Skip to content
Sean Clifford

#14Sean Clifford

QB·Penn State·2022202020197.5 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Sean Clifford is a 3-year Dual-Threat QB for Penn State. Sean's 2022 season ranks in the 40th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 416 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Sean Clifford's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2022 Production

Passing
226/351 Comp/Att2822 Pass yards24 Pass TD7 INT64.4% Comp %
Rushing
185 Rush yards5 Rush TD70 Carries2.6 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2022 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency40
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat84
  • Consistency86
  • Clutch100
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)40th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency86th %ile · above avg
Career trajectory:→ Stable
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.66 EPA/play in Wk 13 vs Michigan State (SP+ 1).

NIL Market Tier· 2022

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.6600.66Wk 1 vs Purdue: +0.20 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Ohio: +0.24 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Auburn: +0.48 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Central Michigan: +0.43 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Northwestern: +0.17 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Michigan: +0.29 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Minnesota: +0.64 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Ohio State: +0.15 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Indiana: +0.28 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Maryland: +0.18 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Rutgers: +0.35 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Michigan State: +0.66 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs Utah: +0.46 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1@PurdueW35-317.720/372824175.41110.20
2vsOhioW46-10-4.619/272131065.71410.24
3@AuburnW41-125.114/191780068.41510.48
4vsCentral MichiganW33-14-14.022/342173064.62310.43
5vsNorthwesternW17-7-13.410/201401137.91300.17
7@MichiganL17-4132.07/191200078.67400.29
8vsMinnesotaW45-1716.023/312954192.80.64
9vsOhio StateL31-4431.132/473713363.9-1000.15
10@IndianaW45-14-7.115/232290153.3-200.28
11vsMarylandW30-011.212/231391052.31300.18
12@RutgersW55-10-9.117/261571076.73510.35
13vsMichigan StateW35-161.219/242024083.6000.66
1vsUtahW35-2119.216/2127920-100.46

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
45.8%
Passing plays
82.7%
Rushing plays
11.3%
Standard downs
40.3%
Passing downs
58.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.21
Passing downs
0.55
Pass / Rush EPA
0.34 / 0.32

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.060−0.1120202022
EPA per play · 2019 — 2022 · 34 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2019Penn State
7.8
217.9
2020Penn State
7.1
168.2
2022Penn State
7.5
216.9

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.