Skip to content
Sam Hartman

#10Sam Hartman

QB·Wake Forest·202320222021202012.8 pts line value1st Round

Sam Hartman is a 4-year Clutch Passer for Wake Forest. Sam's 2022 season ranks in the 70th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 525 plays — a average rate for the QB. Sam's production has improved each season, a positive development trajectory.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Sam Hartman's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2022 Production

Passing
270/429 Comp/Att3701 Pass yards38 Pass TD12 INT62.9% Comp %
Rushing
130 Rush yards1 Rush TD101 Carries1.3 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2022 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency70
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat24
  • Consistency83
  • Clutch100
Player type
Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)70th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency83th %ile · above avg
Career trajectory:↑ Rising
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • Career trajectory is upward — WEPA value has improved season over season.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 7 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.21 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.71 EPA/play in Wk 8 vs Boston College (SP+ -15).

NIL Market Tier· 2022

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0
Ryan HigginsLouisiana Tech0.58613.7334.6
Tanner MordecaiSMU0.63014.0321.5
Baker MayfieldOklahoma0.56114.1323.7
J.T. BarrettOhio State0.59314.1341.6

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.7100.71Wk 2 vs Vanderbilt: +0.60 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Liberty: +0.35 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Clemson: +0.61 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Florida State: +0.28 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Army: +0.49 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Boston College: +0.71 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Louisville: -0.19 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs NC State: +0.41 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs North Carolina: +0.51 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Syracuse: +0.25 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Duke: +0.47 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs Missouri: +0.34 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
2@VanderbiltW45-25-4.718/273004071.51200.60
3vsLibertyW37-36-1.526/443253258.31100.35
4vsClemsonL45-5117.620/293376094.81000.61
5@Florida StateW31-2113.222/342342086.0-500.28
6vsArmyW45-10-1.513/192461053.13600.49
8vsBoston CollegeW43-15-14.925/403135178.7710.71
9@LouisvilleL21-489.020/352711346.9-240-0.19
10@NC StateL21-306.829/483972379.5-1400.41
11vsNorth CarolinaL34-367.818/313204150.01200.51
12vsSyracuseW45-352.530/433314074.44400.25
13@DukeL31-345.026/423473180.23300.47
1vsMissouriW27-178.123/3728031800.34

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
58.3%
Passing plays
97.1%
Rushing plays
15.7%
Standard downs
50.2%
Passing downs
77.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.26
Passing downs
0.57
Pass / Rush EPA
0.44 / 0.02

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.100−0.30202120222023
EPA per play · 2020 — 2023 · 47 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2020Wake Forest
5.5
144.0
2021Wake Forest
11.8
359.6
2022Wake Forest
12.8
319.9
2023Notre Dame
8.9
208.6

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.