Skip to content

Marshall Thundering Herd

Sun Belt·1-1·
Elo
1389#94
SP+
-14.4#117
FPI
-13.5
AP
NR
Next@ Missouri State · Wk 3Win prob 60%Model -3.8
Talent #97 (594.7)Recruiting class #12399% production returning

Roster · 105 players

FR 43SO 18JR 22SR 22
#PlayerPosClHtWt
1Zion TurnerQBSR6'1"212
4Khalil WilkinsQBSO6'4"211
7Carlos Del Rio-WilsonQBSR6'2"225
12Koi FaganQBFR6'0"190
17Dylan BarberQBFR5'11"194
6Jo'Shon BarbieRBSR5'9"188
10Judah PriceRBSO5'9"178
21TJ LesterRBSO5'9"205
22Anthony Quinn Jr.RBFR6'0"196
0De'Andre TamarezWRSR5'11"172
2Adrian NortonWRSR6'0"199
3Chris CulliverWRJR6'1"195
5Xayvion Turner-BradshawWRSR5'10"166
8Sherone White Jr.WRSO5'8"165
9Christian HamiltonWRJR5'11"186
11Drew WilliamsWRFR6'2"196
13Brennan ChambersWRFR6'3"186
15Josiah McLaurinWRSO6'1"186
16Jalyn AbercrombieWRFR5'11"183
18Justin HaggertyWRJR5'9"169
19Tony MartinWRJR5'10"174
20Owen SweeneyWRSO6'3"204
23Chase MasseyWRSO6'1"175
24Aiden BurkeWRFR6'0"182
84Nico WiedmannWRSO6'2"194
80Shawn RouseTEJR6'3"244
81Toby PayneTESR6'4"237
85Tracy StephensTEJR6'4"242
86Brandon HettwerTEFR6'4"234
50Jae'Von WhiteOLFR6'5"293
52Rhett McGrewOLFR6'2"264
53Mason RamseyOLFR6'1"261
54Drake LanhamOLFR6'3"281
55Holden GriegerOLSO6'7"315
56Andrew DudleyOLFR6'3"292
57Logan GreerOLJR6'2"287
59Evan FergusonOLSR6'2"297
61Da'Ron ParksOLFR6'5"340
62Marwan DiabOLFR6'3"286
64Jaquez JoinerOLFR6'1"285
65Parker BraultOLFR6'2"286
66Eli KaufmanOLFR6'4"300
67Jack LairdOLFR6'6"314
69William SandfossOLFR6'5"297
70Jalen SlappyOLSR6'4"312
73Robby MartinOLSO6'4"304
74Justyn LylesOLFR6'3"245
76Tariq MontgomeryOLSR6'6"312
77Isaac ClaryOLJR6'7"337
78Xavier BausleyOLSR6'4"318
7Kelvon McBrideEDGEJR6'2"242
21Keydel PainterEDGEJR6'3"243
14Mickel WilliamsDLSR6'3"290
24Jacarius ClaytonDLSR6'5"241
34Caden TurnerDLFR6'3"202
44Kenyatta HardgeDLSO6'1"293
49Mekhi LockhartDLFR6'4"296
51Jaxson CunninghamDLSO5'11"225
52Mikailin WarrenDLJR6'4"380
55Cole FunderburkDLFR6'3"244
58Braydin WardDLJR6'6"258
90B.J. CarterDLFR6'2"295
92Cam ChmuraDLSO6'3"298
95Donovan GarrettDLSO6'2"210
98Terry Nwabuisi-EzealaDLFR6'1"324
99Simeon JohnDLJR6'2"281
97Nate BlancDTFR6'2"290
5Javae GilmoreLBSR6'4"221
6Jalen MarshallLBSR6'2"224
10Chason ClarkLBJR6'2"207
25Andrew HamadLBSO5'11"209
27Cannon LewisLBSO6'2"230
30Jaasai SimmonsLBFR6'1"234
31Brysen DaviesLBFR5'11"200
33Andre ParkerLBFR5'11"202
40Ryan AyersLBSR6'1"203
47EahJay McAdamsLBFR6'1"216
1Boogie TrotterCBSR5'10"185
8Eddie Pleasant IIICBJR5'11"185
9Brayden HallCBSR5'10"181
29Jason HaggertyCBJR5'10"173
37Atley CowanCBSO6'2"192
0Caleb Clark-GloverDBJR5'11"187
2Charles McCartherensDBJR5'10"183
4Philipp DavisDBJR6'1"194
11Josh Pierre-LouisDBSR5'11"182
12Louikenzy JulesDBJR5'11"180
18Daniel HarrisDBJR6'4"180
23Sammy EtienneDBFR5'11"185
39Dawson HillDBFR6'2"184
3Terrente HintonSSR6'2"203
15Tristan LesterSFR5'9"190
16Kendell AndersonSJR6'1"208
17Daytione SmithSSR6'0"190
19Zah JacksonSFR5'10"190
20Zeke GunnSFR6'0"205
22Jaycee HoustonSFR6'2"181
28Aumad EdwardsSFR5'10"168
32Pete SchuhSSR5'10"187
41Jorge Diaz NicholasPKFR6'4"228
90Samuel Guiden KrebsPKFR6'0"216
96Ty PowellPKFR6'0"185
91Cooper HeimbachPFR6'0"188
35Riley WinklerLSFR6'4"204
43Chase OrtizLSSO6'1"220

Team Statistics · per game, with national FBS rank

Points / game
14.0
scoring offense
Points allowed
35.5
scoring defense
Differential
-21.5
per game
Offense
Total yards / game
147.0#133
Yards / play
2.7#135
Passing yards / game
103.0#128
Rushing yards / game
44.0#132
First downs / game
11.0#131
3rd down %
9.1%#135
4th down %
0.0%#108
Time of possession
23:47#130
Defense
Yards allowed / game
487.0#127
Yards / play allowed
6.8#122
Pass yards allowed / game
324.0#130
Rush yards allowed / game
163.0#106
3rd down % allowed
50.0%#116
Sacks
1#104
Tackles for loss
4#114
Turnovers & Discipline
Turnover margin
-2#109
Takeaways
0#118
Giveaways
2#68
Penalties / game
4.0#19
Penalty yards / game
45.0#53

Rank is national among all FBS teams (#1 = best), oriented so higher rank = better even for defensive and discipline metrics. Bars show percentile.

Scouting Report · 2026 projection

Marshall is in year 2 under Tony Gibson. The strengths are on both sides of the ball, led by 16th at staying on schedule through the air. The way in is 134th at keeping everything in front of them.

Marshall has played 1 game against an average slate, adjusted for here. That football carries about 0% of what is below; the rest is still the preseason projection.

Projected strengths

  • Offensestaying on schedule through the air
    #16
    projected
  • Offensefirst and second down
    #23
    projected
  • Defensemoving the ball on the ground
    #26
    projected

Projected soft spots

  • Defensehitting chunk plays
    #134
    projected

Each bar is where this team sits in the country. Before the season has produced enough football these are PROJECTIONS — last season regressed to the mean, plus talent, returning production, recruiting and whether the staff is the same one — and the season replaces them as it is played. Head coaches only — there is no free feed for coordinators, so on a program where the head coach does not call the offense this describes the staff he hired. Play-calling identity is a style, not a grade: throwing more than the situations warrant is not better than throwing less than they warrant.

2026 Season Projection

model win prob · 9 to play
7.83.2
projected final record (now 11)
Exp. wins left
6.8
of 9 games
Bowl odds
96%
reach 6 wins
Best odds
93%
vs Coastal Carolina
Toughest
51%
vs James Madison

How the season could finish · 2026 · chance of each final win total · 9 games left

Every remaining game simulated from the model's win probability for it. Tallest bar is the single likeliest finish, not a prediction that it happens.

12345678910
final winstallest bar = 32% chance
Likeliest finish 8-3 (32%)Bowl eligible 96% · marked on the axis at 6

Player Value

EPA contribution by position group + estimated NIL market value (derived from position rates and on-field production — not actual deal figures).

Unit Value — Total EPA
TEToby Payne
+3.2 EPA
WRXayvion Turner-Bradshaw, Adrian Norton +1
+0.4 EPA
QBKhalil Wilkins
-0.9 EPA
RBJoshon Barbie, Judah Price +1
-4.4 EPA

Total EPA produced by each positional group this season. OL value is captured via the rush/pass efficiency of skill players; OL-specific EPA isn't separately reported.

The Five Factors

ranked vs. FBS · bar = better
Efficiency (PPA)
Off-0.085th#131
Def0.642nd#135
Explosiveness
Off1.0414th#119
Def1.549th#125
Field position
Off77.395th#8
Def64.996th#7
Finishing (pts/opp)
Off0.003rd#134
Def5.437th#129
Turnovers
Won 0Lost 2
Margin -2

Opponent-adjusted efficiency

EPA/play vs. schedule
Offense
Defense
Off · pass
0.1723rd#106
Off · rush
-0.471st#137

Pass vs. rush (PPA)

Rushing
Off-0.471st#137
Def-0.0962nd#53
Passing
Off0.1723rd#107
Def1.401st#137

Trenches & disruption

Line yards (off)
0.60#137
2nd-level / open-field
0.08 / 0.00
Power / stuff (off)
100.0% / 41.7%
Havoc — total (def)
9.5%#134
Havoc — front 7 / DB
5.4% / 4.1%

Standard vs. passing downs

Pro
Std downs
Off-0.24
Def0.54
Pass downs
Off0.18
Def1.22

PPA on each down type (off vs. def).

Opponent-adjusted by down

Pro
1st2nd3rd
Offense-0.21#125-0.08#1100.15#119
Defense0.37#1330.64#1321.23#136

Elo Trajectory

@Penn State@UL Monroe
Elo rating 14781389-89 over season

Team Fingerprint · 2026 · 43 opponent-adjusted metrics · percentile vs 138 FBS teams

Plot these →
worst in FBSbest

Efficiency

  • Offense EPA/play-0.175th
  • Defense EPA/play allowed0.429th
  • Offense success rate29%7th
  • Defense success rate allowed51%11th

Downs

  • Offense success — standard downs34%7th
  • Offense success — passing downs20%15th
  • Defense success allowed — standard downs56%8th
  • Defense success allowed — passing downs33%34th

Explosiveness

  • Offense explosiveness0.893rd
  • Defense explosiveness allowed1.336th
  • Offense explosiveness — standard downs0.542nd
  • Offense explosiveness — passing downs1.947th

Trenches

  • Offense line yards1.01st
  • Defense line yards allowed3.127th
  • Offense highlight yards0.007th
  • Defense highlight yards allowed0.1479th
  • Offense power success0.5022nd
  • Defense power success allowed0.8628th
  • Offense stuff rate0.421st
  • Defense stuff rate0.1425th

Third down

  • Third down conversion20%8th
  • Third down distance faced8.311th
  • Third down conversion allowed50%21st
  • Third down distance forced5.916th

Halves

  • Net success rate — first half-0.1319th
  • Net success rate — second half-0.254th

Drives

  • Points per drive0.007th
  • Points per drive allowed4.114th
  • Average starting field position2312th
  • Opponent starting field position3221st
  • Available yards gained18%3rd
  • Available yards allowed68%16th
  • Scoring opportunities per drive58%12th
  • Scoring opportunities allowed100%16th
  • Points per scoring opportunity0.005th
  • Points allowed per opportunity4.119th
  • Three-and-out rate58%3rd
  • Three-and-outs forced18%34th

Roster

  • Returning usage75%90th
  • Returning EPA28595th
  • Team talent composite59530th
  • Recruiting class rank12311th
  • Recruiting class points16211th

Every metric is opponent-adjusted and ranked so that higher is always better — a defensive rate that is good when low is ranked accordingly. Sack and tackle-for-loss composition are deliberately absent: their relationship to team quality is a measured null, so they carry a style rather than a rank, and they appear in the pressure signature instead.

Intelligence Report

Offensive DNA

Pass-dominant offense — below average EPA/play nationally
EPA/play
-0.075#131 · bottom 20%
Pass EPA/play
+0.169#107
Rush EPA/play
-0.465#137
Explosiveness
1.037#119
Pts/opportunity
0.00#134
Success rate
30.6%

Pass efficiency edge: 0.634 EPA/play

🛡

Defensive Identity

Coverage-heavy defense — allowing above-average EPA/play
EPA/play allowed
+0.644#135 · bottom 20%
Havoc rate (total)
9.5%#134
Front-7 havoc
5.4%
DB havoc
4.1%
Big play rate allowed
1.543#125
Success rate allowed
53.8%

Disruption comes evenly from front and secondary.

📊

Season Signature

14.0 PPG offense, 35.5 allowed — -21.5 margin/game
Points per game
14.0
Points allowed/game
35.5
Scoring margin/game
-21.5
Turnover margin
-2won 0 · lost 2
Production returning
99%
Talent rank (247)
#97

1-1 record through 2 games.

Team Shape · percentile vs. FBS · dashed = 50th

OFFENSE5thEXPLOSIVENESS14thFINISHING3thFIELD POS95thDEFENSE2thHAVOC3th50th100th
Offense
5th
Explosiveness
14th
Finishing
3th
Field Pos
95th
Defense
2th
Havoc
3th

Each axis = national percentile rank. 100th = best in FBS, 0th = worst. Defense and Havoc are oriented so higher = better.

CORE efficiency · situation and opponent removed

Points per 100 plays above average, after the game state is regressed out of every snap and the schedule is solved out across the whole league. The version of this team’s efficiency that can be compared to a team it never played.

Overall
-10.2
#110
Offense
-2.1
#85
Defense
+8.1
#128
Full CORE ratings →

What a possession is worth · 12 drives

MeasureOffenseDefense
Points per drive0.004.09
Starting field positionown 22.7own 32.1
Available yards18.3%68.4%
Scoring opportunities58.3%100.0%
Points per opportunity0.004.09
Three-and-out rate58.3%18.2%
Every team’s drive efficiency →

Play-calling identity

Against what the league calls from the same down, distance, field position, score and clock — so this is the staff, not the game script.

Pass rate
65.7%
Expected, given the spots
61.3%
Over expected
+4.4
Fourth down vs peers
-7
Fourth down vs the model
+0
All play-calling tendencies →

National Landscape · 2026 FBS · offense vs. defense EPA/play

Each dot = one FBS team. Marshall is highlighted. Tap or hover a dot for details.

ELITEDEF. FORTRESSOFF. POWERHOUSEREBUILDING-0.100.00+0.10+0.20+0.30-0.050.00+0.10+0.20Offensive EPA/play← worsebetter →Defensive EPA allowed/play← worsebetter →

Similar Programs

Teams with the closest offense + defense efficiency profile to Marshall in 2026

by EPA/play distance
UL MonroeSP+ -33.2
Off EPA/play -0.154Def EPA/play +0.646Elo 1071
Match
96%
Western KentuckySP+ -13.1
Off EPA/play -0.033Def EPA/play +0.835Elo 1327
Match
90%
UABSP+ -16.0
Off EPA/play +0.113Def EPA/play +0.529Elo 1411
Match
89%
Florida AtlanticSP+ -12.2
Off EPA/play +0.154Def EPA/play +0.644Elo 1189
Match
89%
OhioSP+ -16.4
Off EPA/play +0.118Def EPA/play +0.493Elo 1318
Match
88%
Arkansas StateSP+ -15.1
Off EPA/play +0.125Def EPA/play +0.491Elo 1353
Match
88%

Similarity = normalized Euclidean distance on season offensive and defensive EPA/play. Teams within ±0.02 EPA/play on both units score >90%.

Program Trajectory · CORE rating · 20152026 · points per game vs an average FBS team

2015: +4.0, #56 of 1282016: -25.1, #124 of 1282017: +0.9, #61 of 1302018: -1.6, #74 of 1302019: -4.4, #79 of 1302020: +5.8, #42 of 1242021: +5.2, #53 of 1302022: +4.9, #48 of 1312023: -2.4, #76 of 1332024: +3.3, #54 of 1342025: -2.7, #71 of 1362026: -10.2, #110 of 138
20152026
Now -10.2 · #110 of 138Best +5.8 in 2020Worst -25.1 in 2016

Program History

recent seasons
YearOverallConfWin %xWLuck
20260-10-0
0%
0.0-0.0
20255-73-5
42%
7.9-2.9
202410-38-1
77%
8.4+1.6
20236-73-5
46%
6.2-0.2
20229-45-3
69%
10.4-1.4
20217-65-3
54%
7.4-0.4
20207-34-2
70%
7.0+0.0
20198-56-2
62%
6.3+1.7
20189-46-2
69%
8.5+0.5
20178-54-4
62%
8.1-0.1

xW = expected wins from per-game dominance. Luck = actual − expected (positive = won close games).

0.2%of 50,000 simulated 2026 seasons end with them in the field

0-1 so far, projected to finish 7.0-5.1. Wins the Sun Belt in 4.8%.

If they finish with…

16%
1 loss
0.0%
2 losses
0%
3 losses
0%
4 losses

Their chance of making it at each final loss count.

Win out and it is 16%. One bid goes to the best champion outside the four power leagues, so running the table only enters them into that argument.

down 0.8 points since preseasonlost 0-45 to Penn State against an expected margin of 27, so 18.2 against the number.

  • At 1 loss they are 16% where the average Sun Belt team is 20%.
  • The Sun Belt takes 0.14 bids in an average season.
  • One bid goes to the best champion outside the P4. They take it in 0.2% of seasons, having won their league in 100% of those.

Marshall’s own turning points

Points of playoff probability between winning and losing.

  • wk5at James Madison0.9
  • wk9at Old Dominion0.6
  • wk10at Georgia Southern0.5
  • wk11vs App State0.3
  • wk6vs Coastal Carolina0.3
  • wk8vs South Alabama0.3

Who to root for

Games Marshall is not in that move its odds most. Same units, much smaller scale.

  • wk6Kent State over Western Michigan0.2
  • wk4Virginia over Delaware0.2
  • wk7UL Monroe over Louisiana Tech0.2
  • wk11Oregon State over Boise State0.2
  • wk5Charlotte over Memphis0.1
  • wk9USC over Ohio State0.1
The full playoff picture →

Sun Belt

East division · 0-0 in league play, projected 4.5-3.59 of 14 by title odds
4.8%
Wins the Sun Belt
9.5%
Reaches the title game

The Sun Belt keeps divisions (East and West) and sends the winner of each — so Marshall can finish with the league’s second-best record and still stay home. The last berth is level on percentage in 47% of simulated seasons, so a tiebreaker decides it about that often.

  • wk5Marshall at James Madison16.3
  • wk9Marshall at Old Dominion10.3
  • wk10Marshall at Georgia Southern8.0
  • wk11App State at Marshall7.0

Points of title probability riding on each result. The whole Sun Belt race →

If not the playoff, then

77%
Bowl eligible
75%
Placed in a bowl
0.2%
In the playoff
25%
Season over in November

Marshall is 0-1 and needs 6 more wins from 11 games to reach the six that make a team eligible — at most one of which may come against an FCS opponent. In 1.7% of seasons they get there and still go nowhere: there are more eligible teams than seats.

  • Frisco Bowl9.9%
  • New Orleans Bowl9.8%
  • Myrtle Beach Bowl9.1%
  • Boca Raton Bowl9.0%
  • Salute to Veterans Bowl8.8%
  • Cure Bowl8.5%

Every bowl, and how each one picks →

Recruiting Pipelines

since 2010

Of the 170 high-school programs with a pipeline page here, 17 have sent Marshall a player since 2010 — 41 signees between them. Where they signed, not where they were offered, and not a complete list of Marshall's feeder schools: only these 170 have the outcome history to measure.

High schoolSignedDrafted
Miami CentralFL50
ArmwoodFL40
Glades CentralFL40
LibertyNV40
DwyerFL30
St. John's CollegeDC30
West OrangeFL30
Fork Union Military AcademyVA20
All 170 high-school pipelines →
✓/✗ = whether our pregame model picked the winner. Win % & projections from the Gridpex model. Data: CollegeFootballData.