Skip to content
Northern Illinois

Northern Illinois Huskies

Mountain West·0-2·
Elo
1266#122
SP+
-22.3#130
FPI
-17.7
AP
NR
Next@ Arizona · Wk 3Win prob 2%Model +31.6
Talent #126 (536.6)Recruiting class #8244% production returning

Team Leaders

Latest on Northern Illinois

All news

Kamari Moulton ran for 183 yards and Iowa did not need much else

Matchup · 6d ago

Northern Illinois kept the passing game that ranked 134th

Matchup · Sep 2

Roster · 113 players

FR 55SO 20JR 22SR 16
#PlayerPosClHtWt
2Brady DavidsonQBSO6'5"230
5Taron DickensQBJR5'11"180
10Bryshawn BrownQBFR6'6"200
14Jalen MaconQBSR6'5"230
15Ean HamricQBSR6'1"200
16Asa JohnsonQBFR6'4"210
18Cole LatimerQBFR6'4"200
8Triston WhiteRBFR5'10"214
11Romelo WareRBSO5'9"200
20Jaidaun CranfordRBFR5'9"190
24Elijah PorterRBSO5'11"202
30Da'sean HowardRBFR6'1"220
32Reginald CraigRBFR5'11"210
45Telly Johnson Jr.RBJR5'11"215
0La'Don BryantWRSO6'4"204
1DeAree RogersWRSR5'11"200
3Rickey Taylor Jr.WRSO6'1"180
4Kenji LewisWRSR6'1"200
6Afy IbekweWRFR6'1"200
7Cam ThompsonWRSR6'0"200
9George DimopoulosWRJR6'2"200
12Tavaris ColesWRJR6'3"190
13Kevin Holmes Jr.WRJR6'6"202
19Kelan McInerneyWRSO6'2"170
21Jermaine Green Jr.WRFR6'0"195
80Braylon AgeeWRFR6'4"200
81Justin FaulknerWRFR6'1"170
88Zaire McKinneyWRFR6'4"195
49Devin HabermehlTESO6'1"255
82Caleb HaackTEFR6'9"250
83Jason FowlerTESO6'5"252
84Glen WeberTEJR6'6"260
85Joe SteinTESO6'6"252
86Brady HasquinTEFR6'6"230
87Liam RussoTEFR6'5"250
89Tyler KlanerTEFR6'4"260
50Brendan GrabotOLFR6'3"308
53Luke SkartvedtOLJR6'3"337
55Ty MeadOLSR6'2"296
58Ross LiegelOLSO6'6"278
61Ben GustafsonOLSO6'8"302
63Landon HronOLJR6'3"335
66Lane MahnesmithOLSO6'8"320
67Tyler RindelsOLFR6'4"295
68Samir SenenatOLSO6'4"285
69Logan GrossOLSO6'4"300
70Chevy TraskOLSR6'5"290
71Cian MahoneyOLFR6'5"270
72Mason MarkelOLFR6'5"307
74Erik MurrayOLFR6'5"275
75Braden PetzelOLFR6'9"290
76Tyler ChambersOLFR6'5"300
77Daine HansonOLSR6'7"315
78Jacob WelchOLJR6'6"316
79Kellen GambleOLFR6'5"268
13Mathias Smith-DavisDESO6'1"240
18Jay'shon ThomasDEJR6'4"246
19James BradleyDEJR6'5"250
24Darrius Summers IIIDEFR6'4"245
45Trenton NixonDEFR6'2"245
53Charles Brooks IIIDEFR6'5"242
56Joseph NnamuchiDEJR6'7"258
87Micah CookDEFR6'6"251
90Kole SneedDEJR6'2"255
93Fawzy OmotosoDEFR6'3"251
97JT KingDEFR6'4"240
0Montrel CanionDTFR6'2"295
11Amari WashingtonDTFR6'3"295
50Matthew ScarlettDTJR6'3"285
54Zach MorrisroeDTFR6'2"300
55Jordan BellamyDTFR6'2"314
58Christopher AllenDTSR6'4"302
64Eli ValenciaDTFR6'1"309
72Terry RobinsonDTFR6'3"270
91Jvon HatcherDTFR6'2"259
92Jacob McGheeDTJR6'2"316
94Brendan AlexanderDTFR6'2"270
95Ryan HassettDTFR6'4"275
6Jashawn NelsonLBFR6'2"230
8Cooper MauLBJR6'1"225
15Broderick WindhamLBSR6'2"220
23Deacon KingLBFR6'1"227
25Brady KerperinLBSO6'2"230
27Trey PorterLBSR6'0"211
33Ross OdgenLBFR6'3"215
44Jack MurrayLBFR6'2"236
47Eliot HummerLBFR6'2"230
57Kimar NelsonLBFR6'2"220
3Liam LindoCBSR6'3"200
4James Little IVCBSO5'11"181
5Yassine FalkeCBJR6'3"190
9Dev'ion ReynoldsCBSO6'1"190
20Marshall WashingtonCBJR6'2"180
28Omar Williams Jr.CBFR6'3"185
29Romelo WalkerCBSO6'1"184
35Cristian HarkinsCBFR6'0"185
2Avery JonesDBSR6'0"195
12Aaron WarrenDBSR6'3"208
17Justus DonahooDBFR6'1"195
21Austin TillmanDBFR5'11"190
7Justin HarrisSJR6'4"202
14Malik ArmstrongSSR6'0"192
16Kyon ConyersSJR5'11"195
22Keagan Ruane-MartinoSFR5'11"183
26Tyrese StanleySJR6'2"200
30Andruw EllisSFR6'0"196
31Champ Smith IIISFR6'2"190
33JJ SchlenhardtPKFR5'11"185
39Ryan ShortPKSR6'0"185
35Carter KlementzosPFR5'11"180
36Jake FerencePSO6'0"195
41Troy StumbaughLSFR5'9"195
43Jason EvansLSJR5'10"229

Team Statistics · per game, with national FBS rank

Points / game
12.0
scoring offense
Points allowed
34.0
scoring defense
Differential
-22.0
per game
Offense
Total yards / game
214.0#134
Yards / play
3.5#138
Passing yards / game
154.5#123
Rushing yards / game
59.5#136
First downs / game
13.5#130
3rd down %
31.0%#120
4th down %
50.0%#71
Time of possession
27:27#110
Defense
Yards allowed / game
380.5#104
Yards / play allowed
5.4#88
Pass yards allowed / game
185.5#59
Rush yards allowed / game
195.0#120
3rd down % allowed
53.6%#134
Sacks
3#79
Tackles for loss
9#91
Turnovers & Discipline
Turnover margin
-1#89
Takeaways
3#45
Giveaways
4#105
Penalties / game
8.0#105
Penalty yards / game
73.0#113

Rank is national among all FBS teams (#1 = best), oriented so higher rank = better even for defensive and discipline metrics. Bars show percentile.

Scouting Report · 2026 projection

Northern Illinois is in year 1 under Rob Harley. The strengths are defensive, led by 32nd at keeping everything in front of them. The way in is 138th at staying on schedule through the air, and they are 135th at generating havoc.

Northern Illinois has played 1 game against a soft slate, adjusted for here. That football carries about 0% of what is below; the rest is still the preseason projection.

Projected strengths

  • Defensehitting chunk plays
    #32
    projected

Projected soft spots

  • Offensestaying on schedule through the air
    #138
    projected
  • Defensesacks and tackles for loss
    #135
    projected
  • Offensesurviving second and twelve
    #132
    projected

Each bar is where this team sits in the country. Before the season has produced enough football these are PROJECTIONS — last season regressed to the mean, plus talent, returning production, recruiting and whether the staff is the same one — and the season replaces them as it is played. Head coaches only — there is no free feed for coordinators, so on a program where the head coach does not call the offense this describes the staff he hired. Play-calling identity is a style, not a grade: throwing more than the situations warrant is not better than throwing less than they warrant.

2026 Season Projection

model win prob · 10 to play
2.69.4
projected final record (now 02)
Exp. wins left
2.6
of 10 games
Bowl odds
1%
reach 6 wins
Best odds
69%
vs UTEP
Toughest
2%
vs Arizona

How the season could finish · 2026 · chance of each final win total · 10 games left

Every remaining game simulated from the model's win probability for it. Tallest bar is the single likeliest finish, not a prediction that it happens.

012345678910
final winstallest bar = 30% chance
Likeliest finish 2-10 (30%)Bowl eligible 1% · marked on the axis at 6

Player Value

EPA contribution by position group + estimated NIL market value (derived from position rates and on-field production — not actual deal figures).

Unit Value — Total EPA
WRGeorge Dimopoulos, La'Don Bryant +1
+9.7 EPA
TEJason Fowler, Glen Weber
+0.4 EPA
RBTelly Johnson Jr., Elijah Porter +1
-0.8 EPA
QBTaron Dickens, Jalen Macon
-2.0 EPA

Total EPA produced by each positional group this season. OL value is captured via the rush/pass efficiency of skill players; OL-specific EPA isn't separately reported.

Estimated NIL Market Value
ESTIMATED
EPA +1.90.060/play32 snaps
QBJalen Macon
~$420K
EPA -3.9-0.195/play20 snaps
EPA -1.0-0.034/play29 snaps

Estimated from position-group market rates and on-field EPA contribution. Actual NIL valuations depend on social media following, brand fit, and market negotiations — these figures are directional only.

The Five Factors

ranked vs. FBS · bar = better
Efficiency (PPA)
Off-0.062nd#135
Def0.1442nd#81
Explosiveness
Off0.801st#137
Def1.1961st#54
Field position
Off74.686th#20
Def65.896th#6
Finishing (pts/opp)
Off1.431st#137
Def2.7370th#42
Turnovers
Won 3Lost 4
Margin -1

Opponent-adjusted efficiency

EPA/play vs. schedule
Offense
Defense
Off · pass
0.1315th#118
Off · rush
-0.0810th#124

Pass vs. rush (PPA)

Rushing
Off-0.0810th#124
Def0.1919th#112
Passing
Off0.1313th#120
Def0.1953rd#66

Trenches & disruption

Line yards (off)
2.54#118
2nd-level / open-field
0.74 / 0.42
Power / stuff (off)
55.6% / 25.6%
Havoc — total (def)
11.9%#124
Havoc — front 7 / DB
6.3% / 5.6%

Standard vs. passing downs

Pro
Std downs
Off-0.02
Def0.00
Pass downs
Off-0.15
Def0.43

PPA on each down type (off vs. def).

Opponent-adjusted by down

Pro
1st2nd3rd
Offense-0.14#126-0.17#1290.30#108
Defense-0.07#600.03#480.85#125

Elo Trajectory

@IowaFinal
Elo rating 13221245-77 over season

Team Fingerprint · 2026 · 43 opponent-adjusted metrics · percentile vs 138 FBS teams

Plot these →
worst in FBSbest

Efficiency

  • Offense EPA/play-0.331st
  • Defense EPA/play allowed0.0650th
  • Offense success rate17%1st
  • Defense success rate allowed42%34th

Downs

  • Offense success — standard downs18%1st
  • Offense success — passing downs16%7th
  • Defense success allowed — standard downs49%26th
  • Defense success allowed — passing downs27%51st

Explosiveness

  • Offense explosiveness1.477th
  • Defense explosiveness allowed1.247th
  • Offense explosiveness — standard downs0.603rd
  • Offense explosiveness — passing downs2.589th

Trenches

  • Offense line yards1.74th
  • Defense line yards allowed3.316th
  • Offense highlight yards0.007th
  • Defense highlight yards allowed3.24th
  • Offense power success1.099th
  • Defense power success allowed0.2985th
  • Offense stuff rate0.289th
  • Defense stuff rate0.2155th

Third down

  • Third down conversion21%11th
  • Third down distance faced7.234th
  • Third down conversion allowed43%34th
  • Third down distance forced6.631st

Halves

  • Net success rate — first half-0.381st
  • Net success rate — second half-0.0628th

Drives

  • Points per drive-0.501st
  • Points per drive allowed2.634th
  • Average starting field position2210th
  • Opponent starting field position408th
  • Available yards gained12%1st
  • Available yards allowed61%25th
  • Scoring opportunities per drive50%7th
  • Scoring opportunities allowed100%16th
  • Points per scoring opportunity0.005th
  • Points allowed per opportunity2.653rd
  • Three-and-out rate71%1st
  • Three-and-outs forced23%48th

Roster

  • Returning usage47%55th
  • Returning EPA35.820th
  • Team talent composite5379th
  • Recruiting class rank82.041st
  • Recruiting class points18541st

Every metric is opponent-adjusted and ranked so that higher is always better — a defensive rate that is good when low is ranked accordingly. Sack and tackle-for-loss composition are deliberately absent: their relationship to team quality is a measured null, so they carry a style rather than a rank, and they appear in the pressure signature instead.

Intelligence Report

Offensive DNA

Pass-dominant offense — below average EPA/play nationally
EPA/play
-0.056#135 · bottom 20%
Pass EPA/play
+0.125#120
Rush EPA/play
-0.083#124
Explosiveness
0.801#137
Pts/opportunity
1.43#137
Success rate
36.4%

Pass efficiency edge: 0.208 EPA/play

🛡

Defensive Identity

EPA/play allowed
+0.137#81 · average
Havoc rate (total)
11.9%#124
Front-7 havoc
6.3%
DB havoc
5.6%
Big play rate allowed
1.191#54
Success rate allowed
43.5%

Disruption comes evenly from front and secondary.

📊

Season Signature

12.0 PPG offense, 34.0 allowed — -22.0 margin/game
Points per game
12.0
Points allowed/game
34.0
Scoring margin/game
-22.0
Turnover margin
-1won 3 · lost 4
Production returning
44%
Talent rank (247)
#126

0-2 record through 2 games.

Team Shape · percentile vs. FBS · dashed = 50th

OFFENSE2thEXPLOSIVENESS1thFINISHING1thFIELD POS86thDEFENSE42thHAVOC10th50th100th
Offense
2th
Explosiveness
1th
Finishing
1th
Field Pos
86th
Defense
42th
Havoc
10th

Each axis = national percentile rank. 100th = best in FBS, 0th = worst. Defense and Havoc are oriented so higher = better.

CORE efficiency · situation and opponent removed

Points per 100 plays above average, after the game state is regressed out of every snap and the schedule is solved out across the whole league. The version of this team’s efficiency that can be compared to a team it never played.

Overall
-23.1
#136
Offense
-14.9
#137
Defense
+8.1
#129
Full CORE ratings →

What a possession is worth · 14 drives

MeasureOffenseDefense
Points per drive-0.502.62
Starting field positionown 22.3own 39.8
Available yards12.5%60.8%
Scoring opportunities50.0%100.0%
Points per opportunity0.002.62
Three-and-out rate71.4%23.1%
Every team’s drive efficiency →

National Landscape · 2026 FBS · offense vs. defense EPA/play

Each dot = one FBS team. Northern Illinois is highlighted. Tap or hover a dot for details.

ELITEDEF. FORTRESSOFF. POWERHOUSEREBUILDING-0.100.00+0.10+0.20+0.30-0.050.00+0.10+0.20Offensive EPA/play← worsebetter →Defensive EPA allowed/play← worsebetter →

Similar Programs

Teams with the closest offense + defense efficiency profile to Northern Illinois in 2026

by EPA/play distance
Central MichiganSP+ -20.0
Off EPA/play -0.047Def EPA/play +0.131Elo 1259
Match
99%
Washington StateSP+ -3.7
Off EPA/play -0.060Def EPA/play +0.147Elo 1601
Match
99%
LibertySP+ -7.2
Off EPA/play -0.027Def EPA/play +0.096Elo 1697
Match
97%
Oklahoma StateSP+ +1.1
Off EPA/play -0.018Def EPA/play +0.169Elo 1212
Match
97%
Eastern MichiganSP+ -15.6
Off EPA/play +0.041Def EPA/play +0.117Elo 1353
Match
94%
UNLVSP+ +2.3
Off EPA/play +0.041Def EPA/play +0.186Elo 1589
Match
93%

Similarity = normalized Euclidean distance on season offensive and defensive EPA/play. Teams within ±0.02 EPA/play on both units score >90%.

Program Trajectory · CORE rating · 20152026 · points per game vs an average FBS team

2015: -1.6, #73 of 1282016: -4.3, #84 of 1282017: +0.4, #62 of 1302018: -4.1, #90 of 1302019: -15.1, #110 of 1302020: -10.5, #96 of 1242021: -14.2, #104 of 1302022: -18.0, #119 of 1312023: -4.3, #84 of 1332024: +4.6, #50 of 1342025: -22.4, #129 of 1362026: -23.1, #136 of 138
20152026
Now -23.1 · #136 of 138Best +4.6 in 2024Worst -23.1 in 2026

Program History

recent seasons
YearOverallConfWin %xWLuck
20260-20-0
0%
0.9-0.9
20253-92-6
25%
4.6-1.6
20248-54-4
62%
10.1-2.1
20237-65-3
54%
7.9-0.9
20223-92-6
25%
5.7-2.7
20219-57-2
64%
8.7+0.3
20200-60-6
0%
0.7-0.7
20195-74-4
42%
5.5-0.5
20188-67-2
57%
6.5+1.5
20178-56-2
62%
8.0+0.0

xW = expected wins from per-game dominance. Luck = actual − expected (positive = won close games).

0.0%of 50,000 simulated 2026 seasons end with them in the field

0-1 so far, projected to finish 4.5-7.5. Wins the Mountain West in 0.5%.

If they finish with…

0%
3 losses
0%
4 losses

Their chance of making it at each final loss count.

down 0.0 points since preseasonlost 0-40 to Iowa against an expected margin of 34, so 5.8 against the number.

  • The Mountain West takes 0.23 bids in an average season.
  • One bid goes to the best champion outside the P4. They take it in 0.0% of seasons, having won their league in 67% of those.

Northern Illinois’s own turning points

Points of playoff probability between winning and losing.

  • wk9at UNLV0.1
  • wk11vs Nevada0.0
  • wk10at San José State0.0
  • wk8vs Hawai'i0.0
  • wk7at Wyoming0.0
  • wk6vs Air Force0.0

Who to root for

Games Northern Illinois is not in that move its odds most. Same units, much smaller scale.

  • wk13Charlotte over Navy0.0
  • wk11Northwestern over Ohio State0.0
  • wk2Bowling Green over Nebraska0.0
  • wk12Nebraska over Ohio State0.0
  • wk10Sacramento State over Toledo0.0
  • wk9Stanford over Louisville0.0
The full playoff picture →

Mountain West

0-0 in league play, projected 2.8-5.28 of 10 by title odds
0.5%
Wins the Mountain West
2.4%
Reaches the title game

The Mountain West sends its top two by conference winning percentage, head-to-head breaking a tie. The last berth is level on percentage in 35% of simulated seasons, so a tiebreaker decides it about that often.

  • wk9Northern Illinois at UNLV3.7
  • wk3Northern Illinois at Arizona1.9
  • wk6Air Force at Northern Illinois1.6
  • wk11Nevada at Northern Illinois1.6

Points of title probability riding on each result. The whole Mountain West race →

If not the playoff, then

29%
Bowl eligible
26%
Placed in a bowl
0.0%
In the playoff
74%
Season over in November

Northern Illinois is 0-1 and needs 6 more wins from 11 games to reach the six that make a team eligible — at most one of which may come against an FCS opponent. In 3.0% of seasons they get there and still go nowhere: there are more eligible teams than seats.

  • Famous Idaho Potato Bowl7.7%
  • Hawai'i Bowl6.3%
  • Arizona Bowl6.1%
  • New Mexico Bowl2.1%
  • Cure Bowl1.3%
  • LA Bowl0.8%

Every bowl, and how each one picks →

Recruiting Pipelines

since 2010

Of the 170 high-school programs with a pipeline page here, 3 have sent Northern Illinois a player since 2010 — 9 signees between them. Where they signed, not where they were offered, and not a complete list of Northern Illinois's feeder schools: only these 170 have the outcome history to measure.

High schoolSignedDrafted
Cass TechnicalMI40
Miami ColumbusFL30
Wheaton Warrenville SouthIL20
All 170 high-school pipelines →
✓/✗ = whether our pregame model picked the winner. Win % & projections from the Gridpex model. Data: CollegeFootballData.