Skip to content
Shane Carden

#5Shane Carden

QB·East Carolina·201420137.3 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Shane Carden is a 2-year Clutch Passer for East Carolina. Shane's 2014 season ranks in the 10th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 704 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Shane Carden's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2014 Production

Passing
392/617 Comp/Att4736 Pass yards30 Pass TD10 INT63.5% Comp %
Rushing
76 Rush yards6 Rush TD96 Carries0.8 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2014 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency10
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat27
  • Consistency80
  • Clutch100
Player type
Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)10th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency80th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.23 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.71 EPA/play in Wk 6 vs SMU (SP+ -21).

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Jordan TravisFlorida State0.47610.1328.3
Sam HartmanWake Forest0.55611.8359.6
Kyle McCordSyracuse0.50912.1321.4
Casey ThompsonNebraska0.52812.6351.4
Drake MayeNorth Carolina0.52313.0369.6

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.7100.71Wk 1 vs North Carolina Central: +0.52 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs South Carolina: +0.30 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Virginia Tech: +0.18 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs North Carolina: +0.52 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs SMU: +0.71 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs South Florida: +0.31 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs UConn: +0.30 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Temple: -0.11 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Cincinnati: +0.13 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Tulane: +0.32 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Tulsa: +0.39 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs UCF: +0.37 EPA/play15Wk 1 vs Florida: +0.09 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsNorth Carolina CentralW52-726/372833084.3-100.52
2@South CarolinaL23-3317.432/463211260.12100.30
3@Virginia TechW28-217.823/474273052.31310.18
4vsNorth CarolinaW70-410.030/484384169.0-1420.52
6vsSMUW45-24-21.231/414104090.84700.71
7@South FloridaW28-17-11.824/332501182.6700.31
9vsUConnW31-21-14.138/644452160.63200.30
10@TempleL10-20-4.724/412170033.3-40-0.11
12@CincinnatiL46-546.935/614252071.9-3410.13
13vsTulaneW34-6-15.031/443581069.81210.32
14@TulsaW49-32-15.828/413384171.1910.39
15vsUCFL30-325.736/483973264.6200.37
1vsFloridaL20-2817.334/664272231.0-1400.09

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
66.0%
Passing plays
97.1%
Rushing plays
16.3%
Standard downs
63.6%
Passing downs
71.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.19
Passing downs
0.49
Pass / Rush EPA
0.31 / 0.04

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.970−0.212014
EPA per play · 2013 — 2014 · 26 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2013East Carolina
6.7
157.3
2014East Carolina
7.3
265.6

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.