Skip to content
Shane Carden

#5Shane Carden

QB·East Carolina·201420136.7 pts line value1st Round

Shane Carden is a 2-year Dual-Threat QB for East Carolina. Shane's 2013 season ranks in the 93th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 465 plays — a elite rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Shane Carden's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2013 Production

Passing
387/549 Comp/Att4139 Pass yards33 Pass TD10 INT70.5% Comp %
Rushing
103 Rush yards10 Rush TD90 Carries1.1 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2013 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency93
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat74
  • Consistency88
  • Clutch100
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)93th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency88th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among QBs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 8 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.08 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.87 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Old Dominion.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.8700.87Wk 1 vs Old Dominion: +0.87 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Florida Atlantic: +0.66 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Virginia Tech: +0.43 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs North Carolina: +0.34 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Middle Tennessee: +0.41 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Tulane: +0.37 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Southern Miss: +0.57 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Florida International: +0.32 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Tulsa: +0.74 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs UAB: +0.65 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs NC State: +0.46 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Marshall: +0.21 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Ohio: +0.20 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsOld DominionW52-3846/544475091.9-400.87
2vsFlorida AtlanticW31-13-6.617/251912053.3-400.66
3vsVirginia TechL10-1514.919/31158139.81000.43
5@North CarolinaW55-3113.732/473763187.22230.34
6@Middle TennesseeW24-17-11.843/573651081.1210.41
7@TulaneL33-36-8.041/554801161.3-2500.37
8vsSouthern MissW55-14-24.530/373083091.8110.57
10@Florida InternationalW34-13-38.923/352643086.41800.32
11vsTulsaW58-24-18.734/503845084.42520.74
12vsUABW63-14-20.821/313475281.1-200.65
13@NC StateW42-28-0.523/302553091.0620.46
14@MarshallL28-598.329/522910339.41410.21
1vsOhioW37-20-11.429/452731060.44000.20

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
52.4%
Passing plays
84.7%
Rushing plays
11.8%
Standard downs
48.8%
Passing downs
60.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.29
Passing downs
0.73
Pass / Rush EPA
0.46 / 0.27

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.970−0.212014
EPA per play · 2013 — 2014 · 26 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2013East Carolina
6.7
157.3
2014East Carolina
7.3
265.6

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.