Skip to content
Chuba Hubbard

#30Chuba Hubbard

RB·Oklahoma State·202020191.6 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Chuba Hubbard is a 2-year Featured Back for Oklahoma State. Chuba's 2020 season ranks in the 23th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 139 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Chuba Hubbard's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2020 Production

Rushing
623 Rush yards5 Rush TD132 Carries4.7 Yards/carry
Receiving
8 Receptions52 Rec yards1 Rec TD6.5 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2020 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency23
  • Volume78
  • Explosiveness34
  • Consistency64
  • Receiving30
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)23th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency64th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.16 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.67 EPA/play in Wk 5 vs Kansas (SP+ -16).

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Travis EtienneClemson0.4704.7100.1
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.4105.298.4
Clyde Edwards-HelaireLSU0.4905.0105.8
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.6700.67Wk 3 vs Tulsa: -0.10 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs West Virginia: +0.26 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Kansas: +0.67 EPA/play5Wk 8 vs Iowa State: +0.20 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Texas: -0.04 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Kansas State: +0.13 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Oklahoma: +0.25 EPA/play12
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
3vsTulsaW16-75.627933.412-70-0.10
4vsWest VirginiaW27-138.5221014.610.26
5@KansasW47-7-16.3201457.320.67
8vsIowa StateW24-2113.3251405.6112100.20
9vsTexasL34-419.724692.904341-0.04
10@Kansas StateW20-182.06315.201400.13
12@OklahomaL13-4117.88445.500.25

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
27.3%
Passing plays
4.5%
Rushing plays
44.3%
Standard downs
30.4%
Passing downs
20.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.09
Passing downs
0.33
Pass / Rush EPA
0.36 / 0.14

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.750−0.182020
EPA per play · 2019 — 2020 · 20 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2019Oklahoma State
8.2
154.4
2020Oklahoma State
1.6
40.3

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.