Skip to content

Penn State Nittany Lions

Big Ten·2-0·
Elo
1891#6
SP+
19.8#13
FPI
17.2
AP
#16
Nextvs Buffalo · Wk 3Win prob 95%Model -25.4
Talent #26 (774.0)Recruiting class #658% production returning

Roster · 112 players

FR 41SO 28JR 22SR 21
#PlayerPosClHtWt
3Rocco BechtQBSR6'1"208
7Alex ManskeQBFR6'3"210
10Connor BarryQBSR6'1"211
12Kase EvansQBFR6'3"200
14Peyton FalzoneQBFR6'5"216
19Jack LambertQBJR6'3"202
1James PeoplesRBJR5'10"214
21Carson HansenRBSR6'2"216
25Quinton Martin Jr.RBSO6'1"212
26Cam WallaceRBJR5'9"206
29D'Antae SheffeyRBFR5'11"201
36Amar'e GloverRBFR6'0"205
37Jeremy WashingtonRBFR
0Chase SowellWRSR6'3"203
2Zay RobinsonWRFR5'11"186
4Brett EskildsenWRJR6'1"198
6Koby HowardWRSO5'11"203
7Peter GonzalezWRSO6'2"211
8Karon BrookinsWRFR6'5"205
11Lyrick SamuelWRFR6'4"183
13Hank LustigWRFR5'9"170
15Keith Jones Jr.WRSO6'4"197
19Amarion JacksonWRFR6'2"192
31Logan CunninghamWRSR5'8"183
81Ben WhitverWRFR6'2"195
82Ethan BlackWRJR5'9"178
18Benjamin BrahmerTESR6'7"250
80Cooper AlexanderTESO6'4"241
83Brian KortovichTEFR6'4"241
84Gabe BurkleTESR6'6"247
87Andrew RappleyeaTEJR6'4"242
89Finn FurmanekTEJR6'3"251
50Cooper CousinsOLJR6'6"320
51Brock RikerOLSO6'4"291
52Dominic RulliOLSR6'3"298
54Vaea IkakoulaOLFR6'3"326
55Chimdy OnohOLJR6'5"320
56Mason BandhauerOLFR6'6"297
61Liam HoranOLSO6'3"292
65Jim FitzgeraldOLSR6'7"337
66Will TompkinsOLFR6'5"311
67Henry BoehmeOLJR6'5"285
68Anthony DonkohOLJR6'5"334
70Trevor BuhrOLJR6'4"318
71Garrett SextonOLSO6'6"315
72Tyshon HuffOLJR6'4"292
74Kuol Kuol IIOLFR6'6"291
75Pete EglitisOLFR6'7"295
76Hunter AlbrightOLFR6'5"326
77Owen AlicieneOLFR6'7"303
78Malachi GoodmanOLFR6'6"330
79Donnie HarbourOLSO6'3"333
1Ikenna EzeoguDESR6'5"273
11LaVar Arrington IIDESO6'3"220
18Max GranvilleDESO6'3"252
19Yvan KemajouDESO6'3"252
33Alexander McPhersonDESO6'6"254
42Mason RobinsonDEJR6'3"255
43Dayshaun BurnettDEFR6'3"226
47Aidan ProbstDESO6'2"246
89Jackson FordDEFR6'5"264
93Bobby MearsDEJR6'4"257
88Elijah ReederDLFR6'6"210
39Ty BlandingDTJR6'1"301
56Alijah CarnellDTSO6'5"299
73Caleb BrewerDTSO6'4"295
90Liam AndrewsDTSO6'4"276
91Armstrong NnodimDTSO6'2"310
92Siale TaupakiDTSR6'2"326
94De'Andre CookDTSO6'4"298
98Dallas VakalahiDTJR6'2"326
99Keanu WilliamsDTSR6'5"317
8Kooper EbelLBSR6'4"233
9Cael BrezinaLBJR6'3"233
10Caleb BaconLBSR6'4"242
13Tony RojasLBJR6'2"236
25Alex TatschLBSO6'2"235
26Cam SmithLBFR6'0"222
32John KlostermanLBSR5'11"223
34Chris FileppoLBSO6'4"219
40Keian KaiserLBFR6'4"215
40Jake LukacLBFR6'1"210
45Josh BanksLBFR6'1"200
46Evan WolffLBFR6'2"215
2Audavion CollinsCBSR5'11"183
5Daryus DixsonCBSO6'0"184
7Zion TracyCBSR5'11"184
12Xxavier ThomasCBFR5'11"180
15Joshua JohnsonCBFR6'2"189
16Donte NastasiCBJR5'10"169
17Josiah ZayasCBFR6'2"205
20Tyrell ChatmanCBFR6'2"196
23Jahmir JosephCBFR6'0"190
29Hunter SowellCBFR5'10"180
35Tyler ArmsteadCBSO6'1"177
37Max HeffnerCBFR5'11"176
3Jamison PattonSSR6'2"206
4Jeremiah CooperSSR6'0"188
21Vaboue ToureSSO6'1"209
24Ibn McDanielsSSO6'3"202
27Omarion DavisSSO5'11"198
28Bryson WilliamsSFR6'4"188
30Christian AskewSFR6'4"199
31Marcus Neal Jr.SJR6'1"216
41Jake LaVerdeSFR6'2"210
94Ryan BarkerPKJR6'2"191
95Cristiano RosaPKSR5'11"205
98Matthew ParkerPKFR6'0"224
38Nathan TiycePSO6'5"232
96Lucas TenbrockPFR6'6"210
35Blaise Sokach-MinnickLSSR6'3"216
92Andrew DufaultLSSO6'1"249

Team Statistics · per game, with national FBS rank

Points / game
36.0
scoring offense
Points allowed
4.5
scoring defense
Differential
+31.5
per game
Offense
Total yards / game
421.5#61
Yards / play
6.4#56
Passing yards / game
296.0#35
Rushing yards / game
125.5#98
First downs / game
24.0#40
3rd down %
51.9%#33
4th down %
66.7%#45
Time of possession
32:31#41
Defense
Yards allowed / game
215.0#28
Yards / play allowed
3.9#35
Pass yards allowed / game
105.0#11
Rush yards allowed / game
110.0#70
3rd down % allowed
21.7%#19
Sacks
3#58
Tackles for loss
11#41
Turnovers & Discipline
Turnover margin
+3#14
Takeaways
3#30
Giveaways
0#1
Penalties / game
4.0#19
Penalty yards / game
32.5#20

Rank is national among all FBS teams (#1 = best), oriented so higher rank = better even for defensive and discipline metrics. Bars show percentile.

Scouting Report · 2026 projection

pass-leaning

Penn State throws it: Matt Campbell's offenses have been pass-leaning across 11 seasons. The strengths are defensive, led by 17th at keeping everything in front of them.

On fourth down he goes for it about as often as his peers do from the same spots (−1.6%). Against what the expected-points model recommends he is −27.2% — the profession as a whole is negative on this.

Penn State has played 1 game against an average slate, adjusted for here. That football carries about 0% of what is below; the rest is still the preseason projection.

Projected strengths

  • Defensehitting chunk plays
    #17
    projected

Each bar is where this team sits in the country. Before the season has produced enough football these are PROJECTIONS — last season regressed to the mean, plus talent, returning production, recruiting and whether the staff is the same one — and the season replaces them as it is played. Head coaches only — there is no free feed for coordinators, so on a program where the head coach does not call the offense this describes the staff he hired. Play-calling identity is a style, not a grade: throwing more than the situations warrant is not better than throwing less than they warrant.

2026 Season Projection

model win prob · 10 to play
7.24.8
projected final record (now 20)
Exp. wins left
5.2
of 10 games
Bowl odds
89%
reach 6 wins
Best odds
95%
vs Buffalo
Toughest
13%
vs USC

How the season could finish · 2026 · chance of each final win total · 10 games left

Every remaining game simulated from the model's win probability for it. Tallest bar is the single likeliest finish, not a prediction that it happens.

23456789101112
final winstallest bar = 28% chance
Likeliest finish 7-5 (28%)Bowl eligible 89% · marked on the axis at 6

Player Value

EPA contribution by position group + estimated NIL market value (derived from position rates and on-field production — not actual deal figures).

Unit Value — Total EPA
QBRocco Becht
+41.2 EPA
WRChase Sowell, Koby Howard +2
+37.4 EPA
TEBenjamin Brahmer, Andrew Rappleyea
+5.7 EPA
RBCarson Hansen, James Peoples +1
-2.5 EPA

Total EPA produced by each positional group this season. OL value is captured via the rush/pass efficiency of skill players; OL-specific EPA isn't separately reported.

Estimated NIL Market Value
ESTIMATED
QBRocco Becht
~$1.1M
EPA +41.20.824/play50 snaps
EPA +0.80.025/play32 snaps

Estimated from position-group market rates and on-field EPA contribution. Actual NIL valuations depend on social media following, brand fit, and market negotiations — these figures are directional only.

The Five Factors

ranked vs. FBS · bar = better
Efficiency (PPA)
Off0.4178th#31
Def0.0558th#58
Explosiveness
Off1.3571st#41
Def1.0977th#32
Field position
Off66.320th#111
Def79.14th#133
Finishing (pts/opp)
Off4.0649th#71
Def2.0081st#27
Turnovers
Won 3Lost 0
Margin +3

Opponent-adjusted efficiency

EPA/play vs. schedule
Offense
Defense
Off · pass
0.9094th#9
Off · rush
-0.0618th#113

Pass vs. rush (PPA)

Rushing
Off-0.0618th#114
Def0.0940th#83
Passing
Off0.9094th#9
Def-0.0082nd#25

Trenches & disruption

Line yards (off)
2.30#121
2nd-level / open-field
0.96 / 0.08
Power / stuff (off)
85.7% / 8.0%
Havoc — total (def)
17.7%#60
Havoc — front 7 / DB
11.5% / 6.2%

Standard vs. passing downs

Pro
Std downs
Off0.30
Def-0.08
Pass downs
Off0.82
Def0.29

PPA on each down type (off vs. def).

Opponent-adjusted by down

Pro
1st2nd3rd
Offense0.18#480.49#281.01#19
Defense-0.09#540.04#590.30#63

Elo Trajectory

MarshallFinal
Elo rating 18021910+108 over season

Team Fingerprint · 2026 · 43 opponent-adjusted metrics · percentile vs 138 FBS teams

Plot these →
worst in FBSbest

Efficiency

  • Offense EPA/play0.4277th
  • Defense EPA/play allowed-0.1786th
  • Offense success rate51%69th
  • Defense success rate allowed29%77th

Downs

  • Offense success — standard downs56%72nd
  • Offense success — passing downs33%52nd
  • Defense success allowed — standard downs34%77th
  • Defense success allowed — passing downs20%73rd

Explosiveness

  • Offense explosiveness1.365th
  • Defense explosiveness allowed0.8996th
  • Offense explosiveness — standard downs1.168th
  • Offense explosiveness — passing downs2.483rd

Trenches

  • Offense line yards3.150th
  • Defense line yards allowed1.098th
  • Offense highlight yards0.1414th
  • Defense highlight yards allowed0.0099th
  • Offense power success0.8673rd
  • Defense power success allowed0.5079th
  • Offense stuff rate0.1463rd
  • Defense stuff rate0.4296th

Third down

  • Third down conversion50%66th
  • Third down distance faced5.973rd
  • Third down conversion allowed20%85th
  • Third down distance forced8.372nd

Halves

  • Net success rate — first half0.1353rd
  • Net success rate — second half0.2582nd

Drives

  • Points per drive4.185th
  • Points per drive allowed0.0098th
  • Average starting field position3278th
  • Opponent starting field position2390th
  • Available yards gained68%82nd
  • Available yards allowed18%97th
  • Scoring opportunities per drive100%99th
  • Scoring opportunities allowed58%89th
  • Points per scoring opportunity4.181st
  • Points allowed per opportunity0.0099th
  • Three-and-out rate18%73rd
  • Three-and-outs forced58%98th

Roster

  • Returning usage4%4th
  • Returning EPA21.510th
  • Team talent composite77482nd
  • Recruiting class rank65.053rd
  • Recruiting class points19453rd

Every metric is opponent-adjusted and ranked so that higher is always better — a defensive rate that is good when low is ranked accordingly. Sack and tackle-for-loss composition are deliberately absent: their relationship to team quality is a measured null, so they carry a style rather than a rank, and they appear in the pressure signature instead.

Intelligence Report

Offensive DNA

Pass-dominant offense performing above the national average
EPA/play
+0.409#31 · above avg
Pass EPA/play
+0.897#9
Rush EPA/play
-0.056#114
Explosiveness
1.353#41
Pts/opportunity
4.06#71
Success rate
50.0%

Pass efficiency edge: 0.953 EPA/play

🛡

Defensive Identity

EPA/play allowed
+0.049#58 · average
Havoc rate (total)
17.7%#60
Front-7 havoc
11.5%
DB havoc
6.2%
Big play rate allowed
1.088#32
Success rate allowed
36.1%

Disruption comes primarily from the front seven.

📊

Season Signature

36.0 PPG offense, 4.5 allowed — +31.5 margin/game
Points per game
36.0
Points allowed/game
4.5
Scoring margin/game
+31.5
Turnover margin
+3won 3 · lost 0
Production returning
8%
Talent rank (247)
#26

2-0 record through 2 games.

Team Shape · percentile vs. FBS · dashed = 50th

OFFENSE78thEXPLOSIVENESS71thFINISHING49thFIELD POS20thDEFENSE58thHAVOC57th50th100th
Offense
78th
Explosiveness
71th
Finishing
49th
Field Pos
20th
Defense
58th
Havoc
57th

Each axis = national percentile rank. 100th = best in FBS, 0th = worst. Defense and Havoc are oriented so higher = better.

CORE efficiency · situation and opponent removed

Points per 100 plays above average, after the game state is regressed out of every snap and the schedule is solved out across the whole league. The version of this team’s efficiency that can be compared to a team it never played.

Overall
+19.4
#13
Offense
+9.6
#16
Defense
-9.9
#16
Full CORE ratings →

What a possession is worth · 11 drives

MeasureOffenseDefense
Points per drive4.090.00
Starting field positionown 32.1own 22.7
Available yards68.4%18.3%
Scoring opportunities100.0%58.3%
Points per opportunity4.090.00
Three-and-out rate18.2%58.3%
Every team’s drive efficiency →

Play-calling identity

Against what the league calls from the same down, distance, field position, score and clock — so this is the staff, not the game script.

Pass rate
50.0%
Expected, given the spots
48.0%
Over expected
+2.0
Fourth down vs peers
+17
Fourth down vs the model
-75
All play-calling tendencies →

National Landscape · 2026 FBS · offense vs. defense EPA/play

Each dot = one FBS team. Penn State is highlighted. Tap or hover a dot for details.

ELITEDEF. FORTRESSOFF. POWERHOUSEREBUILDING-0.100.00+0.10+0.20+0.30-0.050.00+0.10+0.20Offensive EPA/play← worsebetter →Defensive EPA allowed/play← worsebetter →

Similar Programs

Teams with the closest offense + defense efficiency profile to Penn State in 2026

by EPA/play distance
MassachusettsSP+ -25.8
Off EPA/play +0.426Def EPA/play +0.024Elo 1076
Match
98%
Middle TennesseeSP+ -20.8
Off EPA/play +0.402Def EPA/play +0.087Elo 1276
Match
98%
Arizona StateSP+ +8.7
Off EPA/play +0.348Def EPA/play +0.057Elo 1572
Match
97%
MemphisSP+ +2.1
Off EPA/play +0.394Def EPA/play +0.106Elo 1566
Match
97%
San Diego StateSP+ +3.1
Off EPA/play +0.391Def EPA/play +0.113Elo 1518
Match
96%
MissouriSP+ +12.9
Off EPA/play +0.319Def EPA/play +0.020Elo 1703
Match
96%

Similarity = normalized Euclidean distance on season offensive and defensive EPA/play. Teams within ±0.02 EPA/play on both units score >90%.

Program Trajectory · CORE rating · 20152026 · points per game vs an average FBS team

2015: +5.6, #52 of 1282016: +12.3, #23 of 1282017: +27.3, #7 of 1302018: +14.2, #19 of 1302019: +20.8, #15 of 1302020: +3.4, #52 of 1242021: +13.8, #23 of 1302022: +17.7, #10 of 1312023: +21.5, #11 of 1332024: +29.9, #3 of 1342025: +13.0, #32 of 1362026: +19.4, #13 of 138
20152026
Now +19.4 · #13 of 138Best +29.9 in 2024Worst +3.4 in 2020

Program History

recent seasons
YearOverallConfWin %xWLuck
20261-00-0
100%
1.0+0.0
20257-63-6
54%
9.2-2.2
202413-38-2
81%
12.7+0.3
202310-37-2
77%
9.1+0.9
202211-27-2
85%
10.5+0.5
20217-64-5
54%
7.4-0.4
20204-54-5
44%
5.3-1.3
201911-27-2
85%
9.9+1.1
20189-46-3
69%
10.6-1.6
201711-27-2
85%
10.5+0.5

xW = expected wins from per-game dominance. Luck = actual − expected (positive = won close games).

44%of 50,000 simulated 2026 seasons end with them in the field

1-0 so far, projected to finish 9.9-2.4. Top-four bye in 12%. Wins the Big Ten in 12%.

If they finish with…

100%
0 losses
99%
1 loss
52%
2 losses
1.4%
3 losses
0%
4 losses

Their chance of making it at each final loss count. Better than even up to 2.

Win out and it is 100%. Running the table settles it.

up 10.5 points since preseasonwon 45-0 over Marshall against an expected margin of +27, so +18.2 against the number.

  • At 2 losses they are 52% where the average Big Ten team is 72%.
  • The Big Ten takes 3.19 bids in an average season, and four or more in 37%.

Penn State’s own turning points

Points of playoff probability between winning and losing.

  • wk6vs USC41.1
  • wk10at Washington39.3
  • wk7at Michigan38.2
  • wk2at Temple37.0
  • wk5at Northwestern36.0
  • wk13at Maryland35.9

Who to root for

Games Penn State is not in that move its odds most. Same units, much smaller scale.

  • wk9Navy over Notre Dame3.0
  • wk7Rutgers over Maryland2.7
  • wk3Rutgers over USC2.7
  • wk9Rutgers over Michigan2.5
  • wk10Marshall over Georgia Southern2.4
  • wk2Utah State over Washington2.3
The full playoff picture →

Big Ten

0-0 in league play, projected 6.9-2.14 of 18 by title odds
12%
Wins the Big Ten
33%
Reaches the title game

The Big Ten sends its top two by conference winning percentage, head-to-head breaking a tie. The last berth is level on percentage in 50% of simulated seasons, so a tiebreaker decides it about that often.

  • wk6USC at Penn State13.7
  • wk10Penn State at Washington13.4
  • wk7Penn State at Michigan12.7
  • wk13Penn State at Maryland11.8

Points of title probability riding on each result. The whole Big Ten race →

If not the playoff, then

99%
Bowl eligible
54%
Placed in a bowl
44%
In the playoff
1.7%
Season over in November

Penn State is 1-0 and needs 5 more wins from 11 games to reach the six that make a team eligible — at most one of which may come against an FCS opponent.

  • Citrus Bowl13%
  • ReliaQuest Bowl10%
  • Music City Bowl8.4%
  • Las Vegas Bowl6.8%
  • Pinstripe Bowl4.5%
  • Rate Bowl3.6%

Every bowl, and how each one picks →

Recruiting Pipelines

since 2010

Of the 170 high-school programs with a pipeline page here, 9 have sent Penn State a player since 2010 — 28 signees between them. Where they signed, not where they were offered, and not a complete list of Penn State's feeder schools: only these 170 have the outcome history to measure.

High schoolSignedDrafted
DeMatha CatholicMD61
Imhotep InstitutePA51
Central CatholicPA50
Cass TechnicalMI32
Paramus CatholicNJ30
Briar WoodsVA21
NortheastPA20
MiddletownOH11
All 170 high-school pipelines →
✓/✗ = whether our pregame model picked the winner. Win % & projections from the Gridpex model. Data: CollegeFootballData.