Skip to content
Rasheen Ali

#22Rasheen Ali

RB·Marshall·202320212.6 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Rasheen Ali is a 2-year Featured Back for Marshall. Rasheen's 2023 season ranks in the 28th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 235 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Rasheen Ali's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Rushing
1140 Rush yards15 Rush TD212 Carries5.4 Yards/carry
Receiving
28 Receptions213 Rec yards1 Rec TD7.6 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency28
  • Volume85
  • Explosiveness48
  • Consistency70
  • Receiving49
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)28th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency70th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • Peak game: 0.47 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs UAlbany.

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Breece HallIowa State0.3404.5102.3
Hassan HaskinsMichigan0.3804.8106.4
James FlandersTulsa0.3904.9103.7

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.4700.47Wk 1 vs UAlbany: +0.47 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs East Carolina: +0.26 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs Virginia Tech: +0.04 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Old Dominion: -0.02 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs NC State: +0.01 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Georgia State: +0.17 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs Coastal Carolina: +0.22 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs App State: -0.04 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Georgia Southern: +0.41 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs South Alabama: +0.12 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Arkansas State: +0.11 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsUAlbanyW21-17181377.621200.47
2@East CarolinaW31-13-12.818854.7344500.26
4vsVirginia TechW24-175.8271746.420.04
5vsOld DominionW41-35-10.128792.824170-0.02
6@NC StateL41-487.414634.502900.01
7@Georgia StateL24-41-6.8191035.4247110.17
9@Coastal CarolinaL6-34-1.212524.302400.22
10@App StateL9-313.813796.10270-0.04
11vsGeorgia SouthernW38-33-5.2241656.933900.41
12@South AlabamaL0-285.116553.4044100.12
13vsArkansas StateW35-21-6.314564.002800.11
20vsUTSAL17-355.499210.21

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
29.6%
Passing plays
8.0%
Rushing plays
53.1%
Standard downs
34.7%
Passing downs
19.2%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.17
Passing downs
0.20
Pass / Rush EPA
0.25 / 0.17

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.850−0.122023
EPA per play · 2021 — 2023 · 20 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2021Marshall
4.7
83.2
2023Marshall
2.6
55.4

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.