Skip to content
Drake Maye

#10Drake Maye

QB·North Carolina·2023202213.0 pts line value1st Round

Drake Maye is a 2-year Dual-Threat QB for North Carolina. Drake's 2022 season ranks in the 60th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 679 plays — a average rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Drake Maye's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2022 Production

Passing
342/516 Comp/Att4321 Pass yards38 Pass TD7 INT66.3% Comp %
Rushing
699 Rush yards7 Rush TD184 Carries3.8 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2022 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency60
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat96
  • Consistency81
  • Clutch92
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)60th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency81th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 7 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.39 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.76 EPA/play in Wk 5 vs Virginia Tech (SP+ -10).

NIL Market Tier· 2022

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Casey ThompsonNebraska0.52812.6351.4
Sam EhlingerTexas0.53513.2349.0
Dak PrescottMississippi State0.51413.6336.6
Clayton TuneHouston0.54213.9353.3
Trace McSorleyPenn State0.51312.7321.0

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.7600.76Wk 1 vs Florida A&M: +0.70 EPA/play1Wk 1 vs App State: +0.70 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Georgia State: +0.47 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs Notre Dame: +0.65 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Virginia Tech: +0.76 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Miami: +0.40 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Duke: +0.56 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs Pittsburgh: +0.49 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Virginia: +0.39 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Wake Forest: +0.29 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Georgia Tech: +0.06 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs NC State: +0.07 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Clemson: -0.08 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Oregon: +0.26 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsFlorida A&MW56-2429/372945092.75500.70
1@App StateW63-611.724/353524094.37610.70
2@Georgia StateW35-28-3.319/242842182.21500.47
4vsNotre DameL32-4510.317/323015088.53700.65
5vsVirginia TechW41-10-9.526/363633094.87320.76
6@MiamiW27-24-2.719/283092289.65300.40
7@DukeW38-355.028/383803076.67000.56
9vsPittsburghW42-248.634/443885093.46100.49
10@VirginiaW31-28-9.026/372932088.07410.39
11@Wake ForestW36-348.231/494483083.37110.29
12vsGeorgia TechL17-21-11.816/302020134.91300.06
13vsNC StateL27-306.829/492331163.63210.07
14vsClemsonL10-3917.626/4226802241-0.08
1vsOregonL27-2818.918/35206304500.26

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
68.1%
Passing plays
98.8%
Rushing plays
31.8%
Standard downs
59.3%
Passing downs
87.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.30
Passing downs
0.56
Pass / Rush EPA
0.41 / 0.38

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.840−0.172023
EPA per play · 2022 — 2023 · 26 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2022North Carolina
13.0
369.6
2023North Carolina
9.7
275.0

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.