Skip to content
Ty Johnson

#24Ty Johnson

RB·Maryland·20162.9 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Ty Johnson is a Explosive Back for Maryland. Ty's 2016 season ranks in the 93th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 113 plays — a elite rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Ty Johnson's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2016 Production

Rushing
1004 Rush yards6 Rush TD110 Carries9.1 Yards/carry
Receiving
16 Receptions206 Rec yards1 Rec TD12.9 Yards/rec
Returns
2 Kick returns31 KR yards0 KR TD1 Punt returns8 PR yards0 PR TD

Performance Analysis · 2016 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency93
  • Volume42
  • Explosiveness100
  • Consistency50
  • Receiving61
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)93th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency50th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among RBs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • 7 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.29 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 2.43 EPA/play in Wk 5 vs Purdue (SP+ -11).

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Travis EtienneClemson0.4704.7100.1
Clyde Edwards-HelaireLSU0.4905.0105.8
Devon JohnsonMarshall0.5206.0108.2
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.4105.298.4
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.4505.8102.6

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+2.4302.43Wk 1 vs Howard: +0.50 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Florida International: -0.00 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs UCF: -0.02 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs Purdue: +2.43 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Penn State: +0.58 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Minnesota: -0.22 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Michigan State: +1.01 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Indiana: +1.03 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Michigan: -0.16 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Ohio State: -0.24 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Nebraska: -0.38 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Rutgers: +0.70 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs Boston College: +0.57 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsHowardW52-136488.0132300.50
2@Florida InternationalW41-14-19.08344.302210-0.00
3@UCFW30-24-2.27476.70-0.02
5vsPurdueW50-7-11.0720429.122.43
6@Penn StateL14-3819.05112.2026910.58
7vsMinnesotaL10-3112.65234.60-0.22
8vsMichigan StateW28-177.4911512.8011601.01
9@IndianaL36-424.61314210.911601.03
10@MichiganL3-5924.49111.202420-0.16
11vsOhio StateL3-6222.48212.60230-0.24
12@NebraskaL7-2810.37213.00-0.38
13vsRutgersW31-13-14.91116815.3011100.70
1vsBoston CollegeL30-36-1.61515910.6221500.57

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
14.6%
Passing plays
4.9%
Rushing plays
22.6%
Standard downs
17.3%
Passing downs
9.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.23
Passing downs
1.11
Pass / Rush EPA
0.62 / 0.40

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+2.710−0.66
EPA per play · 2016 · 13 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.