Skip to content
Sam Howell

#7Sam Howell

QB·North Carolina·2021202020197.8 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Sam Howell is a 3-year Dual-Threat QB for North Carolina. Sam's 2021 season ranks in the 23th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 509 plays — a developing rate for the QB. Production has trended downward season-over-season on adjusted value metrics.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Sam Howell's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

Recruiting Profile· Class of 2019

4-Star · High major target
Stars
247 composite
0.9582
National rank
#93
High school
Sun Valley
Hometown
Monroe, NC

Recruiting data from CFBD/247Sports composite. Sourced from the player's signing-class team — transfers show original school's class.

2021 Production

Passing
217/347 Comp/Att3056 Pass yards24 Pass TD9 INT62.5% Comp %
Rushing
828 Rush yards11 Rush TD183 Carries4.5 Yards/carry
Punting
1 Punts35 Punt yards35.0 Yards/punt35 Long1 Inside 20

Performance Analysis · 2021 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency23
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency80
  • Clutch100
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)23th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency80th %ile · above avg
Career trajectory:↓ Declining
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • Production has slipped season-over-season on adjusted value metrics.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.11 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.86 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs Virginia (SP+ 7).

NIL Market Tier· 2021

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0
Jordan TravisFlorida State0.47610.1328.3
Kyle McCordSyracuse0.50912.1321.4
Sam HartmanWake Forest0.55611.8359.6
Trace McSorleyPenn State0.51312.7321.0

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.8600.86Wk 1 vs Virginia Tech: +0.02 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Georgia State: +0.83 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Virginia: +0.86 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Georgia Tech: +0.28 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Duke: +0.34 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Florida State: +0.27 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Miami: +0.34 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs Notre Dame: +0.51 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Wake Forest: +0.52 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Pittsburgh: +0.25 EPA/play11Wk 13 vs NC State: +0.11 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs South Carolina: +0.20 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1@Virginia TechL10-172.417/322081331.23500.02
2vsGeorgia StateW59-171.821/293523096.210420.83
3vsVirginiaW59-397.214/213075193.711200.86
4vsGeorgia TechL22-45-6.725/393062030.6810.28
5vsDukeW38-7-13.518/323213055.92900.34
6vsFlorida StateL25-357.617/322032174.210800.27
7vsMiamiW45-4210.817/261542184.09820.34
9@Notre DameL34-4417.424/313411193.610110.51
10vsWake ForestW58-5510.116/262161089.210420.52
11@PittsburghL23-3017.622/332962168.42810.25
13@NC StateL30-3416.114/261471176.79820.11
1vsSouth CarolinaL21-383.912/202051057.7300.20

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
63.5%
Passing plays
98.0%
Rushing plays
31.8%
Standard downs
55.6%
Passing downs
81.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.23
Passing downs
0.56
Pass / Rush EPA
0.26 / 0.63

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.150−0.0820202021
EPA per play · 2019 — 2021 · 37 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2019North Carolina
12.9
316.3
2020North Carolina
11.3
263.9
2021North Carolina
7.8
270.4

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.