Skip to content
Jhurell Pressley
Jhurell Pressley

#6Jhurell Pressley

RB·New Mexico·20144.9 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Jhurell Pressley is a Explosive Back for New Mexico. Jhurell's 2014 season ranks in the 95th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 113 plays — a elite rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jhurell Pressley's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2014 Production

Rushing
1083 Rush yards12 Rush TD114 Carries9.5 Yards/carry
Receiving
7 Receptions46 Rec yards0 Rec TD6.6 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2014 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency95
  • Volume48
  • Explosiveness100
  • Consistency61
  • Receiving69
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)95th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency61th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among RBs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • 5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Peak game: 1.73 EPA/play in Wk 11 vs Boise State (SP+ 12).

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Devon JohnsonMarshall0.5206.0108.2
Clyde Edwards-HelaireLSU0.4905.0105.8
Travis EtienneClemson0.4704.7100.1
Travis EtienneClemson0.6206.8132.7
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.4505.8102.6

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.7301.73Wk 1 vs UTEP: +0.24 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Arizona State: +0.10 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs New Mexico State: +1.28 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Fresno State: +0.39 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs UTSA: +0.61 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs San Diego State: +0.16 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Air Force: +0.67 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs UNLV: +0.38 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Boise State: +1.73 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Utah State: -0.79 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Colorado State: +0.58 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Wyoming: +0.20 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsUTEPL24-31-12.09849.300.24
2vsArizona StateL23-5813.512534.410.10
4@New Mexico StateW38-35-23.367813.011.28
5vsFresno StateL24-35-6.914705.0113200.39
6@UTSAW21-9-3.4510220.411-200.61
7vsSan Diego StateL14-241.011454.1032100.16
8@Air ForceL31-35-1.41114813.520-1800.67
10@UNLVW31-28-17.6201386.930.38
11vsBoise StateL49-6011.6715422.021.73
12@Utah StateL21-286.0111.00-0.79
13@Colorado StateL20-584.5710915.600.58
14vsWyomingW36-30-14.0111019.2121300.20

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
16.7%
Passing plays
6.3%
Rushing plays
19.7%
Standard downs
19.0%
Passing downs
11.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.48
Passing downs
0.44
Pass / Rush EPA
0.07 / 0.51

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.990−1.04
EPA per play · 2014 · 12 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.