Skip to content
Rocco Becht

#3Rocco Becht

QB·Iowa State·2024202310.4 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Rocco Becht is a 2-year Volume Passer for Iowa State. Rocco's 2023 season ranks in the 68th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 392 plays — a average rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Rocco Becht's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Passing
231/367 Comp/Att3120 Pass yards23 Pass TD8 INT62.9% Comp %
Rushing
63 Rush yards3 Rush TD62 Carries1.0 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency68
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat26
  • Consistency78
  • Clutch36
Player type
Volume Passer

High-rep offense that leans on this QB's arm — value comes through cumulative production across a high number of plays.

High play countFranchise-volume role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)68th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency78th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 8 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.17 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 1.56 EPA/play in Wk 13 vs Kansas State (SP+ 16).

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0
Tanner MordecaiSMU0.63014.0321.5
Kaidon SalterLiberty0.71114.7345.6
Malik CunninghamLouisville0.68114.7341.6
Blake SimsAlabama0.69615.4329.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.5601.56Wk 1 vs Northern Iowa: +0.68 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Iowa: +0.19 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Ohio: +0.58 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Oklahoma State: +0.52 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Oklahoma: +0.62 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs TCU: +0.20 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Cincinnati: +0.36 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs Baylor: +0.44 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Kansas: -0.06 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs BYU: +0.70 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Texas: +0.52 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Kansas State: +1.56 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsNorthern IowaW30-910/131132063.41010.68
2vsIowaL13-205.823/442031147.0400.19
3@OhioL7-10-1.617/242331261.03100.58
4vsOklahoma StateW34-276.727/383483085.9000.52
5@OklahomaL20-5015.015/331882253.01300.62
6vsTCUW27-147.916/281381052.8500.20
7@CincinnatiW30-10-6.815/252412064.51210.36
9@BaylorW30-18-8.319/312381162.8200.44
10vsKansasL21-289.920/262160125.0-51-0.06
11@BYUW45-13-3.315/232032088.7900.70
12vsTexasL16-2623.224/323232186.0-1400.52
13@Kansas StateW42-3516.28/122303098.41.56
20vsMemphisL26-363.522/384463078.9-40

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
52.8%
Passing plays
91.1%
Rushing plays
13.4%
Standard downs
44.3%
Passing downs
67.0%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.45
Passing downs
0.43
Pass / Rush EPA
0.49 / 0.03

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.720−0.222024
EPA per play · 2023 — 2024 · 27 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2023Iowa State
10.4
251.3
2024Iowa State
6.2
231.8

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.