Skip to content
Kaytron Allen

#13Kaytron Allen

RB·Penn State·202520222.7 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Kaytron Allen is a 2-year Explosive Back for Penn State. Kaytron's 2022 season ranks in the 40th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 187 plays — a developing rate for the RB. A four-star recruit in the class of 2022, Kaytron has shown flashes of the talent that made him a coveted recruit.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Kaytron Allen's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

Recruiting Profile· Class of 2022

4-Star · High major target
Stars
247 composite
0.9385
National rank
#155
High school
IMG Academy
Hometown
Bradenton, FL

Recruiting data from CFBD/247Sports composite. Sourced from the player's signing-class team — transfers show original school's class.

2022 Production

Rushing
867 Rush yards10 Rush TD167 Carries5.2 Yards/carry
Receiving
20 Receptions188 Rec yards1 Rec TD9.4 Yards/rec
Returns
2 Kick returns37 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2022 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency40
  • Volume60
  • Explosiveness44
  • Consistency80
  • Receiving49
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)40th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency80th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.55 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs Auburn (SP+ 5).

NIL Market Tier· 2022

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Travis EtienneClemson0.4704.7100.1
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.4105.298.4
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
James FlandersTulsa0.3904.9103.7

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.5500.55Wk 1 vs Purdue: +0.21 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Ohio: +0.40 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Auburn: +0.55 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Central Michigan: +0.37 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Northwestern: +0.01 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Michigan: +0.17 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Minnesota: +0.28 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Ohio State: +0.47 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Indiana: +0.39 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Maryland: +0.10 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Rutgers: +0.32 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Michigan State: +0.02 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs Utah: +0.06 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1@PurdueW35-317.78313.901900.21
2vsOhioW46-10-4.66233.8012200.40
3@AuburnW41-125.19525.820.55
4vsCentral MichiganW33-14-14.0131118.511700.37
5vsNorthwesternW17-7-13.421864.100.01
7@MichiganL17-4132.06162.711100.17
8vsMinnesotaW45-1716.015775.1031300.28
9vsOhio StateL31-4431.112766.3121310.47
10@IndianaW45-14-7.118864.8327200.39
11vsMarylandW30-011.216734.601100.10
12@RutgersW55-10-9.11111710.6121000.32
13vsMichigan StateW35-161.221823.9032400.02
1vsUtahW35-2119.211373.4131600.06

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
21.1%
Passing plays
5.7%
Rushing plays
35.6%
Standard downs
23.6%
Passing downs
15.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.17
Passing downs
0.50
Pass / Rush EPA
0.28 / 0.23

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.930−0.152025
EPA per play · 2022 — 2025 · 25 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2022Penn State
2.7
55.2
2025Penn State
2.8
48.2

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.