043.21500.54
2vsArkansas StateW56-14-8.83/3700099.7611.83
8vsTexas A&ML42-4520.71/13006.1-0.10
13@TexasL37-5216.216/292061084.41710.54
14vsMissouriL17-3114.411/171261087.71400.51

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
19.2%
Passing plays
29.6%
Rushing plays
6.2%
Standard downs
15.9%
Passing downs
26.2%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.21
Passing downs
0.90
Pass / Rush EPA
0.46 / 1.16

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.
Kj Jackson Stats, EPA & Player Profile — Arkansas · Gridpex