Skip to content
Ryan Finley

#15Ryan Finley

QB·NC State·2018201720169.2 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Ryan Finley is a 3-year Dual-Threat QB for NC State. Ryan's 2017 season ranks in the 53th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 544 plays — a average rate for the QB. Ryan's production has improved each season, a positive development trajectory.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Ryan Finley's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2017 Production

Passing
311/478 Comp/Att3514 Pass yards17 Pass TD6 INT65.1% Comp %
Rushing
194 Rush yards3 Rush TD69 Carries2.8 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2017 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency53
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency86
  • Clutch91
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)53th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency86th %ile · above avg
Career trajectory:↑ Rising
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • Career trajectory is upward — WEPA value has improved season over season.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.21 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.65 EPA/play in Wk 6 vs Louisville (SP+ 19).

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Kyle McCordSyracuse0.50912.1321.4
Jordan TravisFlorida State0.47610.1328.3
Sam HartmanWake Forest0.55611.8359.6
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0
Trace McSorleyPenn State0.51312.7321.0

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.6500.65Wk 1 vs South Carolina: +0.31 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Marshall: +0.55 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Furman: +0.46 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Florida State: +0.49 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Syracuse: +0.35 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Louisville: +0.65 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Pittsburgh: +0.33 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs Notre Dame: +0.02 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Clemson: +0.33 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Boston College: +0.04 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Wake Forest: +0.29 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs North Carolina: +0.37 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs Arizona State: +0.53 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsSouth CarolinaL28-357.845/644152076.2-2210.31
2vsMarshallW37-20-4.529/363413091.84200.55
3vsFurmanW49-1622/272311091.4-600.46
4@Florida StateW27-2122.822/322302081.00.49
5vsSyracuseW33-254.020/331861074.43700.35
6vsLouisvilleW39-2519.220/313671082.21900.65
7@PittsburghW35-176.014/251981053.71000.33
9@Notre DameL14-3520.817/372131126.1-2100.02
10vsClemsonL31-3826.431/503383264.93500.33
11@Boston CollegeW17-144.613/321460139.43900.04
12@Wake ForestL24-3010.534/523271182.73500.29
13vsNorth CarolinaW33-214.320/302040152.42720.37
1vsArizona StateW52-311.024/293181091.0-100.53

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
55.2%
Passing plays
98.8%
Rushing plays
11.8%
Standard downs
46.7%
Passing downs
73.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.24
Passing downs
0.50
Pass / Rush EPA
0.34 / 0.46

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.890−0.6420172018
EPA per play · 2016 — 2018 · 38 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2016NC State
6.0
189.4
2017NC State
9.2
253.8
2018NC State
8.4
233.5

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.