Skip to content
Nicholas Singleton
Nicholas Singleton

#10Nicholas Singleton

Nicholas Singleton is a 2-year Pass-Catching Back for Penn State. Nicholas's 2025 season ranks in the 68th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 143 plays — a average rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Nicholas Singleton's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
549 Rush yards13 Rush TD123 Carries4.5 Yards/carry
Receiving
24 Receptions219 Rec yards1 Rec TD9.1 Yards/rec
Returns
7 Kick returns145 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency68
  • Volume59
  • Explosiveness30
  • Consistency56
  • Receiving88
Player type
Pass-Catching Back

Third-down weapon out of the backfield. Routes, hands, and separation in coverage define this role as much as rushing.

3rd-down backReceiving threatPass protection
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)68th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency56th %ile · average
Key findings
  • 5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.08 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 0.78 EPA/play in Wk 14 vs Rutgers (SP+ 1).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Travis EtienneClemson0.4704.7100.1
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.7800.78Wk 1 vs Nevada: +0.17 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Florida International: +0.56 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Villanova: +0.25 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs Oregon: +0.13 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs UCLA: +0.02 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Northwestern: +0.10 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Iowa: -0.46 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Ohio State: +0.48 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Indiana: +0.41 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Michigan State: -0.25 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Nebraska: +0.76 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Rutgers: +0.78 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsNevadaW46-11-13.48192.4243700.17
2vsFlorida InternationalW34-0-10.513765.810.56
3vsVillanovaW52-620844.221700.25
5vsOregonL24-3025.911211.9032900.13
6@UCLAL37-42-8.711393.5021600.02
7vsNorthwesternL21-225.87202.912600.10
8@IowaL24-2519.76152.50100-0.46
10@Ohio StateL14-3830.16183.0132800.48
11vsIndianaL24-2732.410717.1232210.41
12@Michigan StateW28-10-3.415563.70-0.25
13vsNebraskaW37-106.27446.3235100.76
14@RutgersW40-361.09869.6222300.78

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
20.8%
Passing plays
10.1%
Rushing plays
29.4%
Standard downs
21.3%
Passing downs
19.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.17
Passing downs
0.44
Pass / Rush EPA
0.28 / 0.23

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.090−0.462024
EPA per play · 2022 — 2024 · 28 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2022Penn State
3.3
61.6
2024Penn State
3.0
72.2

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.