Skip to content
Royce Freeman

#21Royce Freeman

RB·Oregon·2017201520142.5 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Royce Freeman is a 3-year Featured Back for Oregon. Royce's 2017 season ranks in the 25th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 242 plays — a developing rate for the RB. Production has trended downward season-over-season on adjusted value metrics.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Royce Freeman's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

Recruiting Profile· Class of 2014

4-Star · High major target
Stars
247 composite
0.9831
National rank
#34
High school
Imperial
Hometown
Imperial, CA

Recruiting data from CFBD/247Sports composite. Sourced from the player's signing-class team — transfers show original school's class.

2017 Production

Rushing
1475 Rush yards16 Rush TD244 Carries6.0 Yards/carry
Receiving
14 Receptions164 Rec yards0 Rec TD11.7 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2017 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency25
  • Volume84
  • Explosiveness60
  • Consistency80
  • Receiving35
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)25th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency80th %ile · above avg
Career trajectory:↓ Declining
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • Production has slipped season-over-season on adjusted value metrics.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.09 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 0.63 EPA/play in Wk 12 vs Arizona (SP+ 4).

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Breece HallIowa State0.3404.5102.3
Hassan HaskinsMichigan0.3804.8106.4
James FlandersTulsa0.3904.9103.7

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.6300.63Wk 1 vs Southern Utah: +0.35 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Nebraska: +0.18 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Wyoming: +0.37 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Arizona State: +0.06 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs California: +0.32 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Washington State: +0.00 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Stanford: +0.22 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs UCLA: +0.21 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Utah: +0.23 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Washington: +0.08 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Arizona: +0.63 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Oregon State: +0.46 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsSouthern UtahW77-21231506.5445000.35
2vsNebraskaW42-352.5291535.321900.18
3@WyomingW49-13-2.5301575.2315000.37
4@Arizona StateL35-371.015815.4131900.06
5vsCaliforniaW45-24-1.06518.500.32
6vsWashington StateL10-338.612625.201800.00
7@StanfordL7-4915.8181437.901800.22
8@UCLAL14-314.9291605.500.21
9vsUtahW41-2012.0201396.900.23
10@WashingtonL3-3822.1241225.101000.08
12vsArizonaW48-283.7191357.140.63
13vsOregon StateW69-10-12.6191226.4222000.46

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
29.5%
Passing plays
5.7%
Rushing plays
42.1%
Standard downs
34.8%
Passing downs
16.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.24
Passing downs
0.28
Pass / Rush EPA
0.62 / 0.22

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.980−0.4320152017
EPA per play · 2014 — 2017 · 40 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2014Oregon
4.3
95.5
2015Oregon
5.1
99.0
2017Oregon
2.5
62.9

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.