Skip to content
Patrick Taylor Jr.
Patrick Taylor Jr.

#6Patrick Taylor Jr.

RB·Memphis·201820173.0 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Patrick Taylor Jr. is a 2-year Explosive Back for Memphis. Patrick's 2018 season ranks in the 43th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 217 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Patrick Taylor Jr.'s projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2018 Production

Rushing
1112 Rush yards16 Rush TD205 Carries5.4 Yards/carry
Receiving
17 Receptions197 Rec yards2 Rec TD11.6 Yards/rec
Returns
1 Kick returns4 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2018 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency43
  • Volume63
  • Explosiveness48
  • Consistency48
  • Receiving49
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)43th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency48th %ile · average
Key findings
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.11 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.32 EPA/play in Wk 6 vs UConn (SP+ -26).

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
James FlandersTulsa0.3904.9103.7
Travis EtienneClemson0.4704.7100.1
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.4105.298.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.3201.32Wk 1 vs Mercer: +1.10 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Navy: -0.22 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Georgia State: +0.19 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs South Alabama: +0.26 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Tulane: -0.29 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs UConn: +1.32 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs UCF: -0.21 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Missouri: +0.08 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs East Carolina: +0.17 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Tulsa: +0.04 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs SMU: +0.38 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Houston: +0.43 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs UCF: +0.11 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Wake Forest: +0.22 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsMercerW66-149525.8117511.10
2@NavyL21-22-10.27284.00280-0.22
3vsGeorgia StateW59-22-20.45153.0023500.19
4vsSouth AlabamaW52-35-17.717754.420.26
5@TulaneL24-40-3.5263.00-0.29
6vsUConnW55-14-26.41116114.6311201.32
7vsUCFL30-3116.511474.30-0.21
8@MissouriL33-6520.8241054.420.08
10@East CarolinaW59-41-14.916593.711100.17
11vsTulsaW47-21-11.220964.810.04
12@SMUW28-18-5.4201115.6221900.38
13vsHoustonW52-312.3191286.7232300.43
14@UCFL41-5616.5151187.9142300.11
1vsWake ForestL34-373.6291113.811110.22

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
22.1%
Passing plays
6.0%
Rushing plays
34.5%
Standard downs
25.9%
Passing downs
13.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.23
Passing downs
0.46
Pass / Rush EPA
0.45 / 0.24

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.970−0.512018
EPA per play · 2017 — 2018 · 26 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2017Memphis
2.3
49.8
2018Memphis
3.0
71.4

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.