Skip to content
Bryce Petty

#14Bryce Petty

QB·Baylor·2014201312.6 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Bryce Petty is a 2-year Dual-Threat QB for Baylor. Bryce's 2014 season ranks in the 73th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 495 plays — a average rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Bryce Petty's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2014 Production

Passing
270/428 Comp/Att3855 Pass yards29 Pass TD7 INT63.1% Comp %
Rushing
101 Rush yards6 Rush TD84 Carries1.2 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2014 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency73
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat54
  • Consistency76
  • Clutch60
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)73th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency76th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.17 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 0.93 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs Buffalo (SP+ -8).

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0
Tanner MordecaiSMU0.63014.0321.5
Ryan HigginsLouisiana Tech0.58613.7334.6
Baker MayfieldOklahoma0.56114.1323.7
J.T. BarrettOhio State0.59314.1341.6

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.9300.93Wk 1 vs SMU: +0.42 EPA/play1Wk 3 vs Buffalo: +0.93 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs Iowa State: +0.17 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Texas: -0.24 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs TCU: +0.30 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs West Virginia: -0.02 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Kansas: +0.39 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Oklahoma: +0.37 EPA/play11Wk 13 vs Oklahoma State: +0.38 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Texas Tech: +0.43 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs Kansas State: +0.50 EPA/play15Wk 1 vs Michigan State: +0.52 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsSMUW45-0-21.213/231612084.12110.42
3@BuffaloW63-21-7.723/344164098.11100.93
5@Iowa StateW49-28-7.930/443361183.14720.17
6@TexasW28-79.07/22111205.570-0.24
7vsTCUW61-5823.328/555106261.92300.30
8@West VirginiaL27-418.416/362232024.9-90-0.02
10vsKansasW60-14-9.815/272773065.21100.39
11@OklahomaW48-1419.232/423871071.6-800.37
13vsOklahoma StateW49-288.618/292622271.02310.38
14vsTexas TechW48-464.918/252102078.1500.43
15vsKansas StateW38-2716.334/404121184.5610.50
1vsMichigan StateL41-4224.136/515503188.8-3610.52

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
47.5%
Passing plays
87.9%
Rushing plays
11.5%
Standard downs
44.2%
Passing downs
55.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.30
Passing downs
0.40
Pass / Rush EPA
0.35 / 0.17

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.040−0.362014
EPA per play · 2013 — 2014 · 25 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2013Baylor
3.3
108.4
2014Baylor
12.6
294.4

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.