Skip to content
Brandon Doughty

#12Brandon Doughty

QB·Western Kentucky·20152014201317.8 pts line value1st Round

Brandon Doughty is a 3-year Clutch Passer for Western Kentucky. Brandon's 2014 season ranks in the 85th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 559 plays — a above-average rate for the QB. Brandon's production has improved each season, a positive development trajectory.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Brandon Doughty's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2014 Production

Passing
375/552 Comp/Att4830 Pass yards49 Pass TD10 INT67.9% Comp %
Rushing
-52 Rush yards2 Rush TD39 Carries-1.3 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2014 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency85
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat26
  • Consistency80
  • Clutch74
Player type
Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)85th %ile · above avg
Game-to-game consistency80th %ile · above avg
Career trajectory:↑ Rising
Key findings
  • Above-average efficiency for the QB position (85th percentile).
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • Career trajectory is upward — WEPA value has improved season over season.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 9 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.10 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 0.90 EPA/play in Wk 9 vs Old Dominion (SP+ -13).

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Chad KellyOle Miss0.63517.5370.2
Mason RudolphOklahoma State0.65518.4387.6
Jalen HurtsOklahoma0.70817.3394.2
Justin FieldsOhio State0.71317.0385.1
Kyle TraskFlorida0.64816.3347.5

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.9000.90Wk 1 vs Bowling Green: +0.80 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Illinois: -0.04 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Middle Tennessee: +0.49 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs Navy: +0.32 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs UAB: +0.41 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Florida Atlantic: +0.24 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Old Dominion: +0.90 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Louisiana Tech: -0.20 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs UTEP: +0.55 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Army: +0.47 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs UTSA: +0.69 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Marshall: +0.62 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Central Michigan: +0.70 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsBowling GreenW59-31-5.446/565696093.5-200.80
2@IllinoisL34-420.428/482972138.0-10-0.04
3@Middle TennesseeL47-50-8.743/665934189.1-1400.49
5@NavyW36-273.438/543872174.6310.32
6vsUABL39-42-4.225/373192074.41600.41
8@Florida AtlanticL38-45-10.428/443353160.2-1200.24
9vsOld DominionW66-51-12.723/263715098.9-200.90
10@Louisiana TechL10-59-1.714/35134144.5-230-0.20
11vsUTEPW35-27-12.023/343243075.5-1200.55
12vsArmyW52-24-16.916/251783085.6610.47
13vsUTSAW45-7-3.426/353465093.7000.69
14@MarshallW67-6616.834/504918286.6-1500.62
1vsCentral MichiganW49-48-5.231/424865098.7400.70

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
59.0%
Passing plays
98.9%
Rushing plays
6.5%
Standard downs
51.0%
Passing downs
78.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.42
Passing downs
0.59
Pass / Rush EPA
0.50 / 0.03

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.010−0.3120142015
EPA per play · 2013 — 2015 · 38 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2013Western Kentucky
2.5
83.8
2014Western Kentucky
17.8
379.4
2015Western Kentucky
18.2
394.0

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.