Skip to content
Colin Reardon

#10Colin Reardon

WR·Kent State·201420130.3 pts line value1st Round

Colin Reardon is a 2-year Workhorse Receiver WR for Kent State. Colin's 2013 season ranks in the 71th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 358 plays — a average rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Colin Reardon's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2013 Production

Passing
186/316 Comp/Att1957 Pass yards12 Pass TD9 INT58.9% Comp %
Rushing
336 Rush yards2 Rush TD88 Carries3.8 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2013 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency71
  • Volume100
  • Explosiveness36
  • Consistency33
  • Pass-Down99
Player type
Workhorse Receiver WR

The primary target in the offense — used across all situations and down-types at an elite volume.

Top target shareAll-down utilityOffense runs through this player
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)71th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency33th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used WRs by play share.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.09 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 0.45 EPA/play in Wk 7 vs Ball State (SP+ 8).

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
D.J. FosterArizona State0.2001.034.8
Shai WertsGeorgia Southern0.1500.024.2
Zach AbeyNavy0.3702.9101.8
Shai WertsGeorgia Southern0.2101.932.1

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · EPA per play, week by week

+0.4500.45Wk 1 vs Liberty: +0.18 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Bowling Green: +0.08 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs LSU: +0.39 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Penn State: -0.18 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Western Michigan: +0.11 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Northern Illinois: -0.32 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Ball State: +0.45 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs Buffalo: +0.10 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Akron: -0.28 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Miami (OH): +0.32 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Ohio: +0.44 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+EPA/playPassRush
1vsLibertyW17-100.180.29-0.11
2vsBowling GreenL22-419.80.080.030.20
3@LSUL13-4528.70.390.410.29
4@Penn StateL0-348.9-0.18-0.10-0.68
5@Western MichiganW32-14-25.50.110.090.17
6vsNorthern IllinoisL24-386.3-0.32-0.32-0.31
7@Ball StateL24-277.50.450.340.71
9vsBuffaloL21-41-9.00.100.14-0.03
10@AkronL7-16-15.3-0.28-0.28-0.30
12vsMiami (OH)W24-6-29.00.320.410.01
13@OhioW44-13-11.40.440.430.47

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
52.2%
Passing plays
90.4%
Rushing plays
20.4%
Standard downs
44.2%
Passing downs
68.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.02
Passing downs
0.28
Pass / Rush EPA
0.11 / 0.09

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.740−0.412014
EPA per play · 2013 — 2014 · 22 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2013Kent State
0.3
4.6
2014Kent State
0.3
10.4

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.