Skip to content

LSU Tigers

SEC·2-0·
Elo
1745#20
SP+
23.3#9
FPI
24.1
AP
#8
Next@ Ole Miss · Wk 3Win prob 22%Model +11.3
Talent #8 (931.8)Recruiting class #1121% production returning

Roster · 113 players

FR 37SO 29JR 34SR 13
#PlayerPosClHtWt
8Husan LongstreetQBFR6'1"195
10Sam LeavittQBJR6'2"216
11Landen ClarkQBSO6'0"195
19Kaden MartinQBSR5'11"231
21Cayden JonesQBFR5'10"172
13Dilin JonesRBSO5'11"211
22Harlem BerryRBSO5'10"187
23Stacy GageRBSO5'10"206
24Joseph EbunRBJR5'11"191
25Rod Gainey Jr.RBSO5'9"183
27Raycine Guillory Jr.RBFR5'10"179
29Caden DurhamRBJR5'9"200
1Jayce BrownWRSR5'11"175
2Tre' BrownWRJR6'2"190
3Eugene Wilson IIIWRJR5'11"190
4Jackson HarrisWRJR6'2"202
6Winston Watkins Jr.WRSO5'10"182
15Phillip Wright IIIWRFR6'0"171
26Nolon BuckelsWRFR5'8"190
80Brayden AllenWRFR6'2"197
82Roman MothershedWRJR6'5"208
83Corey Barber Jr.WRFR5'11"188
84Tyree HollowayWRJR5'10"174
85Josh JacksonWRSO6'2"199
86Jabari MackWRFR6'0"195
88Malik ElzyWRJR6'2"214
7Trey'Dez GreenTEJR6'7"237
12Malachi ThomasTEJR6'3"242
44Zach GraceTEJR6'2"236
46James LarsonTESO6'4"235
47JD LaFleurTEFR6'6"254
81Landon CraigTESO6'3"230
87JC AndersonTEFR6'6"256
50William Satterwhite IIOLSO6'3"293
51Ryan MiretOLFR6'4"300
52Ja'Quan SprinkleOLJR6'4"297
53Hayes FuquaOLFR6'6"281
54Ja'Mard Jones Jr.OLSO6'2"312
55Aliou BahOLSR6'5"327
61Braelin MooreOLSR6'2"301
67Bo BordelonOLSR6'6"305
68Brett BordelonOLFR6'4"276
73Adrian LambOLSO6'5"290
74Braden AugustusOLJR6'1"313
76Christian StampsOLJR6'0"326
57JaKolby JonesOTJR6'5"298
65Sean Thompkins Jr.OTJR6'5"308
66Solomon ThomasOTFR6'3"320
69Darrin StreyOTFR6'7"314
70Devin HarperOTSO6'4"312
71Brysten MartinezOTFR6'5"318
75Weston DavisOTSO6'6"315
77Jordan SeatonOTJR6'5"307
1Princewill UmanmielenDESR6'4"244
17Damien ShanklinDEFR6'5"254
19Gabriel RelifordDESO6'3"270
29Jordan RossDEJR6'5"246
48Kolaj CobbinsDESO6'3"234
55Lamar BrownDEFR6'4"295
91Trenton HendersonDEFR6'4"243
93Jaylen BrownDESO6'6"270
97Dylan CarpenterDEJR6'3"252
44Junior TuihalamakaDLSR6'2"260
47Malik BloctonDTJR6'3"286
87Joey AugustDTJR6'0"282
88Richard AndersonDTFR6'3"339
90Stephiylan GreenDTJR6'3"296
92Brandon BrownDTFR6'1"287
95Shone WashingtonDTSR6'4"294
96Dominick McKinleyDTJR6'6"297
98Achilles WoodsDTSO6'3"292
99Deuce GeraldsDTFR6'1"279
6TJ DotteryLBSR6'2"225
7Whit WeeksLBSR6'3"223
15Jaiden BrakerLBFR6'3"223
24Tylen SingletonLBSO6'1"227
26Charles Ross IILBSO6'1"218
31CJ JimcoilyLBSO6'3"218
32Keylan MosesLBFR6'2"212
35Zach WeeksLBFR6'3"230
42Davhon KeysLBJR6'0"227
49Theo GraceLBFR6'2"231
56Jake IbietaLBJR6'0"237
5DJ PickettCBSO6'4"189
8Ja'Keem JacksonCBJR6'0"188
11PJ WoodlandCBJR5'11"164
21Michael Turner Jr.CBSO6'1"162
22Havon Finney Jr.CBFR6'1"173
23Aidan AndingCBSO5'11"170
27Dez EllisCBFR6'2"180
30Treylan JamesCBJR6'1"183
36Emari PetersonCBFR6'1"198
37Craig Walton Jr.CBJR5'11"174
39Lavonte WilliamsDBSO6'3"180
46Seth KnotheDBSR6'1"214
0Tamarcus CooleySJR6'0"206
2Ty BenefieldSSR6'3"208
10Dashawn SpearsSJR6'3"209
13Faheem DelaneSSO6'2"213
16John HurleySSR5'11"179
25Aiden HallSFR6'2"193
28Jhase ThomasSFR6'1"175
33Isaiah WashingtonSFR6'2"175
34Mason DossettSSO6'0"187
38Jackson WilliamsSFR6'2"180
32Gavin HigginsPKFR5'11"189
36Aidan CorbelloPKJR5'9"199
45Sean PerretPKFR5'10"190
80Scott StarzykPKSO5'9"175
90Grant ChadwickPJR6'5"213
99Hayden CraigPFR6'1"206
39Mack MulhernLSFR6'1"224
43Silas HallLSSO6'3"216

Team Statistics · per game, with national FBS rank

Points / game
48.0
scoring offense
Points allowed
12.0
scoring defense
Differential
+36.0
per game
Offense
Total yards / game
644.0#4
Yards / play
6.9#40
Passing yards / game
335.0#18
Rushing yards / game
309.0#8
First downs / game
38.0#1
3rd down %
68.8%#4
4th down %
100.0%#1
Time of possession
36:09#10
Defense
Yards allowed / game
145.0#6
Yards / play allowed
3.0#11
Pass yards allowed / game
105.0#11
Rush yards allowed / game
40.0#8
3rd down % allowed
7.7%#5
Sacks
4#42
Tackles for loss
11#41
Turnovers & Discipline
Turnover margin
0#66
Takeaways
1#88
Giveaways
1#31
Penalties / game
6.0#52
Penalty yards / game
75.0#116

Rank is national among all FBS teams (#1 = best), oriented so higher rank = better even for defensive and discipline metrics. Bars show percentile.

Scouting Report · 2026 projection

balanced

LSU is in year 1 under Lane Kiffin, whose offenses have been balanced. The strengths are defensive, led by 7th at stuffing runs at the line. The way in is 132nd at staying out of the backfield, and they are 105th at keeping a clean pocket.

On fourth down he goes for it more often than his peers do from the same spots (+11.8%). Against what the expected-points model recommends he is −8.1% — the profession as a whole is negative on this.

LSU has played 1 game against an average slate, adjusted for here. That football carries about 0% of what is below; the rest is still the preseason projection.

Projected strengths

  • Defensegetting stopped at the line
    #7
    projected
  • Defenserunning it
    #17
    projected
  • Defensethrowing it
    #23
    projected

Projected soft spots

  • Offensegetting stopped at the line
    #132
    projected
  • Offensesacks and tackles for loss
    #105
    projected

Each bar is where this team sits in the country. Before the season has produced enough football these are PROJECTIONS — last season regressed to the mean, plus talent, returning production, recruiting and whether the staff is the same one — and the season replaces them as it is played. Head coaches only — there is no free feed for coordinators, so on a program where the head coach does not call the offense this describes the staff he hired. Play-calling identity is a style, not a grade: throwing more than the situations warrant is not better than throwing less than they warrant.

2026 Season Projection

model win prob · 9 to play
7.33.7
projected final record (now 20)
Exp. wins left
5.3
of 9 games
Bowl odds
91%
reach 6 wins
Best odds
82%
vs Kentucky
Toughest
22%
vs Ole Miss

How the season could finish · 2026 · chance of each final win total · 9 games left

Every remaining game simulated from the model's win probability for it. Tallest bar is the single likeliest finish, not a prediction that it happens.

234567891011
final winstallest bar = 29% chance
Likeliest finish 7-4 (29%)Bowl eligible 91% · marked on the axis at 6

Player Value

EPA contribution by position group + estimated NIL market value (derived from position rates and on-field production — not actual deal figures).

Unit Value — Total EPA
QBSam Leavitt
+16.7 EPA
WREugene Wilson, Jackson Harris +2
+6.5 EPA
TETrey'Dez Green
+4.5 EPA
RBStacy Gage, Dilin Jones
+4.2 EPA

Total EPA produced by each positional group this season. OL value is captured via the rush/pass efficiency of skill players; OL-specific EPA isn't separately reported.

Estimated NIL Market Value
ESTIMATED
QBSam Leavitt
~$794K
EPA +16.70.465/play36 snaps
RBDilin Jones
~$195K
EPA +4.20.200/play21 snaps

Estimated from position-group market rates and on-field EPA contribution. Actual NIL valuations depend on social media following, brand fit, and market negotiations — these figures are directional only.

The Five Factors

ranked vs. FBS · bar = better
Efficiency (PPA)
Off0.3874th#36
Def-0.4999th#1
Explosiveness
Off1.2446th#75
Def0.9991st#14
Field position
Off72.974th#36
Def74.036th#89
Finishing (pts/opp)
Off4.0950th#70
Def3.3350th#70
Turnovers
Won 1Lost 1
Margin 0

Opponent-adjusted efficiency

EPA/play vs. schedule
Offense
Defense
Off · pass
0.3353rd#66
Off · rush
0.4184th#23

Pass vs. rush (PPA)

Rushing
Off0.4182nd#25
Def-0.5399th#1
Passing
Off0.3350th#70
Def-0.5599th#1

Trenches & disruption

Line yards (off)
4.05#15
2nd-level / open-field
1.86 / 1.00
Power / stuff (off)
100.0% / 2.7%
Havoc — total (def)
28.0%#6
Havoc — front 7 / DB
22.0% / 6.0%

Standard vs. passing downs

Pro
Std downs
Off0.10
Def-0.47
Pass downs
Off1.01
Def-0.51

PPA on each down type (off vs. def).

Opponent-adjusted by down

Pro
1st2nd3rd
Offense-0.09#1110.66#141.14#12
Defense-0.21#39-0.39#10-1.10#1

Elo Trajectory

ClemsonFinal
Elo rating 16161806+190 over season

Team Fingerprint · 2026 · 43 opponent-adjusted metrics · percentile vs 138 FBS teams

Plot these →
worst in FBSbest

Efficiency

  • Offense EPA/play0.4276th
  • Defense EPA/play allowed-0.2796th
  • Offense success rate54%74th
  • Defense success rate allowed24%88th

Downs

  • Offense success — standard downs52%56th
  • Offense success — passing downs58%93rd
  • Defense success allowed — standard downs39%64th
  • Defense success allowed — passing downs5%98th

Explosiveness

  • Offense explosiveness1.372nd
  • Defense explosiveness allowed0.9588th
  • Offense explosiveness — standard downs1.156th
  • Offense explosiveness — passing downs2.053rd

Trenches

  • Offense line yards3.576th
  • Defense line yards allowed1.979th
  • Offense highlight yards0.7140th
  • Defense highlight yards allowed0.0585th
  • Offense power success0.7853rd
  • Defense power success allowed0.6761st
  • Offense stuff rate0.0985th
  • Defense stuff rate0.3289th

Third down

  • Third down conversion69%96th
  • Third down distance faced4.397th
  • Third down conversion allowed8%97th
  • Third down distance forced9.692nd

Halves

  • Net success rate — first half0.4191st
  • Net success rate — second half0.1260th

Drives

  • Points per drive4.185th
  • Points per drive allowed0.2593rd
  • Average starting field position2745th
  • Opponent starting field position2663rd
  • Available yards gained71%88th
  • Available yards allowed18%98th
  • Scoring opportunities per drive91%75th
  • Scoring opportunities allowed83%42nd
  • Points per scoring opportunity4.587th
  • Points allowed per opportunity1.089th
  • Three-and-out rate9%88th
  • Three-and-outs forced50%91st

Roster

  • Returning usage27%28th
  • Returning EPA42.923rd
  • Team talent composite93295th
  • Recruiting class rank11.093rd
  • Recruiting class points27393rd

Every metric is opponent-adjusted and ranked so that higher is always better — a defensive rate that is good when low is ranked accordingly. Sack and tackle-for-loss composition are deliberately absent: their relationship to team quality is a measured null, so they carry a style rather than a rank, and they appear in the pressure signature instead.

Intelligence Report

Offensive DNA

Run-first offense performing above the national average
EPA/play
+0.376#36 · above avg
Pass EPA/play
+0.328#70
Rush EPA/play
+0.408#25
Explosiveness
1.242#75
Pts/opportunity
4.09#70
Success rate
53.2%

Rush efficiency edge: 0.079 EPA/play

🛡

Defensive Identity

High-pressure defense — top 1 nationally in EPA/play allowed
EPA/play allowed
-0.490#1 · elite
Havoc rate (total)
28.0%#6
Front-7 havoc
22.0%
DB havoc
6.0%
Big play rate allowed
0.988#14
Success rate allowed
12.9%

Disruption comes primarily from the front seven.

📊

Season Signature

48.0 PPG offense, 12.0 allowed — +36.0 margin/game
Points per game
48.0
Points allowed/game
12.0
Scoring margin/game
+36.0
Turnover margin
+0won 1 · lost 1
Production returning
21%
Talent rank (247)
#8

2-0 record through 2 games.

Team Shape · percentile vs. FBS · dashed = 50th

OFFENSE74thEXPLOSIVENESS46thFINISHING50thFIELD POS74thDEFENSE100thHAVOC96th50th100th
Offense
74th
Explosiveness
46th
Finishing
50th
Field Pos
74th
Defense
100th
Havoc
96th

Each axis = national percentile rank. 100th = best in FBS, 0th = worst. Defense and Havoc are oriented so higher = better.

CORE efficiency · situation and opponent removed

Points per 100 plays above average, after the game state is regressed out of every snap and the schedule is solved out across the whole league. The version of this team’s efficiency that can be compared to a team it never played.

Overall
+27.8
#4
Offense
+5.4
#34
Defense
-22.4
#1
Full CORE ratings →

What a possession is worth · 11 drives

MeasureOffenseDefense
Points per drive4.090.25
Starting field positionown 27.3own 26.1
Available yards71.4%17.6%
Scoring opportunities90.9%83.3%
Points per opportunity4.501.00
Three-and-out rate9.1%50.0%
Every team’s drive efficiency →

Play-calling identity

Against what the league calls from the same down, distance, field position, score and clock — so this is the staff, not the game script.

Pass rate
37.7%
Expected, given the spots
46.5%
Over expected
-8.8
Fourth down vs peers
-45
Fourth down vs the model
-67
All play-calling tendencies →

National Landscape · 2026 FBS · offense vs. defense EPA/play

Each dot = one FBS team. LSU is highlighted. Tap or hover a dot for details.

ELITEDEF. FORTRESSOFF. POWERHOUSEREBUILDING-0.100.00+0.10+0.20+0.30-0.050.00+0.10+0.20Offensive EPA/play← worsebetter →Defensive EPA allowed/play← worsebetter →

Similar Programs

Teams with the closest offense + defense efficiency profile to LSU in 2026

by EPA/play distance
North Dakota StateSP+ +2.6
Off EPA/play +0.296Def EPA/play -0.404Elo 1562
Match
94%
IowaSP+ +18.0
Off EPA/play +0.332Def EPA/play -0.330Elo 1847
Match
91%
Georgia SouthernSP+ -5.8
Off EPA/play +0.363Def EPA/play -0.315Elo 1376
Match
91%
Kennesaw StateSP+ -7.4
Off EPA/play +0.486Def EPA/play -0.253Elo 1373
Match
86%
Air ForceSP+ +1.1
Off EPA/play +0.371Def EPA/play -0.215Elo 1424
Match
85%
Kansas StateSP+ +12.7
Off EPA/play +0.314Def EPA/play -0.219Elo 1616
Match
85%

Similarity = normalized Euclidean distance on season offensive and defensive EPA/play. Teams within ±0.02 EPA/play on both units score >90%.

Program Trajectory · CORE rating · 20152026 · points per game vs an average FBS team

2015: +22.4, #7 of 1282016: +30.9, #4 of 1282017: +18.7, #15 of 1302018: +20.6, #9 of 1302019: +50.8, #1 of 1302020: -8.3, #91 of 1242021: +7.0, #48 of 1302022: +26.9, #5 of 1312023: +21.8, #10 of 1332024: +13.1, #30 of 1342025: +8.1, #45 of 1362026: +27.8, #4 of 138
20152026
Now +27.8 · #4 of 138Best +50.8 in 2019Worst -8.3 in 2020

Program History

recent seasons
YearOverallConfWin %xWLuck
20261-00-0
100%
1.0+0.0
20257-63-5
54%
6.4+0.6
20249-45-3
69%
7.1+1.9
202310-36-2
77%
8.9+1.1
202210-46-3
71%
8.9+1.1
20216-73-5
46%
7.2-1.2
20205-55-5
50%
3.1+1.9
201915-09-0
100%
14.6+0.4
201810-35-3
77%
9.8+0.2
20179-46-2
69%
9.3-0.3

xW = expected wins from per-game dominance. Luck = actual − expected (positive = won close games).

59%of 50,000 simulated 2026 seasons end with them in the field

1-0 so far, projected to finish 9.8-2.6. Top-four bye in 27%. Wins the SEC in 21%.

If they finish with…

100%
0 losses
100%
1 loss
97%
2 losses
35%
3 losses
0.3%
4 losses

Their chance of making it at each final loss count. Better than even up to 2.

Win out and it is 100%. Running the table settles it.

up 26.0 points since preseasonwon 51-10 over Clemson against an expected margin of +10, so +31.3 against the number.

  • At 3 losses they are 35% where the average SEC team is 41%.
  • The SEC takes 3.83 bids in an average season, and four or more in 65%.

LSU’s own turning points

Points of playoff probability between winning and losing.

  • wk4vs Texas A&M40.1
  • wk10vs Alabama40.0
  • wk3at Ole Miss39.9
  • wk11vs Texas39.7
  • wk7vs Mississippi State38.8
  • wk13at Arkansas38.3

Who to root for

Games LSU is not in that move its odds most. Same units, much smaller scale.

  • wk9Mississippi State over Texas4.4
  • wk4Wisconsin over Penn State2.6
  • wk5Clemson over Miami2.5
  • wk9Purdue over Penn State2.2
  • wk7Florida over Texas2.2
  • wk13Clemson over South Carolina2.0
The full playoff picture →

SEC

0-0 in league play, projected 6.6-2.42 of 16 by title odds
21%
Wins the SEC
39%
Reaches the title game

The SEC sends its top two by conference winning percentage, head-to-head breaking a tie. The last berth is level on percentage in 48% of simulated seasons, so a tiebreaker decides it about that often.

  • wk11Texas at LSU24.6
  • wk4Texas A&M at LSU21.0
  • wk10Alabama at LSU20.5
  • wk12LSU at Tennessee19.4

Points of title probability riding on each result. The whole SEC race →

If not the playoff, then

98%
Bowl eligible
40%
Placed in a bowl
59%
In the playoff
1.5%
Season over in November

LSU is 1-0 and needs 5 more wins from 11 games to reach the six that make a team eligible — at most one of which may come against an FCS opponent.

  • Citrus Bowl9.4%
  • ReliaQuest Bowl7.5%
  • Gator Bowl6.2%
  • Duke's Mayo Bowl4.9%
  • Music City Bowl3.8%
  • Texas Bowl2.9%

Every bowl, and how each one picks →

Recruiting Pipelines

since 2010

Of the 170 high-school programs with a pipeline page here, 22 have sent LSU a player since 2010 — 73 signees between them. Where they signed, not where they were offered, and not a complete list of LSU's feeder schools: only these 170 have the outcome history to measure.

High schoolSignedDrafted
Edna KarrLA92
Baton Rouge CatholicLA73
St. AugustineLA63
Evangel Christian AcademyLA50
Archbishop RummelLA42
NevilleLA42
John CurtisLA41
ParkwayLA41
All 170 high-school pipelines →
✓/✗ = whether our pregame model picked the winner. Win % & projections from the Gridpex model. Data: CollegeFootballData.