Skip to content
East Carolina

East Carolina Pirates

American Athletic·0-2·
Compare
Elo
1477#69
SP+
-8.1#102
FPI
-3.2
AP
NR
Next@ Old Dominion · Wk 3Win prob 43%Model +2.8
Talent #83 (623.8)Recruiting class #9414% production returning

Roster · 119 players

FR 24SO 18JR 31SR 46
#PlayerPosClHtWt
7Cole HodgeQBSO6'0"198
9Emory WilliamsQBSR6'5"225
11Daulton PhalinesQBFR6'5"210
12Mitch GriffisQBSR6'0"195
13Trey BurkeQBFR6'3"205
3Ashton GrayRBJR6'0"208
4TJ Engleman Jr.RBJR5'9"189
5DeJuan LacyRBJR5'8"203
21Michael AllenRBSR5'11"206
22Michael BeattyRBJR5'6"162
23Meliq McgowanRBFR6'0"190
26DaMari GanttRBJR5'10"197
0Kyler PearsonWRSR5'8"168
1Ray Ray Joseph Jr.WRSR5'11"186
2Tyler JohnsonWRSR6'0"186
7Landon SidesWRSR5'11"190
10Brock SpaldingWRSR5'11"193
11Jeremiah MelvinWRJR6'4"205
14Dillon LorickWRJR6'0"200
15Ja'Keith HamiltonWRSR6'2"206
17Johnny WilliamsWRSO5'9"180
19Jaquaize PettawayWRSR5'10"194
24Jason DickersonWRJR5'10"189
80Ty JohnsonWRJR6'0"180
81Mason ScottWRJR6'0"181
84Connor HodgeWRSO6'1"183
87Trenton CloudWRJR5'11"193
88Dawson QuartermanWRFR6'2"200
6Kanen HamlettTESR6'4"235
8Ismael Smith FloresTESR6'5"255
45Mason BrownTESR6'4"261
82Gage RealeTESR6'3"238
85Stephen CollierTESO6'2"242
86Kaleb MorrowTESO6'5"259
89Jacob HollandTEFR6'5"245
50Joshua BattleOLFR6'5"285
52Zach CaulderOLSR6'1"251
54Niko PaicOLSR6'2"290
55Ethan KramerOLSR6'4"300
56Bryson EsserOLJR6'8"295
57Ian HemilrightOLJR6'4"280
58Brandon BestOLSR6'4"313
59Xavier MasseyOLFR6'3"290
61Brooks CulpOLFR6'4"310
63Alex LuebkeOLFR6'4"283
65Preston BroadwayOLFR6'3"270
66Marleo NeolienOLSR6'7"310
67Cayman ReynoldsOLSO6'4"234
68Tre HardisonOLSR6'4"317
69Kendall WaltonOLSO6'5"313
71Bryce WeaverOLSR6'4"317
72Christian HarrisOLSR6'7"305
73Karson JonesOLSR6'4"282
74Jeremiah WilliamsOLJR6'4"322
75Hayes CreelOLSR6'7"320
77Ja'Vaughn HargettOLFR6'5"260
78Peyton ReederOLSO6'4"300
79Justin GarrardOLFR6'4"325
0Jasiyah RobinsonDLSR6'3"265
5Kieran DavisDLSR6'2"250
9Kendrick DuJourDLSR6'5"223
33Terande SpencerDLFR6'3"235
40Dylon WorthenDLSO6'2"243
44Preston CarrDLSR6'3"295
50Evan PowellDLSO6'4"247
51Zyon RatchfordDLFR6'3"215
55Dominick MoodyDLSO6'2"271
88Rion RoseboroughDLSR6'2"295
90Josiah DwyerDLSO6'2"281
91Miles ParkerDLJR6'4"255
94Javon WilliamsDLJR6'2"303
95Ethan WilsonDLFR6'5"240
97Jacoby MartinDLJR6'2"264
98Torin BrazellDLJR6'2"278
99Kelton SmithDLFR6'4"310
1Jackson BarkerLBSR6'2"227
10Crews LawLBJR6'1"225
11DJ Johnson Jr.LBSR6'0"224
20Cade LawLBSR6'1"225
32LJ PorterLBFR6'0"215
35Landon LewisLBSO6'3"205
41Jayden OldenLBJR6'1"230
42Julien DavisLBSR6'2"239
43Jordan MilesLBSO6'1"200
49Chad FairchildLBFR6'0"235
53Matt PayesLBFR6'3"210
59Reagan PrintyLBJR6'1"217
2Jaylen BowdenDBSR6'1"180
3Zyeir GambleDBSR5'10"195
4Kevon Merrell Jr.DBJR6'1"188
6DeMarius HinesDBJR5'11"194
7Ashton Levells-MitchellDBSR6'1"170
8Kamaurri McKinleyDBSR6'2"186
12Myles PollardDBSR6'2"190
13Ayden DuncansonDBSR6'0"194
14Derrion HorsleyDBSO6'2"196
15Christian PetersonDBJR5'10"185
17Rae'mon MosbyDBJR6'0"190
19Jurnee LattimoreDBJR5'10"167
21Jonathan AkinsDBSR5'11"199
22Angelo RossDBSO6'1"170
23Josh BentonDBSR5'11"200
23Tavius Horne Jr.DBSO5'11"166
24Durante SpeerDBSO6'0"195
25Callaway WilliamsDBFR6'0"195
26Alex MoyeDBJR6'2"190
27Miles GaddyDBJR6'1"185
28David Coleman Jr.DBFR5'11"165
31Djimon MclendonDBFR5'11"175
34Adam ColeDBSR6'0"185
37Amare MackDBFR5'11"175
38Riley RobinsonDBFR6'1"225
43Noah PerezPKSR5'7"161
93Everett ScottPKJR5'10"180
95Andrew ConradPKSR5'10"184
48Tomas O'HalloranPJR6'3"200
83Elliot HuetherPSR6'3"211
53Blake ShirleyLSSR6'0"205
97Cole WalkerLSJR6'4"236

Team Statistics · per game, with national FBS rank

Points / game
17.0
scoring offense
Points allowed
37.5
scoring defense
Differential
-20.5
per game
Offense
Total yards / game
289.5#118
Yards / play
5.1#107
Passing yards / game
195.0#95
Rushing yards / game
94.5#119
First downs / game
13.5#126
3rd down %
9.1%#135
4th down %
100.0%#1
Time of possession
22:31#134
Defense
Yards allowed / game
441.0#118
Yards / play allowed
5.8#103
Pass yards allowed / game
263.5#115
Rush yards allowed / game
177.5#116
3rd down % allowed
44.8%#105
Sacks
3#58
Tackles for loss
15#17
Turnovers & Discipline
Turnover margin
-2#109
Takeaways
1#88
Giveaways
3#95
Penalties / game
7.5#92
Penalty yards / game
66.5#104

Rank is national among all FBS teams (#1 = best), oriented so higher rank = better even for defensive and discipline metrics. Bars show percentile.

Scouting Report · 2026 projection

East Carolina is in year 3 under Blake Harrell. The strengths are on both sides of the ball, led by 3rd at stuffing runs at the line. The way in is 119th at hitting chunk plays.

East Carolina has played 1 game against a soft slate, adjusted for here. That football carries about 0% of what is below; the rest is still the preseason projection.

Projected strengths

  • Defensegetting stopped at the line
    #3
    projected
  • Offensegetting stopped at the line
    #19
    projected

Projected soft spots

  • Offensehitting chunk plays
    #119
    projected

Each bar is where this team sits in the country. Before the season has produced enough football these are PROJECTIONS — last season regressed to the mean, plus talent, returning production, recruiting and whether the staff is the same one — and the season replaces them as it is played. Head coaches only — there is no free feed for coordinators, so on a program where the head coach does not call the offense this describes the staff he hired. Play-calling identity is a style, not a grade: throwing more than the situations warrant is not better than throwing less than they warrant.

2026 Season Projection

model win prob · 9 to play
4.5 – 6.5
projected final record (now 0–2)
Exp. wins left
4.5
of 9 games
Bowl odds
23%
reach 6 wins
Best odds
75%
vs Rice
Toughest
22%
vs Army

How the season could finish · 2026 · chance of each final win total · 9 games left

Every remaining game simulated from the model's win probability for it. Tallest bar is the single likeliest finish, not a prediction that it happens.

0123456789
final winstallest bar = 26% chance
Likeliest finish 4-7 (26%)Bowl eligible 23% · marked on the axis at 6

Player Value

EPA contribution by position group + estimated NIL market value (derived from position rates and on-field production — not actual deal figures).

Unit Value — Total EPA
WRTyler Johnson, Nathaniel Joseph +3
+13.5 EPA
QBMitch Griffis
+11.0 EPA
RBMichael Allen, TJ Engleman +1
+4.2 EPA

Total EPA produced by each positional group this season. OL value is captured via the rush/pass efficiency of skill players; OL-specific EPA isn't separately reported.

Estimated NIL Market Value
ESTIMATED
QBMitch Griffis
~$630K
EPA +11.00.175/play63 snaps
RBAshton Gray
~$167K
EPA +2.60.107/play24 snaps

Estimated from position-group market rates and on-field EPA contribution. Actual NIL valuations depend on social media following, brand fit, and market negotiations — these figures are directional only.

The Five Factors

ranked vs. FBS · bar = better
Efficiency (PPA)
Off0.1738th#86
Def0.2615th#118
Explosiveness
Off1.2547th#74
Def1.2852nd#67
Field position
Off74.881st#27
Def69.876th#34
Finishing (pts/opp)
Off4.2555th#63
Def4.5315th#117
Turnovers
Won 1Lost 3
Margin -2

Opponent-adjusted efficiency

EPA/play vs. schedule
Offense
—
Defense
—
Off · pass
0.1928th#100
Off · rush
0.1347th#73

Pass vs. rush (PPA)

Rushing
Off0.1347th#74
Def0.1725th#104
Passing
Off0.1926th#102
Def0.4021st#109

Trenches & disruption

Line yards (off)
2.37#118
2nd-level / open-field
1.11 / 1.16
Power / stuff (off)
66.7% / 26.7%
Havoc — total (def)
12.4%#109
Havoc — front 7 / DB
11.1% / 1.3%

Standard vs. passing downs

Pro
Std downs
Off0.26
Def-0.00
Pass downs
Off-0.05
Def0.71

PPA on each down type (off vs. def).

Opponent-adjusted by down

Pro
1st2nd3rd
Offense0.09#650.36#48-0.07#131
Defense-0.16#430.37#1110.93#126

Elo Trajectory

@AlabamaFinal
Elo rating 1562 → 1465-97 over season

Team Fingerprint · 2026 · 43 opponent-adjusted metrics · percentile vs 138 FBS teams

Plot these →
worst in FBSbest

Efficiency

  • Offense EPA/play-0.204th
  • Defense EPA/play allowed0.2918th
  • Offense success rate22%2nd
  • Defense success rate allowed53%8th

Downs

  • Offense success — standard downs20%1st
  • Offense success — passing downs25%26th
  • Defense success allowed — standard downs54%12th
  • Defense success allowed — passing downs48%7th

Explosiveness

  • Offense explosiveness1.591st
  • Defense explosiveness allowed1.167th
  • Offense explosiveness — standard downs1.393rd
  • Offense explosiveness — passing downs1.942nd

Trenches

  • Offense line yards0.131st
  • Defense line yards allowed3.319th
  • Offense highlight yards0.007th
  • Defense highlight yards allowed0.6752nd
  • Offense power success0.007th
  • Defense power success allowed0.8334th
  • Offense stuff rate0.373rd
  • Defense stuff rate0.1735th

Third down

  • Third down conversion0%1st
  • Third down distance faced9.44th
  • Third down conversion allowed53%14th
  • Third down distance forced7.145th

Halves

  • Net success rate — first half-0.238th
  • Net success rate — second half-0.351st

Drives

  • Points per drive0.2711th
  • Points per drive allowed4.112th
  • Average starting field position2847th
  • Opponent starting field position3037th
  • Available yards gained23%10th
  • Available yards allowed67%18th
  • Scoring opportunities per drive73%36th
  • Scoring opportunities allowed90%33rd
  • Points per scoring opportunity1.315th
  • Points allowed per opportunity4.613th
  • Three-and-out rate45%15th
  • Three-and-outs forced20%38th

Roster

  • Returning usage14%13th
  • Returning EPA50.629th
  • Team talent composite62440th
  • Recruiting class rank94.032nd
  • Recruiting class points17932nd

Every metric is opponent-adjusted and ranked so that higher is always better — a defensive rate that is good when low is ranked accordingly. Sack and tackle-for-loss composition are deliberately absent: their relationship to team quality is a measured null, so they carry a style rather than a rank, and they appear in the pressure signature instead.

Intelligence Report

⚡

Offensive DNA

Balanced offense — below average EPA/play nationally
EPA/play
+0.174#86 · average
Pass EPA/play
+0.190#102
Rush EPA/play
+0.135#74
Explosiveness
1.246#74
Pts/opportunity
4.25#63
Success rate
42.9%

Pass efficiency edge: 0.055 EPA/play

🛡

Defensive Identity

Disciplined defense — allowing above-average EPA/play
EPA/play allowed
+0.257#118 · bottom 20%
Havoc rate (total)
12.4%#109
Front-7 havoc
11.1%
DB havoc
1.3%
Big play rate allowed
1.276#67
Success rate allowed
45.5%

Disruption comes primarily from the front seven.

📊

Season Signature

17.0 PPG offense, 37.5 allowed — -20.5 margin/game
Points per game
17.0
Points allowed/game
37.5
Scoring margin/game
-20.5
Turnover margin
-2won 1 · lost 3
Production returning
14%
Talent rank (247)
#83

0-2 record through 2 games.

Team Shape · percentile vs. FBS · dashed = 50th

OFFENSE38thEXPLOSIVENESS47thFINISHING55thFIELD POS81thDEFENSE15thHAVOC21th50th100th
Offense
38th
Explosiveness
47th
Finishing
55th
Field Pos
81th
Defense
15th
Havoc
21th

Each axis = national percentile rank. 100th = best in FBS, 0th = worst. Defense and Havoc are oriented so higher = better.

CORE efficiency · situation and opponent removed

Points per 100 plays above average, after the game state is regressed out of every snap and the schedule is solved out across the whole league. The version of this team’s efficiency that can be compared to a team it never played.

Overall
-6.3
#93
Offense
-6.1
#113
Defense
+0.2
#74
Full CORE ratings →

What a possession is worth · 11 drives

MeasureOffenseDefense
Points per drive0.274.10
Starting field positionown 27.9own 30.0
Available yards23.3%67.3%
Scoring opportunities72.7%90.0%
Points per opportunity1.254.56
Three-and-out rate45.5%20.0%
Every team’s drive efficiency →

National Landscape · 2026 FBS · offense vs. defense EPA/play

Each dot = one FBS team. East Carolina is highlighted. Tap or hover a dot for details.

ELITEDEF. FORTRESSOFF. POWERHOUSEREBUILDING-0.100.00+0.10+0.20+0.30-0.050.00+0.10+0.20Offensive EPA/play← worsebetter →Defensive EPA allowed/play← worsebetter →

Similar Programs

Teams with the closest offense + defense efficiency profile to East Carolina in 2026

by EPA/play distance
AkronSP+ -21.4
Off EPA/play +0.190Def EPA/play +0.228Elo 929
Match
98%
RutgersSP+ -3.6
Off EPA/play +0.124Def EPA/play +0.234Elo 1372
Match
97%
Oregon StateSP+ -6.8
Off EPA/play +0.183Def EPA/play +0.312Elo 1260
Match
97%
Boise StateSP+ +5.2
Off EPA/play +0.113Def EPA/play +0.277Elo 1569
Match
97%
Florida StateSP+ +6.9
Off EPA/play +0.242Def EPA/play +0.268Elo 1557
Match
97%
Texas StateSP+ -7.8
Off EPA/play +0.185Def EPA/play +0.326Elo 1441
Match
96%

Similarity = normalized Euclidean distance on season offensive and defensive EPA/play. Teams within ±0.02 EPA/play on both units score >90%.

Program Trajectory · CORE rating · 2015–2026 · points per game vs an average FBS team

2015: +1.6, #64 of 1282016: -11.2, #98 of 1282017: -27.2, #125 of 1302018: -12.6, #104 of 1302019: -18.0, #118 of 1302020: -6.8, #87 of 1242021: +2.0, #64 of 1302022: +4.5, #52 of 1312023: -20.0, #125 of 1332024: -0.5, #69 of 1342025: +7.8, #46 of 1362026: -6.3, #93 of 138
20152026
Now -6.3 · #93 of 138Best +7.8 in 2025Worst -27.2 in 2017

Program History

recent seasons
YearOverallConfWin %xWLuck
20260-20-0
0%
0.3-0.3
20259-46-2
69%
8.7+0.3
20248-55-3
62%
7.0+1.0
20232-101-7
17%
3.5-1.5
20228-54-4
62%
8.0+0.0
20217-55-3
58%
5.7+1.3
20203-63-5
33%
3.9-0.9
20194-81-7
33%
3.5+0.5
20183-91-7
25%
4.7-1.7
20173-92-6
25%
3.1-0.1

xW = expected wins from per-game dominance. Luck = actual − expected (positive = won close games).

0.7%of 50,000 simulated 2026 seasons end with them in the field

0-1 so far, projected to finish 6.9-5.2. Wins the American Athletic in 5.6%.

If they finish with…

48%
1 loss
4.0%
2 losses
0.0%
3 losses
0%
4 losses

Their chance of making it at each final loss count.

Win out and it is 48%. One bid goes to the best champion outside the four power leagues, so running the table only enters them into that argument.

down 1.8 points since preseason — lost 10-48 to Alabama against an expected margin of −22, so −15.7 against the number.

  • At 1 loss they are 48% where the average American Athletic team is 52%.
  • The American Athletic takes 0.34 bids in an average season.
  • One bid goes to the best champion outside the P4. They take it in 0.7% of seasons, having won their league in 99% of those.

East Carolina’s own turning points

Points of playoff probability between winning and losing.

  • wk8at Memphis2.7
  • wk12at Army1.8
  • wk10vs South Florida1.4
  • wk3at Old Dominion1.4
  • wk9vs Temple1.1
  • wk13vs Florida Atlantic1.1

Who to root for

Games East Carolina is not in that move its odds most. Same units, much smaller scale.

  • wk9Texas State over Boise State0.4
  • wk3Oklahoma over New Mexico0.4
  • wk10Southern Miss over James Madison0.3
  • wk2Virginia Tech over Old Dominion0.3
  • wk8Kennesaw State over Liberty0.3
  • wk2North Texas over UNLV0.3
The full playoff picture →

American Athletic

0-0 in league play, projected 4.7-3.37 of 14 by title odds
5.6%
Wins the American Athletic
14%
Reaches the title game

The American Athletic sends its top two by conference winning percentage, head-to-head breaking a tie. The last berth is level on percentage in 33% of simulated seasons, so a tiebreaker decides it about that often.

  • wk8East Carolina at Memphis14.3
  • wk12East Carolina at Army10.1
  • wk10South Florida at East Carolina8.8
  • wk9Temple at East Carolina7.2

Points of title probability riding on each result. The whole American Athletic race →

If not the playoff, then

75%
Bowl eligible
61%
Placed in a bowl
0.7%
In the playoff
38%
Season over in November

East Carolina is 0-1 and needs 6 more wins from 11 games to reach the six that make a team eligible — at most one of which may come against an FCS opponent. In 13% of seasons they get there and still go nowhere: there are more eligible teams than seats.

  • Fenway Bowl10%
  • Armed Forces Bowl10%
  • Birmingham Bowl8.3%
  • Military Bowl8.0%
  • Gasparilla Bowl7.7%
  • First Responder Bowl5.0%

Every bowl, and how each one picks →

Recruiting Pipelines

since 2010

Of the 170 high-school programs with a pipeline page here, 6 have sent East Carolina a player since 2010 — 12 signees between them. Where they signed, not where they were offered, and not a complete list of East Carolina's feeder schools: only these 170 have the outcome history to measure.

High schoolSignedDrafted
Cardinal GibbonsFL30
Fork Union Military AcademyVA20
Highland SpringsVA20
MillbrookNC20
NorthwesternFL20
Lake DallasTX10
All 170 high-school pipelines →
✓/✗ = whether our pregame model picked the winner. Win % & projections from the Gridpex model. Data: CollegeFootballData.