Skip to content
Shai Werts

#5Shai Werts

WR·Georgia Southern·20202019201820171.0 pts line value1st Round

Shai Werts is a 4-year Slot Specialist WR for Georgia Southern. Shai's 2020 season ranks in the 50th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 266 plays — a average rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Shai Werts's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2020 Production

Passing
79/131 Comp/Att1063 Pass yards8 Pass TD6 INT60.3% Comp %
Rushing
709 Rush yards11 Rush TD146 Carries4.9 Yards/carry
Punting
1 Punts37 Punt yards37.0 Yards/punt37 Long0 Inside 20

Performance Analysis · 2020 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency50
  • Volume100
  • Explosiveness36
  • Consistency79
  • Pass-Down1
Player type
Slot Specialist WR

The offense's primary passing-down weapon — routes, separation, and reliability on 3rd down define this role.

3rd-down converterRoute technicianHigh passing-down share
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)50th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency79th %ile · above avg
Career trajectory:→ Stable
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used WRs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • Peak game: 0.48 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Campbell.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Zach AbeyNavy0.3702.9101.8
D.J. FosterArizona State0.2001.034.8
Zach AbeyNavy0.3702.146.6
Jerrod HeardTexas0.2901.633.6
Shane TuckerMiddle Tennessee0.3201.631.0

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · EPA per play, week by week

+0.4800.48Wk 2 vs Campbell: +0.48 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs Louisiana: +0.25 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs UL Monroe: +0.38 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Massachusetts: +0.36 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Coastal Carolina: -0.04 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs South Alabama: +0.23 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Troy: -0.12 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Texas State: +0.14 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Army: +0.40 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Georgia State: +0.33 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs Louisiana Tech: +0.43 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+EPA/playPassRush
2vsCampbellW27-260.480.320.62
4@LouisianaL18-208.10.250.69-0.42
5@UL MonroeW35-30-18.40.38-0.321.31
7vsMassachusettsW41-0-31.30.360.650.01
8@Coastal CarolinaL14-286.6-0.04-0.260.42
9vsSouth AlabamaW24-17-11.30.230.310.18
10vsTroyW20-132.3-0.12-0.350.13
11vsTexas StateW40-38-13.40.14-0.150.31
12@ArmyL27-282.70.401.01-0.08
13@Georgia StateL24-30-5.70.330.620.15
1vsLouisiana TechW38-3-7.00.430.170.70

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
40.6%
Passing plays
90.4%
Rushing plays
25.8%
Standard downs
34.0%
Passing downs
60.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.35
Passing downs
0.06
Pass / Rush EPA
0.21 / 0.28

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.270−0.64201820192020
EPA per play · 2017 — 2020 · 45 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2017Georgia Southern
0.0
24.2
2018Georgia Southern
2.3
51.8
2019Georgia Southern
1.9
32.1
2020Georgia Southern
1.0
39.7

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.