Skip to content
C.J. Stroud

#7C.J. Stroud

QB·Ohio State·2022202122.4 pts line value1st Round

C.J. Stroud is a 2-year Clutch Passer for Ohio State. C.J.'s 2021 season ranks in the 98th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 441 plays — a elite rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So C.J. Stroud's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2021 Production

Passing
317/441 Comp/Att4435 Pass yards44 Pass TD6 INT71.9% Comp %
Rushing
-20 Rush yards0 Rush TD32 Carries-0.6 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2021 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency98
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat0
  • Consistency86
  • Clutch100
Player type
Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)98th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency86th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among QBs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 8 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.15 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.27 EPA/play in Wk 5 vs Rutgers (SP+ -3).

NIL Market Tier· 2021

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Baker MayfieldOklahoma0.85422.5413.2
Baker MayfieldOklahoma0.79821.5437.3
Mac JonesAlabama0.83019.2379.3
Kyler MurrayOklahoma0.87524.5492.9
Jayden DanielsLSU0.78317.5360.8

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.2701.27Wk 1 vs Minnesota: +0.61 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Oregon: +0.39 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Tulsa: +0.27 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs Rutgers: +1.27 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Maryland: +0.97 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Indiana: +0.77 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Penn State: +0.40 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Nebraska: +0.17 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Purdue: +0.76 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Michigan State: +0.77 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Michigan: +0.49 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs Utah: +0.81 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1@MinnesotaW45-3114.413/222944192.01300.61
2vsOregonL28-3510.235/544843181.4-300.39
3vsTulsaW41-205.815/251851159.8-1400.27
5@RutgersW52-13-3.017/233305098.91301.27
6vsMarylandW66-176.224/334065098.5800.97
8@IndianaW54-7-7.821/282664097.4100.77
9vsPenn StateW33-2414.322/343051089.00.40
10@NebraskaW26-1710.336/544052269.6-1300.17
11vsPurdueW59-3110.331/383615097.2-100.76
12vsMichigan StateW56-711.232/354326098.6-400.77
13@MichiganL27-4223.434/493942082.8-3000.49
1vsUtahW48-4515.237/465736198.31000.81

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
55.3%
Passing plays
94.0%
Rushing plays
5.9%
Standard downs
51.7%
Passing downs
65.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.45
Passing downs
0.93
Pass / Rush EPA
0.64 / -0.26

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.400−0.142022
EPA per play · 2021 — 2022 · 25 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2021Ohio State
22.4
438.8
2022Ohio State
17.6
355.2

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.