Skip to content
Joe Burrow

#9Joe Burrow

QB·LSU·201920186.4 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Joe Burrow is a 2-year Dual-Threat QB for LSU. Joe's 2018 season ranks in the 18th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 492 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Joe Burrow's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2018 Production

Passing
219/379 Comp/Att2893 Pass yards16 Pass TD5 INT57.8% Comp %
Rushing
399 Rush yards7 Rush TD128 Carries3.1 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2018 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency18
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat95
  • Consistency75
  • Clutch32
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)18th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency75th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Peak game: 0.65 EPA/play in Wk 5 vs Ole Miss (SP+ 10).

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.6500.65Wk 1 vs Miami: +0.11 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs SE Louisiana: +0.35 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Auburn: +0.12 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Louisiana Tech: +0.17 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Ole Miss: +0.65 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Florida: +0.17 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Georgia: +0.29 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Mississippi State: -0.07 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Alabama: -0.10 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Arkansas: +0.45 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Rice: +0.57 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Texas A&M: +0.31 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs UCF: +0.60 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsMiamiW33-1712.711/24140001400.11
2vsSE LouisianaW31-010/20151202010.35
3@AuburnW22-2123.615/34249102200.12
4vsLouisiana TechW38-21-6.916/2819100200.17
5vsOle MissW45-169.818/25292309610.65
6@FloridaL19-2723.019/34191022200.17
7vsGeorgiaW36-1632.915/30200006620.29
8vsMississippi StateW19-323.216/281290180-0.07
10vsAlabamaL0-2936.318/3518401-70-0.10
11@ArkansasW24-174.515/21195101500.45
12vsRiceW42-10-26.420/28307201700.57
13@Texas A&ML72-7421.625/382703010030.31
1vsUCFW40-3216.521/34394412400.60

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
52.0%
Passing plays
97.9%
Rushing plays
18.1%
Standard downs
42.5%
Passing downs
70.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.29
Passing downs
0.26
Pass / Rush EPA
0.26 / 0.38

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.170−0.222019
EPA per play · 2018 — 2019 · 28 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2018LSU
6.4
216.4
2019LSU
24.7
553.3

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.