Skip to content
Ronnie Rivers

#20Ronnie Rivers

RB·Fresno State·20182.5 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Ronnie Rivers is a Explosive Back for Fresno State. Ronnie's 2018 season ranks in the 63th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 154 plays — a average rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Ronnie Rivers's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2018 Production

Rushing
743 Rush yards10 Rush TD132 Carries5.6 Yards/carry
Receiving
26 Receptions311 Rec yards3 Rec TD12.0 Yards/rec
Returns
14 Punt returns138 PR yards0 PR TD

Performance Analysis · 2018 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency63
  • Volume63
  • Explosiveness52
  • Consistency79
  • Receiving69
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)63th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency79th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 7 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.36 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.79 EPA/play in Wk 9 vs Hawai'i (SP+ -10).

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Travis EtienneClemson0.4704.7100.1
Clyde Edwards-HelaireLSU0.4905.0105.8
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.4105.298.4
Nick WilsonArizona0.4105.2102.5
James FlandersTulsa0.3904.9103.7

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.7900.79Wk 5 vs Toledo: +0.51 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Nevada: +0.77 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Wyoming: +0.45 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs New Mexico: +0.69 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Hawai'i: +0.79 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs UNLV: -0.02 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Boise State: +0.50 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs San Diego State: +0.08 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs San José State: +0.35 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Boise State: -0.06 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Arizona State: +0.50 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
5vsToledoW49-272.022512.500.51
6@NevadaW21-3-0.55122.4111910.77
7vsWyomingW27-31.94225.5035300.45
8@New MexicoW38-7-9.511484.4246910.69
9vsHawai'iW50-20-10.41112511.411900.79
10@UNLVW48-3-11.112332.811170-0.02
11@Boise StateL17-2412.27334.7176000.50
12vsSan Diego StateW23-146.022783.511600.08
13vsSan José StateW31-13-17.117925.4034110.35
14@Boise StateW19-1612.217633.71140-0.06
1vsArizona StateW31-205.0242128.8243300.50

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
21.9%
Passing plays
8.3%
Rushing plays
35.3%
Standard downs
25.8%
Passing downs
11.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.29
Passing downs
0.85
Pass / Rush EPA
0.79 / 0.27

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.880−0.14
EPA per play · 2018 · 11 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.