Skip to content
Rasheen Ali

#22Rasheen Ali

RB·Marshall·202320214.7 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Rasheen Ali is a 2-year Featured Back for Marshall. Rasheen's 2021 season ranks in the 98th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 165 plays — a elite rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Rasheen Ali's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2021 Production

Rushing
1401 Rush yards23 Rush TD250 Carries5.6 Yards/carry
Receiving
46 Receptions342 Rec yards1 Rec TD7.4 Yards/rec
Returns
1 Kick returns97 KR yards1 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2021 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency98
  • Volume85
  • Explosiveness52
  • Consistency87
  • Receiving54
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)98th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency87th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among RBs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.27 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 0.77 EPA/play in Wk 12 vs Charlotte (SP+ -14).

NIL Market Tier· 2021

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Travis EtienneClemson0.4704.7100.1
Clyde Edwards-HelaireLSU0.4905.0105.8
Devon JohnsonMarshall0.5206.0108.2
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.4505.8102.6
Tyjae SpearsTulane0.4505.7105.3

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.7700.77Wk 1 vs Navy: +0.61 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs North Carolina Central: +0.32 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs East Carolina: +0.61 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs App State: +0.15 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Middle Tennessee: +0.20 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs North Texas: +0.45 EPA/play7Wk 12 vs Charlotte: +0.77 EPA/play12Wk 1 vs Louisiana: +0.53 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1@NavyW49-7-8.514594.240.61
2vsNorth Carolina CentralW44-108455.6095510.32
3vsEast CarolinaL38-420.5241897.931800.61
4@App StateL30-3110.317834.9121000.15
5@Middle TennesseeL28-34-4.0191135.9364800.20
6vsOld DominionW20-13-7.421773.704160
7@North TexasW49-21-6.5201095.5215000.45
9vsFlorida InternationalW38-0-21.6261335.123150
10@Florida AtlanticW28-13-5.218905.026700
11vsUABL14-219.116412.603240
12@CharlotteW49-28-13.7232038.8332400.77
13vsWestern KentuckyL21-5313.324994.107170
1vsLouisianaL21-368.7201608.031500.53

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
29.7%
Passing plays
8.9%
Rushing plays
52.3%
Standard downs
34.4%
Passing downs
17.2%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.41
Passing downs
0.81
Pass / Rush EPA
0.35 / 0.50

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.850−0.122023
EPA per play · 2021 — 2023 · 20 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2021Marshall
4.7
83.2
2023Marshall
2.6
55.4

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.