Skip to content
Rakeem Cato

#12Rakeem Cato

QB·Marshall·2014201310.4 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Rakeem Cato is a 2-year Dual-Threat QB for Marshall. Rakeem's 2014 season ranks in the 63th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 462 plays — a average rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Rakeem Cato's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2014 Production

Passing
267/451 Comp/Att3903 Pass yards40 Pass TD13 INT59.2% Comp %
Rushing
482 Rush yards8 Rush TD94 Carries5.1 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2014 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency63
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat87
  • Consistency87
  • Clutch100
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)63th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency87th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 9 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.86 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs Ohio (SP+ -12).

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0
Tanner MordecaiSMU0.63014.0321.5
Ryan HigginsLouisiana Tech0.58613.7334.6
Kyle McCordSyracuse0.50912.1321.4
Baker MayfieldOklahoma0.56114.1323.7

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.8600.86Wk 1 vs Miami (OH): +0.24 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Rhode Island: +0.43 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Ohio: +0.86 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Akron: +0.42 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Old Dominion: +0.13 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Middle Tennessee: +0.54 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Florida International: +0.58 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Florida Atlantic: +0.51 EPA/play9Wk 12 vs Rice: +0.51 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs UAB: +0.38 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Western Kentucky: +0.46 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs Louisiana Tech: +0.08 EPA/play15Wk 1 vs Northern Illinois: +0.46 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1@Miami (OH)W42-27-18.720/322613067.4-1010.24
2vsRhode IslandW48-715/292672078.214310.43
3vsOhioW44-14-11.717/294254195.11900.86
4@AkronW48-17-9.417/312101177.52320.42
6@Old DominionW56-14-12.718/231982281.72000.13
7vsMiddle TennesseeW49-24-8.717/333373179.1510.54
8@Florida InternationalW45-13-16.215/272144178.92300.58
9vsFlorida AtlanticW35-16-10.413/242181075.83200.51
11@Southern MissW63-17-15.913/191862097.2921
12vsRiceW41-14-3.123/372974177.41200.51
13@UABW23-18-4.220/382842174.24100.38
14vsWestern KentuckyL66-67-2.629/464177470.52900.46
15vsLouisiana TechW26-23-1.725/463082145.22800.08
1vsNorthern IllinoisW52-23-0.625/372813086.72520.46

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
52.2%
Passing plays
95.3%
Rushing plays
13.8%
Standard downs
47.9%
Passing downs
62.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.27
Passing downs
0.63
Pass / Rush EPA
0.41 / 0.34

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.94+0.002014
EPA per play · 2013 — 2014 · 27 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2013Marshall
3.6
129.4
2014Marshall
10.4
271.3

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.