Skip to content
Joe Burrow

#9Joe Burrow

QB·LSU·2019201824.7 pts line value1st Round

Joe Burrow is a 2-year Dual-Threat QB for LSU. Joe's 2019 season ranks in the 95th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 600 plays — a elite rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Joe Burrow's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2019 Production

Passing
402/527 Comp/Att5671 Pass yards60 Pass TD6 INT76.3% Comp %
Rushing
369 Rush yards5 Rush TD115 Carries3.2 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2019 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency95
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency91
  • Clutch100
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)95th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency91th %ile · elite
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among QBs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 14 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.21 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.95 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs Northwestern State.

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Kyler MurrayOklahoma0.87524.5492.9
Baker MayfieldOklahoma0.79821.5437.3
C.J. StroudOhio State0.89022.4438.8
Baker MayfieldOklahoma0.85422.5413.2
Marcus MariotaOregon0.71319.2434.8

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.9500.95Wk 1 vs Georgia Southern: +0.86 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Texas: +0.67 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Northwestern State: +0.95 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Vanderbilt: +0.77 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Utah State: +0.56 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Florida: +0.90 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Mississippi State: +0.57 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Auburn: +0.17 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Alabama: +0.47 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Ole Miss: +0.59 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Arkansas: +0.56 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Texas A&M: +0.66 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs Georgia: +0.53 EPA/play15Wk 1 vs Clemson: +0.50 EPA/play1Wk 1 vs Oklahoma: +0.50 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsGeorgia SouthernW55-3-4.523/272785097.2200.86
2@TexasW45-3812.031/394714188.6800.67
3vsNorthwestern StateW65-1421/243732197.33010.95
4@VanderbiltW66-38-10.425/343986096.4-2000.77
6vsUtah StateW42-6-4.327/383445175.44210.56
7vsFloridaW42-2824.021/242933096.24300.90
8@Mississippi StateW36-133.525/323274087.5-1100.57
9vsAuburnW23-2021.032/423211160.93110.17
11@AlabamaW46-4132.431/39393306400.47
12@Ole MissW58-372.932/42489522600.59
13vsArkansasW56-20-10.623/28327302400.56
14vsTexas A&MW50-715.023/3235230900.66
15vsGeorgiaW37-1026.828/38349404100.53
1vsClemsonW42-2528.131/49463505810.50
1vsOklahomaW63-2822.929/39493702210.50

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
58.2%
Passing plays
93.1%
Rushing plays
17.5%
Standard downs
54.6%
Passing downs
68.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.54
Passing downs
0.88
Pass / Rush EPA
0.68 / 0.44

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.170−0.222019
EPA per play · 2018 — 2019 · 28 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2018LSU
6.4
216.4
2019LSU
24.7
553.3

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.