Skip to content
Qadree Ollison

#37Qadree Ollison

RB·Pittsburgh·201820153.0 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Qadree Ollison is a 2-year Explosive Back for Pittsburgh. Qadree's 2018 season ranks in the 48th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 203 plays — a average rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Qadree Ollison's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2018 Production

Rushing
1213 Rush yards11 Rush TD194 Carries6.3 Yards/carry
Receiving
11 Receptions66 Rec yards0 Rec TD6.0 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2018 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency48
  • Volume67
  • Explosiveness66
  • Consistency58
  • Receiving38
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)48th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency58th %ile · average
Key findings
  • 5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.11 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 0.97 EPA/play in Wk 11 vs Virginia Tech (SP+ 4).

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Travis EtienneClemson0.4704.7100.1
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.4105.298.4
James FlandersTulsa0.3904.9103.7
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.9700.97Wk 1 vs UAlbany: +0.78 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Penn State: +0.01 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Georgia Tech: +0.13 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs North Carolina: +0.38 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs UCF: -0.07 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Syracuse: +0.43 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Notre Dame: -0.22 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs Duke: +0.47 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Virginia: +0.27 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Virginia Tech: +0.97 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Wake Forest: -0.17 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Miami: -0.11 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Clemson: +0.04 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Stanford: +0.76 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsUAlbanyW33-777310.400.78
2vsPenn StateL6-5119.0211195.712300.01
3vsGeorgia TechW24-190.317915.420.13
4@North CarolinaL35-38-2.512726.011800.38
5@UCFL14-4516.511494.501-30-0.07
6vsSyracuseW44-377.5241928.0121500.43
7@Notre DameL14-1920.716503.11250-0.22
9vsDukeW54-455.0181498.3122200.47
10@VirginiaW23-137.17243.400.27
11vsVirginia TechW52-223.91623514.730.97
12@Wake ForestW34-133.618522.90-0.17
13@MiamiL3-2412.79283.101160-0.11
14vsClemsonL10-4229.713564.310.04
1vsStanfordL13-1413.05234.600.76

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
23.4%
Passing plays
4.9%
Rushing plays
35.7%
Standard downs
28.1%
Passing downs
14.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.18
Passing downs
0.28
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.03 / 0.23

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.110−0.472018
EPA per play · 2015 — 2018 · 27 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2015Pittsburgh
1.9
48.7
2018Pittsburgh
3.0
68.9

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.