Skip to content
Kyler Murray

#1Kyler Murray

QB·Oklahoma·201824.5 pts line value1st Round

Kyler Murray is a Dual-Threat QB for Oklahoma. Kyler's 2018 season ranks in the 98th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 498 plays — a elite rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Kyler Murray's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2018 Production

Passing
259/376 Comp/Att4364 Pass yards42 Pass TD7 INT68.9% Comp %
Rushing
1001 Rush yards12 Rush TD140 Carries7.2 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2018 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency98
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency90
  • Clutch100
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)98th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency90th %ile · elite
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among QBs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 14 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.20 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.32 EPA/play in Wk 5 vs Baylor (SP+ 2).

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Baker MayfieldOklahoma0.85422.5413.2
C.J. StroudOhio State0.89022.4438.8
Baker MayfieldOklahoma0.79821.5437.3
Joe BurrowLSU0.82624.7553.3
Mac JonesAlabama0.83019.2379.3

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.3201.32Wk 1 vs Florida Atlantic: +1.17 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs UCLA: +0.65 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Iowa State: +0.57 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Army: +0.90 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Baylor: +1.32 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Texas: +0.80 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs TCU: +0.66 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Kansas State: +1.07 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Texas Tech: +0.69 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Oklahoma State: +0.53 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Kansas: +0.60 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs West Virginia: +0.83 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Texas: +0.54 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Alabama: +0.42 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsFlorida AtlanticW63-14-0.89/11209202301.17
2vsUCLAW49-21-0.419/33306316920.65
3@Iowa StateW37-277.921/29348307700.57
4vsArmyW28-21-1.511/15165317110.90
5vsBaylorW66-332.017/21432604511.32
6vsTexasL45-4811.318/25307419210.80
8@TCUW52-276.919/24213405100.66
9vsKansas StateW51-14-0.519/24352304611.07
10@Texas TechW51-468.720/353603210010.69
11vsOklahoma StateW48-4713.821/29349106600.53
12vsKansasW55-40-10.021/32272219930.60
13@West VirginiaW59-5613.220/273643111410.83
14vsTexasW39-2711.325/34379303900.54
1vsAlabamaL34-4536.319/373082010910.42

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
54.8%
Passing plays
94.0%
Rushing plays
24.6%
Standard downs
49.6%
Passing downs
69.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.59
Passing downs
0.90
Pass / Rush EPA
0.71 / 0.66

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.41+0.33
EPA per play · 2018 · 14 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.