Skip to content
Lamar Jackson

#8Lamar Jackson

QB·Louisville·2017201616.8 pts line value1st Round

Lamar Jackson is a 2-year Dual-Threat QB for Louisville. Lamar's 2017 season ranks in the 75th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 617 plays — a above-average rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Lamar Jackson's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2017 Production

Passing
254/430 Comp/Att3660 Pass yards27 Pass TD10 INT59.1% Comp %
Rushing
1601 Rush yards18 Rush TD232 Carries6.9 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2017 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency75
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency88
  • Clutch80
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)75th %ile · above avg
Game-to-game consistency88th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Above-average efficiency for the QB position (75th percentile).
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 7 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.81 EPA/play in Wk 5 vs Murray State.

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Brandon DoughtyWestern Kentucky0.62017.8379.4
Chad KellyOle Miss0.63517.5370.2
Dwayne HaskinsOhio State0.64317.5419.0
Caleb WilliamsUSC0.62017.0415.9
Jared GoffCalifornia0.61015.7341.0

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.8100.81Wk 1 vs Purdue: +0.39 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs North Carolina: +0.58 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Clemson: +0.12 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Kent State: +0.67 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Murray State: +0.81 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs NC State: +0.31 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Boston College: +0.42 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Florida State: +0.37 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Wake Forest: +0.34 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Virginia: +0.54 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Syracuse: +0.70 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Kentucky: +0.60 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs Mississippi State: +0.28 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsPurdueW35-285.830/463782062.410700.39
2@North CarolinaW47-354.325/393933095.513230.58
3vsClemsonL21-4726.421/423173127.26400.12
4vsKent StateW42-3-20.218/222992278.73410.67
5vsMurray StateW55-1018/262493098.710010.81
6@NC StateL25-3912.926/473541164.67320.31
7vsBoston CollegeL42-454.619/393322181.818030.42
8@Florida StateW31-2822.813/211561085.617810.37
9@Wake ForestL32-4210.527/443301163.416130.34
11vsVirginiaW38-210.815/261953094.614710.54
12vsSyracuseW56-104.014/262702092.511120.70
13@KentuckyW44-172.715/212162070.915600.60
1vsMississippi StateL27-3116.013/311712447.415810.28

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
67.5%
Passing plays
92.2%
Rushing plays
44.3%
Standard downs
64.2%
Passing downs
74.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.36
Passing downs
0.56
Pass / Rush EPA
0.36 / 0.57

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.100−0.352017
EPA per play · 2016 — 2017 · 26 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2016Louisville
16.1
387.6
2017Louisville
16.8
384.9

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.