Skip to content
Terence Williams
Terence Williams

#22Terence Williams

RB·Baylor·20162.4 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Terence Williams is a Explosive Back for Baylor. Terence's 2016 season ranks in the 30th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 168 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Terence Williams's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2016 Production

Rushing
1048 Rush yards11 Rush TD185 Carries5.7 Yards/carry
Receiving
2 Receptions22 Rec yards0 Rec TD11.0 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2016 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency30
  • Volume52
  • Explosiveness54
  • Consistency69
  • Receiving9
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)30th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency69th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.11 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.65 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Northwestern State.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Travis EtienneClemson0.4704.7100.1
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.4105.298.4
Clyde Edwards-HelaireLSU0.4905.0105.8
James FlandersTulsa0.3904.9103.7

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.6500.65Wk 1 vs Northwestern State: +0.65 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs SMU: +0.29 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Rice: +0.16 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Oklahoma State: -0.21 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Iowa State: +0.46 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Kansas: +0.39 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs Texas: +0.46 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs TCU: +0.10 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Oklahoma: -0.16 EPA/play11Wk 13 vs Texas Tech: +0.21 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs West Virginia: +0.42 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Boise State: +0.07 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsNorthwestern StateW55-711726.520.65
2vsSMUW40-13-10.819814.300.29
3@RiceW38-10-16.512796.610.16
4vsOklahoma StateW35-2416.413524.011230-0.21
5@Iowa StateW45-420.7161267.921-100.46
7vsKansasW49-7-15.98334.110.39
9@TexasL34-3510.6241807.510.46
10vsTCUL22-6211.018683.800.10
11@OklahomaL24-4526.15173.40-0.16
13vsTexas TechL35-543.7231476.420.21
14@West VirginiaL21-2411.311908.210.42
1vsBoise StateW31-1211.5251034.100.07

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
18.1%
Passing plays
0.9%
Rushing plays
31.8%
Standard downs
21.1%
Passing downs
11.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.20
Passing downs
0.42
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.03 / 0.25

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.740−0.29
EPA per play · 2016 · 12 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.