Skip to content
Marcus Mariota

#8Marcus Mariota

QB·Oregon·2014201319.2 pts line value1st Round

Marcus Mariota is a 2-year Dual-Threat QB for Oregon. Marcus's 2014 season ranks in the 98th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 561 plays — a elite rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Marcus Mariota's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2014 Production

Passing
304/445 Comp/Att4454 Pass yards42 Pass TD4 INT68.3% Comp %
Rushing
770 Rush yards15 Rush TD135 Carries5.7 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2014 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency98
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency92
  • Clutch70
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)98th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency92th %ile · elite
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among QBs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 14 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.11 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.90 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs South Dakota.

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Brandon DoughtyWestern Kentucky0.69018.2394.0
Mason RudolphOklahoma State0.65518.4387.6
Jalen HurtsOklahoma0.70817.3394.2
Chad KellyOle Miss0.63517.5370.2
Brandon DoughtyWestern Kentucky0.62017.8379.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.9000.90Wk 1 vs South Dakota: +0.90 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Michigan State: +0.55 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Wyoming: +0.83 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Washington State: +0.81 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Arizona: +0.52 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs UCLA: +0.56 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Washington: +0.55 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs California: +0.57 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Stanford: +0.75 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Utah: +0.46 EPA/play11Wk 13 vs Colorado: +0.65 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Oregon State: +0.86 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs Arizona: +0.32 EPA/play15Wk 1 vs Ohio State: +0.46 EPA/play1Wk 1 vs Florida State: +0.46 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsSouth DakotaW62-1314/202673098.24310.90
2vsMichigan StateW46-2724.117/283183082.24200.55
3vsWyomingW48-14-14.019/232212097.97120.83
4@Washington StateW38-31-1.721/253295095.75800.81
6vsArizonaL24-317.620/322762053.3100.52
7@UCLAW42-3017.717/272102087.77520.56
8vsWashingtonW45-207.824/333362088.3-100.55
9@CaliforniaW59-41-0.618/303265192.23600.57
10vsStanfordW45-1621.419/302582195.18520.75
11@UtahW51-278.817/292393080.811410.46
13vsColoradoW44-10-5.024/323233097.47310.65
14@Oregon StateW47-193.219/253674097.03920.86
15vsArizonaW51-137.625/383132066.73330.32
1vsOhio StateL20-4225.824/373332159.43900.46
1vsFlorida StateW59-2028.526/363382173.46210.46

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
51.0%
Passing plays
94.2%
Rushing plays
17.0%
Standard downs
47.2%
Passing downs
61.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.54
Passing downs
0.69
Pass / Rush EPA
0.54 / 0.83

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.030−0.532014
EPA per play · 2013 — 2014 · 28 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2013Oregon
3.4
106.3
2014Oregon
19.2
434.8

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.