Skip to content
Will Rogers

#2Will Rogers

QB·Mississippi State·202220218.5 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Will Rogers is a 2-year Clutch Passer for Mississippi State. Will's 2021 season ranks in the 10th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 678 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Will Rogers's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2021 Production

Passing
505/683 Comp/Att4739 Pass yards36 Pass TD9 INT73.9% Comp %
Rushing
-97 Rush yards0 Rush TD62 Carries-1.6 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2021 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency10
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat0
  • Consistency78
  • Clutch100
Player type
Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)10th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency78th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 7 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.17 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 0.79 EPA/play in Wk 12 vs Tennessee State.

NIL Market Tier· 2021

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Jordan TravisFlorida State0.47610.1328.3
Sam HartmanWake Forest0.55611.8359.6
Kyle McCordSyracuse0.50912.1321.4
Casey ThompsonNebraska0.52812.6351.4
Trace McSorleyPenn State0.51312.7321.0

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.7900.79Wk 1 vs Louisiana Tech: +0.44 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs NC State: +0.41 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Memphis: +0.25 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs LSU: +0.23 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Texas A&M: +0.31 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Alabama: -0.16 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Vanderbilt: +0.52 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Kentucky: +0.66 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Arkansas: +0.47 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Auburn: +0.47 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Tennessee State: +0.79 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Ole Miss: +0.09 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs Texas Tech: +0.01 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsLouisiana TechW35-34-11.639/473703140.8-1800.44
2vsNC StateW24-1016.133/492942077.7-500.41
3@MemphisL29-311.050/674193064.7-600.25
4vsLSUL25-284.147/623713175.21800.23
5@Texas A&MW26-2221.146/594083093.1500.31
7vsAlabamaL9-4926.035/553000344.4-410-0.16
8@VanderbiltW45-6-19.441/573844269.4-1300.52
9vsKentuckyW31-1713.436/393441087.8-500.66
10@ArkansasL28-3113.836/484174187.3-200.47
11@AuburnW43-3411.044/554156090.7-700.47
12vsTennessee StateW55-1028/343915094.20.79
13vsOle MissL21-3114.838/583361054.3400.09
1vsTexas TechL7-349.832/532901134.6-2700.01

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
74.4%
Passing plays
94.7%
Rushing plays
12.6%
Standard downs
69.3%
Passing downs
87.0%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.20
Passing downs
0.53
Pass / Rush EPA
0.33 / -0.12

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.890−0.262022
EPA per play · 2021 — 2022 · 26 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2021Mississippi State
8.5
318.8
2022Mississippi State
7.4
260.0

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.