Skip to content
Sam Ehlinger

#11Sam Ehlinger

QB·Texas·20202019201813.2 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Sam Ehlinger is a 3-year Dual-Threat QB for Texas. Sam's 2019 season ranks in the 65th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 604 plays — a average rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Sam Ehlinger's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2019 Production

Passing
296/454 Comp/Att3663 Pass yards32 Pass TD10 INT65.2% Comp %
Rushing
663 Rush yards7 Rush TD163 Carries4.1 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2019 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency65
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat99
  • Consistency83
  • Clutch100
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)65th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency83th %ile · above avg
Career trajectory:→ Stable
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.76 EPA/play in Wk 14 vs Texas Tech (SP+ 3).

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Trace McSorleyPenn State0.51312.7321.0
Bailey ZappeWestern Kentucky0.60013.3372.0
Ryan HigginsLouisiana Tech0.58613.7334.6
Baker MayfieldOklahoma0.56114.1323.7
Kyle McCordSyracuse0.50912.1321.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.7600.76Wk 1 vs Louisiana Tech: +0.28 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs LSU: +0.33 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Rice: +0.72 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Oklahoma State: +0.63 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs West Virginia: +0.41 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Oklahoma: +0.18 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Kansas: +0.61 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs TCU: +0.31 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Kansas State: +0.24 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Iowa State: +0.25 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Baylor: -0.04 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Texas Tech: +0.76 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Utah: +0.59 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsLouisiana TechW45-140.228/382764090.73400.28
2vsLSUL38-4533.131/474014075.46010.33
3vsRiceW48-13-18.023/272793096.82700.72
4vsOklahoma StateW36-308.720/282814188.67000.63
6@West VirginiaW42-31-7.018/332112170.24520.41
7vsOklahomaL27-3422.926/382100035.2-920.18
8vsKansasW50-48-9.831/443994190.09100.61
9@TCUL27-376.722/483212444.54300.31
11vsKansas StateW27-246.022/29263114000.24
12@Iowa StateL21-2312.622/40273302700.25
13@BaylorL10-2417.822/3720001790-0.04
14vsTexas TechW49-242.719/27348208310.76
1vsUtahW38-1019.512/18201317310.59

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
64.3%
Passing plays
96.8%
Rushing plays
29.2%
Standard downs
58.5%
Passing downs
77.3%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.20
Passing downs
0.66
Pass / Rush EPA
0.36 / 0.39

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.960−0.1320192020
EPA per play · 2018 — 2020 · 37 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2018Texas
10.0
309.0
2019Texas
13.2
349.0
2020Texas
9.1
222.4

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.