Skip to content
Royce Freeman

#21Royce Freeman

RB·Oregon·2017201520144.3 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Royce Freeman is a 3-year Explosive Back for Oregon. Royce's 2014 season ranks in the 57th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 251 plays — a average rate for the RB. Production has trended downward season-over-season on adjusted value metrics.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Royce Freeman's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

Recruiting Profile· Class of 2014

4-Star · High major target
Stars
247 composite
0.9831
National rank
#34
High school
Imperial
Hometown
Imperial, CA

Recruiting data from CFBD/247Sports composite. Sourced from the player's signing-class team — transfers show original school's class.

2014 Production

Rushing
1365 Rush yards18 Rush TD252 Carries5.4 Yards/carry
Receiving
16 Receptions158 Rec yards1 Rec TD9.9 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2014 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency57
  • Volume69
  • Explosiveness48
  • Consistency79
  • Receiving29
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)57th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency79th %ile · above avg
Career trajectory:↓ Declining
Key findings
  • Production has slipped season-over-season on adjusted value metrics.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.09 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.74 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs South Dakota.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
James FlandersTulsa0.3904.9103.7
Hassan HaskinsMichigan0.3804.8106.4
Nick WilsonArizona0.4105.2102.5
Ameer AbdullahNebraska0.3805.399.6
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.4105.298.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.7400.74Wk 1 vs South Dakota: +0.74 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Michigan State: +0.63 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Wyoming: +0.12 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Washington State: -0.05 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Arizona: +0.08 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs UCLA: +0.57 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Washington: +0.41 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs California: +0.25 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Stanford: +0.22 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Utah: +0.12 EPA/play11Wk 13 vs Colorado: +0.19 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Oregon State: +0.48 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs Arizona: +0.27 EPA/play15Wk 1 vs Ohio State: +0.29 EPA/play1Wk 1 vs Florida State: +0.29 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsSouth DakotaW62-1310757.5211100.74
2vsMichigan StateW46-2724.113896.8222200.63
3vsWyomingW48-14-14.05224.410.12
4@Washington StateW38-31-1.720753.80-0.05
6vsArizonaL24-317.619854.500.08
7@UCLAW42-3017.7181216.720.57
8vsWashingtonW45-207.8291695.842400.41
9@CaliforniaW59-41-0.6221125.121800.25
10vsStanfordW45-1621.419985.2035200.22
11@UtahW51-278.815996.611600.12
13vsColoradoW44-10-5.0171056.221300.19
14@Oregon StateW47-193.2221356.1021910.48
15vsArizonaW51-137.6211145.4011400.27
1vsOhio StateL20-4225.810222.200.29
1vsFlorida StateW59-2028.512443.7221900.29

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
24.0%
Passing plays
3.8%
Rushing plays
41.3%
Standard downs
26.8%
Passing downs
16.7%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.27
Passing downs
0.36
Pass / Rush EPA
0.85 / 0.25

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.980−0.4320152017
EPA per play · 2014 — 2017 · 40 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2014Oregon
4.3
95.5
2015Oregon
5.1
99.0
2017Oregon
2.5
62.9

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.