Skip to content
Michael Penix Jr.
Michael Penix Jr.

#9Michael Penix Jr.

QB·Washington·2023202212.3 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Michael Penix Jr. is a 2-year Clutch Passer for Washington. Michael's 2022 season ranks in the 63th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 563 plays — a average rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Michael Penix Jr.'s projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2022 Production

Passing
362/554 Comp/Att4641 Pass yards31 Pass TD8 INT65.3% Comp %
Rushing
92 Rush yards4 Rush TD35 Carries2.6 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2022 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency63
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat43
  • Consistency83
  • Clutch100
Player type
Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)63th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency83th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 7 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.11 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.85 EPA/play in Wk 7 vs Arizona (SP+ -3).

NIL Market Tier· 2022

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Ryan HigginsLouisiana Tech0.58613.7334.6
Trace McSorleyPenn State0.51312.7321.0
Kyle McCordSyracuse0.50912.1321.4
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0
Baker MayfieldOklahoma0.56114.1323.7

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.8500.85Wk 1 vs Kent State: +0.73 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Portland State: +0.78 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Michigan State: +0.41 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Stanford: +0.37 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs UCLA: +0.48 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Arizona State: +0.17 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Arizona: +0.85 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs California: +0.37 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Oregon State: +0.02 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Oregon: +0.74 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Colorado: +0.23 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Washington State: +0.71 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs Texas: +0.20 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsKent StateW45-20-13.126/393454083.92700.73
2vsPortland StateW52-620/273372187.30.78
3vsMichigan StateW39-281.224/403974091.9400.41
4vsStanfordW40-22-7.222/373092063.7-500.37
5@UCLAL32-4015.033/483454266.7-100.48
6@Arizona StateL38-45-4.133/533110155.2-610.17
7vsArizonaW49-39-3.236/445164090.71310.85
8@CaliforniaW28-21-3.036/513742076.7-1400.37
10vsOregon StateW24-2114.330/522981165.7800.02
11@OregonW37-3418.926/354082193.92000.74
12vsColoradoW54-7-20.419/312291059.2600.23
13@Washington StateW51-339.525/434853196.33420.71
1vsTexasW27-2023.132/5428721600.20

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
59.9%
Passing plays
96.0%
Rushing plays
7.7%
Standard downs
55.5%
Passing downs
71.0%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.32
Passing downs
0.68
Pass / Rush EPA
0.46 / 0.11

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.950−0.062023
EPA per play · 2022 — 2023 · 28 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2022Washington
12.3
315.3
2023Washington
14.2
382.2

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.