Skip to content
Mason Rudolph

#2Mason Rudolph

QB·Oklahoma State·2017201620158.2 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Mason Rudolph is a 3-year Clutch Passer for Oklahoma State. Mason's 2015 season ranks in the 48th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 478 plays — a average rate for the QB. Mason's production has improved each season, a positive development trajectory.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Mason Rudolph's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2015 Production

Passing
264/424 Comp/Att3770 Pass yards21 Pass TD9 INT62.3% Comp %
Rushing
-35 Rush yards1 Rush TD67 Carries-0.5 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2015 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency48
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat0
  • Consistency70
  • Clutch100
Player type
Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)48th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency70th %ile · average
Career trajectory:↑ Rising
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • Career trajectory is upward — WEPA value has improved season over season.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 7 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.16 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.79 EPA/play in Wk 10 vs TCU (SP+ 19).

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0
Kyle McCordSyracuse0.50912.1321.4
Sam HartmanWake Forest0.55611.8359.6
Jordan TravisFlorida State0.47610.1328.3
Trace McSorleyPenn State0.51312.7321.0

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.7900.79Wk 1 vs Central Michigan: +0.48 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Central Arkansas: +0.64 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs UTSA: +0.47 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Texas: +0.16 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Kansas State: +0.43 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs West Virginia: +0.15 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Kansas: +0.52 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Texas Tech: +0.30 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs TCU: +0.79 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Iowa State: +0.50 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Baylor: +0.28 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Oklahoma: -0.53 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs Ole Miss: +0.01 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1@Central MichiganW24-13-3.122/322661084.82010.48
2vsCentral ArkansasW32-823/354012178.3-700.64
3vsUTSAW69-14-17.717/232802078.5-1300.47
4@TexasW30-273.722/342901252.2-3200.16
5vsKansas StateW36-342.634/554373182.8-2700.43
6@West VirginiaW33-2612.920/402180343.94800.15
8vsKansasW58-10-21.320/263051085.8000.52
9@Texas TechW70-534.521/352852154.6-100.30
10vsTCUW49-2919.016/243525095.52600.79
11@Iowa StateW35-31-0.324/363271088.11200.50
12vsBaylorL35-4519.527/504303056.8-3800.28
13vsOklahomaL23-5822.70/30010.0-0.53
1vsOle MissL20-4827.018/311790040.9-2300.01

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
49.2%
Passing plays
82.6%
Rushing plays
8.8%
Standard downs
40.9%
Passing downs
65.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.07
Passing downs
0.75
Pass / Rush EPA
0.43 / -0.17

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.150−0.6820162017
EPA per play · 2015 — 2017 · 39 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2015Oklahoma State
8.2
213.6
2016Oklahoma State
11.6
283.5
2017Oklahoma State
18.4
387.6

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.