Skip to content
Sam Howell

#7Sam Howell

QB·North Carolina·20212020201912.9 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Sam Howell is a 3-year Dual-Threat QB for North Carolina. Sam's 2019 season ranks in the 73th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 506 plays — a average rate for the QB. Production has trended downward season-over-season on adjusted value metrics.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Sam Howell's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

Recruiting Profile· Class of 2019

4-Star · High major target
Stars
247 composite
0.9582
National rank
#93
High school
Sun Valley
Hometown
Monroe, NC

Recruiting data from CFBD/247Sports composite. Sourced from the player's signing-class team — transfers show original school's class.

2019 Production

Passing
259/422 Comp/Att3641 Pass yards38 Pass TD7 INT61.4% Comp %
Rushing
35 Rush yards1 Rush TD94 Carries0.4 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2019 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency73
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat57
  • Consistency82
  • Clutch100
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)73th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency82th %ile · above avg
Career trajectory:↓ Declining
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • Production has slipped season-over-season on adjusted value metrics.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.17 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 1.05 EPA/play in Wk 13 vs Mercer.

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0
Tanner MordecaiSMU0.63014.0321.5
Ryan HigginsLouisiana Tech0.58613.7334.6
J.T. BarrettOhio State0.59314.1341.6
Baker MayfieldOklahoma0.56114.1323.7

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.0501.05Wk 1 vs South Carolina: +0.32 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Miami: +0.51 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Wake Forest: +0.13 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs App State: +0.49 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Clemson: +0.15 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Georgia Tech: +0.48 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Virginia Tech: +0.24 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Duke: +0.28 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Virginia: +0.33 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Pittsburgh: +0.18 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Mercer: +1.05 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs NC State: +0.49 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Temple: +0.76 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsSouth CarolinaW24-204.815/242452027.7600.32
2vsMiamiW28-259.616/242742074.9-900.51
3@Wake ForestL18-242.017/281822025.1-200.13
4vsApp StateL31-3411.327/413233258.22410.49
5vsClemsonL20-2128.115/271442037.2-500.15
6@Georgia TechW38-22-12.033/513764180.5100.48
8@Virginia TechL41-438.026/493485064.6-1000.24
9vsDukeW20-17-1.810/262272226.5-1800.28
10vsVirginiaL31-386.315/2935340-300.33
12@PittsburghL27-344.127/4332231-2300.18
13vsMercerW56-710/13152301701.05
14@NC StateW41-10-6.323/3340131400.49
1vsTempleW55-133.225/34294305300.76

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
53.0%
Passing plays
98.3%
Rushing plays
12.0%
Standard downs
45.8%
Passing downs
67.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.24
Passing downs
0.56
Pass / Rush EPA
0.40 / 0.18

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.150−0.0820202021
EPA per play · 2019 — 2021 · 37 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2019North Carolina
12.9
316.3
2020North Carolina
11.3
263.9
2021North Carolina
7.8
270.4

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.