Skip to content
Ty Chandler

#19Ty Chandler

RB·North Carolina·20213.4 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Ty Chandler is a Explosive Back for North Carolina. Ty's 2021 season ranks in the 57th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 195 plays — a average rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Ty Chandler's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2021 Production

Rushing
1092 Rush yards13 Rush TD182 Carries6.0 Yards/carry
Receiving
15 Receptions216 Rec yards1 Rec TD14.4 Yards/rec
Returns
6 Kick returns70 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2021 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency57
  • Volume63
  • Explosiveness60
  • Consistency73
  • Receiving33
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)57th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency73th %ile · average
Key findings
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.16 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.74 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs Virginia (SP+ 7).

NIL Market Tier· 2021

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Travis EtienneClemson0.4704.7100.1
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.4105.298.4
Clyde Edwards-HelaireLSU0.4905.0105.8
Nick WilsonArizona0.4105.2102.5
James FlandersTulsa0.3904.9103.7

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.7400.74Wk 1 vs Virginia Tech: +0.33 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Georgia State: +0.37 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Virginia: +0.74 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Georgia Tech: -0.02 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Duke: +0.73 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Florida State: +0.20 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Miami: +0.31 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs Notre Dame: +0.27 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Wake Forest: +0.57 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Pittsburgh: -0.10 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Wofford: +0.41 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs NC State: +0.48 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs South Carolina: -0.21 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1@Virginia TechL10-172.410666.601900.33
2vsGeorgia StateW59-171.815583.9111500.37
3vsVirginiaW59-397.2201989.920.74
4vsGeorgia TechL22-45-6.717482.801120-0.02
5vsDukeW38-7-13.512534.4128710.73
6vsFlorida StateL25-357.614614.410.20
7vsMiamiW45-4210.8181045.8221700.31
9@Notre DameL34-4417.415835.5211800.27
10vsWake ForestW58-5510.1222139.7413000.57
11@PittsburghL23-3017.614423.003120-0.10
12vsWoffordW34-1410787.801800.41
13@NC StateL30-3416.16599.801700.48
1vsSouth CarolinaL21-383.99293.20110-0.21

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
22.2%
Passing plays
4.0%
Rushing plays
39.2%
Standard downs
26.5%
Passing downs
12.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.21
Passing downs
0.95
Pass / Rush EPA
1.11 / 0.26

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.840−0.31
EPA per play · 2021 · 13 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.