Skip to content
Brock Purdy

#15Brock Purdy

QB·Iowa State·202020198.7 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Brock Purdy is a 2-year Dual-Threat QB for Iowa State. Brock's 2020 season ranks in the 57th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 434 plays — a average rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Brock Purdy's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2020 Production

Passing
243/364 Comp/Att2750 Pass yards19 Pass TD9 INT66.8% Comp %
Rushing
382 Rush yards5 Rush TD87 Carries4.4 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2020 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency57
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency77
  • Clutch39
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)57th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency77th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.22 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 1.20 EPA/play in Wk 14 vs West Virginia (SP+ 9).

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0
Tanner MordecaiSMU0.63014.0321.5

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.2001.20Wk 2 vs Louisiana: +0.05 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs TCU: +0.33 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Oklahoma: +0.65 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Texas Tech: +0.42 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Oklahoma State: +0.07 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Kansas: +0.29 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Baylor: +0.25 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Kansas State: +0.80 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Texas: +0.30 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs West Virginia: +1.20 EPA/play14Wk 16 vs Oklahoma: +0.23 EPA/play16Wk 1 vs Oregon: +0.36 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
2vsLouisianaL14-318.116/35145013500.05
4@TCUW37-341.618/2221110600.33
5vsOklahomaW37-3017.812/2425410-210.65
6vsTexas TechW31-15-4.232/43302204200.42
8@Oklahoma StateL21-2414.219/34162113810.07
9@KansasW52-22-16.323/34239212010.29
10vsBaylorW38-311.315/24164335500.25
12vsKansas StateW45-02.016/20236305900.80
13@TexasW23-209.725/36312101900.30
14vsWest VirginiaW42-68.520/23247303811.20
16vsOklahomaL21-2717.827/40322133300.23
1vsOregonW34-1718.120/29156103910.36

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
54.5%
Passing plays
97.7%
Rushing plays
16.8%
Standard downs
44.9%
Passing downs
80.0%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.37
Passing downs
0.37
Pass / Rush EPA
0.33 / 0.54

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.320−0.072020
EPA per play · 2019 — 2020 · 25 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2019Iowa State
10.0
282.8
2020Iowa State
8.7
239.1

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.