Skip to content
Carson Hansen

#21Carson Hansen

RB·Iowa State·202520242.3 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Carson Hansen is a 2-year Explosive Back for Iowa State. Carson's 2024 season ranks in the 53th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 161 plays — a average rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Carson Hansen's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Rushing
752 Rush yards13 Rush TD151 Carries5.0 Yards/carry
Receiving
13 Receptions88 Rec yards2 Rec TD6.8 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency53
  • Volume48
  • Explosiveness40
  • Consistency31
  • Receiving31
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)53th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency31th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.20 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.86 EPA/play in Wk 8 vs UCF (SP+ 3).

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Travis EtienneClemson0.4704.7100.1
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Clyde Edwards-HelaireLSU0.4905.0105.8
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.4105.298.4
James FlandersTulsa0.3904.9103.7

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.8600.86Wk 1 vs North Dakota: +0.11 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Iowa: -0.68 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs Arkansas State: +0.83 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Houston: +0.22 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Baylor: +0.16 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs West Virginia: +0.46 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs UCF: +0.86 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Texas Tech: +0.00 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Kansas: +0.30 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Cincinnati: -0.56 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Utah: +0.43 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Kansas State: -0.02 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs Arizona State: +0.30 EPA/play15
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsNorth DakotaW21-36203.300.11
2@IowaW20-1915.8221.00250-0.68
4vsArkansas StateW52-7-9.99586.420.83
5@HoustonW20-0-8.29343.8021700.22
6vsBaylorW43-218.415976.500.16
7@West VirginiaW28-162.120964.830.46
8vsUCFW38-352.899110.120.86
10vsTexas TechL22-234.311464.201800.00
11vsKansasL36-454.98486.0111600.30
12vsCincinnatiW34-17-0.19111.21-0.56
13@UtahW31-287.714574.1222800.43
14vsKansas StateW29-2114.113584.50-0.02
15vsArizona StateL19-459.410525.204110.30
20vsMiamiW42-4121.616825.121131

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
16.8%
Passing plays
2.9%
Rushing plays
30.4%
Standard downs
22.2%
Passing downs
4.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.22
Passing downs
0.36
Pass / Rush EPA
0.70 / 0.19

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.010−0.832025
EPA per play · 2024 — 2025 · 25 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2024Iowa State
2.3
53.5
2025Iowa State
1.5
28.5

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.