Skip to content
Baker Mayfield

#6Baker Mayfield

QB·Oklahoma·20172016201514.1 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Baker Mayfield is a 3-year Dual-Threat QB for Oklahoma. Baker's 2015 season ranks in the 78th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 513 plays — a above-average rate for the QB. Baker's production has improved each season, a positive development trajectory.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Baker Mayfield's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2015 Production

Passing
269/395 Comp/Att3700 Pass yards36 Pass TD7 INT68.1% Comp %
Rushing
405 Rush yards7 Rush TD141 Carries2.9 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2015 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency78
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat78
  • Consistency80
  • Clutch48
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)78th %ile · above avg
Game-to-game consistency80th %ile · above avg
Career trajectory:↑ Rising
Key findings
  • Above-average efficiency for the QB position (78th percentile).
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • Career trajectory is upward — WEPA value has improved season over season.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 7 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Peak game: 0.82 EPA/play in Wk 9 vs Kansas (SP+ -21).

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Tanner MordecaiSMU0.63014.0321.5
Ryan HigginsLouisiana Tech0.58613.7334.6
J.T. BarrettOhio State0.59314.1341.6
Malik CunninghamLouisville0.68114.7341.6
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.8200.82Wk 1 vs Akron: +0.57 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Tennessee: +0.10 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Tulsa: +0.82 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs West Virginia: +0.32 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Texas: +0.12 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Kansas State: +0.68 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Texas Tech: +0.27 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Kansas: +0.82 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Iowa State: +0.51 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Baylor: +0.50 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs TCU: +0.04 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Oklahoma State: +0.56 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs Clemson: +0.06 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsAkronW41-3-0.823/333883065.4810.57
2@TennesseeW31-2419.519/391873236.44610.10
3vsTulsaW52-38-8.532/384874096.38520.82
5vsWest VirginiaW44-2412.914/253203158.6-100.32
6vsTexasL17-243.720/282111032.1-500.12
7@Kansas StateW55-02.620/272825091.93300.68
8vsTexas TechW63-274.515/222122161.71600.27
9@KansasW62-7-21.327/323834096.61600.82
10vsIowa StateW52-16-0.323/313423081.22710.51
11@BaylorW44-3419.524/342703185.77610.50
12vsTCUW30-2919.09/201272059.14200.04
13@Oklahoma StateW58-239.917/251802086.47710.56
1vsClemsonL17-3724.026/413111252.7-1500.06

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
51.8%
Passing plays
90.3%
Rushing plays
19.6%
Standard downs
47.5%
Passing downs
62.3%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.39
Passing downs
0.43
Pass / Rush EPA
0.43 / 0.29

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.280−0.0820162017
EPA per play · 2015 — 2017 · 40 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2015Oklahoma
14.1
323.7
2016Oklahoma
22.5
413.2
2017Oklahoma
21.5
437.3

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.